Isocyanide Ligands
269 276
C16H23N2F6FeOP (477.97): C 41.76, H 5.04 N 6.09; found: C 41.58, H 5.02, N
5.89.
correction. The structure was solved using SHELXS-97[29] and refined by
alternating least-squares cycles and difference Fourier synthesis
(SHELXL-97[29]) with the aid of the program XSeed.[30] In general all
non-hydrogen atoms were modelled anisotropically, while hydrogen atoms
were assigned an isotropic thermal parameter 1.2 times that of the parent
atom (1.5 for terminal atoms) and allowed to ride, except for acidic protons
which were located on the final difference Fourier map and refined freely.
All calculations were carried out with either a Silicon Graphics Indy
workstation or an IBM compatible PC. Crystallographic data (excluding
structure factors) for the structure reported in this paper have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supple-
mentary publication no. CCDC-168587. Copies of the data can be obtained
free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB21EZ, UK (fax: (44)1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
(tert-Butylisocyanide)carbonylcyclopentadienyl(ethylisocyanide)iron(ii)
hexafluorophosphate 14: Diethyl N-ethylphosphoramidate 8c (92 mg,
0.51 mmol) was dissolved in THF (10 mL), and the solution was degassed
and cooled to À788C. nBuLi (1.6m in hexane, 0.32 mL, 0.51 mmol) was
added dropwise, and the mixture allowed to warm to room temperature
before recooling to À788C. A solution of 10 (205 mg, 0.51 mmol) in
degassed THF (10 mL) was cooled to À788C and added through a cannula
to the phosphoramidate anion solution. The mixture was stirred at À788C
for 7 h, and solvent removed in vacuo. The dark brown residue was
dissolved in acetone and preadsorbed onto silica gel before purification by
column chromatography (SiO2; acetone/petroleum ether 1:2). The product
was subsequently triturated (diethyl ether/petroleum ether 1:1) to afford 14
as a yellow powder (138 mg, 63%). M.p. 126 À 1288C; IR: nÄ 2212, 2179
Crystal data for 16: C20H31F6FeN2OP, Mr 516.29 gmolÀ1, orthorhombic,
À1
1
ꢀ
ꢀ
P212121,
a 11.3149(8),
b 12.1826(11),
c 17.9756(10) ä,
V
(C N), 2021 cm (C O); H NMR (270 MHz): d 5.33 (s, 5H; Cp), 3.92
(q, J 7.2 Hz, 2 H ; CH2), 1.54 (s, 9H; CMe3), 1.41 (t, J 7.2 Hz, 3H; Me);
13C NMR (100.6 MHz): d 213.5 (CO), 86.2 (Cp), 60.9 (CMe3), 41.9
2477.8(3) ä3, Z 4, MoKa, l 0.71073, 1calcd 1.384 MgmÀ3, m 0.731mmÀ1
,
max/min transmission 0.8105/0.7585, T 120(2) K, crystal size 0.40 Â
0.30 Â 0.30 mm3, theta range 2.71 27.498. Reflections collected: 12680,
independent reflections: 5634, parameters 289, R1 [I > 2s(I)] 0.0577, wR2
(NCH2), 29.5 (CMe3), 15.4 (Me); FAB-MS: m/z (%): 287 (100) [M] , 259
(30) [M À CO] , 231 (5) [CpFe(CNtBu)CNH] , 176 (10) [CpFeCNEt] ,
(F 2, all data) 0.1495, largest diff. peak/hole: 0.674/ À 0.660 eäÀ3
.
148 (10) [CpFeCN] ; HRMS calcd for C14H19N2F6FeOP: 287.0847; found:
287.0853.
Synthesis of triisocyanide cyclopentadienyliron complex
Carbonylcyclopentadienyldi[(R)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthylisocyanide)-
iron(ii) hexafluorophosphate (15): A solution of 8d (283 mg, 1 mmol) in
THF was cooled to À788C and MeLi (0.62 mL, 1 mmol of 1.6m solution in
diethyl ether) was added to it. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to
room temperature before recooling to À788C. The solution was then
transferred through a cannula into a suspension of 9 (187 mg, 0.5 mmol) in
degassed THF. The mixture was then stirred at À788C for 6 h, after which
the reaction was quenched with MeOH and the solvent removed in vacuo.
The resultant dark brown residue was purified by chromatography (SiO2;
acetone/hexane 1:2) to yield a yellow solid. Crystallisation from diethyl
Cyclopentadienyltri[(S)-1,2,2-trimethylpropylisocyanide]iron(ii)
fluorophosphate (17):
hexa-
A solution of 16 (51.6 mg, 0.1 mmol) in THF was cooled to À308C and
added dropwise to a suspension of trimethylamine-N-oxide (30.0 mg,
0.4 mmol) in THF. The reaction mixture was stirred at À308C for 2 h and
then allowed to rise to room temperature. The solvent was removed in
vacuo, and the residue was extracted with chloroform and washed with
water. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4. Removal of the solvent in
vacuo gave 17 as a yellow solid [37 mg, 62% based on 16 (67% theoretical
maximum)]; [a]2D0 19.3 (c 0.15 in CH2Cl2); m.p. 111 1138C; IR
1
(CHCl3): nÄ 2187, 2145 cmÀ1 (C N); H NMR (400 MHz): d 4.77 (s, 5H;
ether afforded 15 as yellow crystals (250 mg, 78%). M.p. >2858C; IR: nÄ
ꢀ
À1
2180, 2146 (C N), 2021 cm (C O); 1H NMR (400 MHz): d 7.32 7.03
(m, 8H; Ar), 5.21 (q, 2H; J 5.5 Hz, CH), 5.02 (s, 5H; Cp), 2.79 2.62 (m,
4H), 2.13 2.01 (m, 4H), 1.84 1.73 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
100.6 MHz): d 211.6 (CO), 136.9, 131.7, 131.75, 130.1, 129.2, 128.9,
128.8, 127.2 (Ar), 85.3 (Cp), 57.1 (CH), 30.5 (CH2), 28.8 (CH2), 19.5
ꢀ
ꢀ
Cp), 3.76 (q, J 6.8 Hz, 3H; CH), 1.33 (d, J 6.8 Hz, 9H; CH3), 0.99 (s,
27H; C(CH3)3); 13C NMR (100.6 MHz): d 81.9 (Cp), 63.8 (CH), 34.8
(C(CH3)3), 25.6 (C(CH3)3), 16.6 (CH3); MS: m/z (%): 454 (100) [M À PF6] ,
343 (57) [M À PF6 À CNCH(CH3)C(CH3)3] , 232 (27) [M À PF6 À
CNCH(CH3)C(CH3)3] ; elemental analysis calcd (%) for C38H38N3F6FeP
(CH2); MS: m/z (% 548 (89) [M] , 520 (100) [M À CO] .
(737.55): C 52.09, H 7.40, N 7.01; found: C 52.0, H 7.5, N 6.9.
Carbonylcyclopentadienyldi[(S)-1,2,2-trimethylpropylisocyanide]iron(ii)
hexafluorophosphate (16): A solution of 8e (237 mg, 1 mmol) in THF was
cooled to À788C and MeLi (0.62 mL, 1 mmol of 1.6m solution in diethyl
ether) was added to it. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room
temperature before recooling to À788C. The solution was then transferred
through a cannula into a suspension of 9 (187 mg, 0.5 mmol) in degassed
THF. The mixture was then stirred at À788C for 7 h, after which the
reaction was quenched with MeOH and the solvent removed in vacuo. The
resultant dark brown residue was purified by chromatography (SiO2;
acetone/hexane 1:2) to yield an orange oil. Crystallisation from diethyl
Acknowledgement
CP and JMR wish to thank the EPSRC for a post-doctoral fellowship and
studentship, respectively, and HIand SS wish to thank King×s College
London for a studentship and post-doctoral fellowship, respectively. We
thank the EPSRC and King×s College London for the provision of the
X-ray diffractometer and the Nuffield Foundation for the provision of
computing equipment.
ether afforded 16 as yellow crystals (173 mg, 67%). [a]2d0 12.6 (c 1.55
À1
ꢀ
in CH2Cl2); m.p. 274 2758C; IR (CHCl3): nÄ 2202, 2178 (C N), 2021 cm
1
ꢀ
(C O); H NMR (400 MHz): d 5.08 (s, 5H; Cp), 3.79 (q, 2H; J 6.7 Hz,
CHMe), 1.30 (t, 6H; J 6.7 Hz, CHCH3), 0.92 (s, 18H; tBu); 13C NMR
(100.6 MHz): d 211.0 (CO), 84.4 (Cp), 64.2 (CH), 34.3 (C(CH3)3), 25.2
[1] E. Singleton, H. Oosthuizen, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 22, 209.
[2] R. B. King, M. S. Saran, Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 74.
[3] S. Maiorana, C. Baldoli, E. Licandro, L. Casiraghi, E. de Magistris, A.
Paio, S. Provera, P. Seneci, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7271.
[4] P. Johnston, G. J. Hutchings, L. Denner, J. C. A. Boeyens, N. J. Coville,
Organometallics 1987, 6, 1293.
[5] J. A. Dineen, P. L. Pauson, J. Organometal Chem. 1974, 71, 77.
[6] B.-S. Yoo, N.-S. Choi, C. Y. Shim, Y. Son, S. W. Lee, Inorg. Chim. Acta
2000, 309, 137.
[7] H. Alper, R. A. Partis, J. Organometal. Chem. 1972, 35, C40.
[8] Y.-W. Lin, H.-M. Gau, Y.-S. Wen, K.-L. Lu, Organometallics 1992, 11,
1445.
[9] H. Zimmer, G. Singh, J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 483.
[10] A. Omenat, J.-L. Serrano, T. Sierra, D. B. Amabilino, M. Minguet, E.
Ramos, J. Veciana, J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2301.
(C(CH3)3), 15.8 (CHCH3); MS: m/z (%): 516 (59) [M] , 488 (100) [M À
CO] ; elemental analysis calcd (%) for C20H31N2F6FeOP (516.29): C 46.50,
H 6.05, N 5.45; found: C 46.3, H 5.9, N 5.7.
X-ray crystallography of 16: A crystal of 16 was mounted on a thin glass
fibre using silicon grease and cooled on the diffractometer to 100 K using
an Oxford Cryostream low temperature attachment. Approximate unit cell
dimensions were determined by the Nonius Collect program[27] from five
index frames of width 28 in f using a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer,
with a detector to crystal distance of 30 mm. The Collect program was then
used to calculate a data collection strategy to 99.5% completeness for q
27.58 by using a combination of 28 f and w scans of 10 60sdegÀ1 exposure
time. The crystal was indexed using the DENZO-SMN package,[28] and
positional data were refined along with diffractometer constants to give the
final unit cell parameters. Integration and scaling (DENZO-SMN, Scale-
pack[28]) resulted in unique data sets corrected for Lorentz and polarisation
effects and for the effects of crystal decay and absorption by a combination
of averaging of equivalent reflections and an overall volume and scaling
[11] M. Suginome, H. Nakamura, Y. Ito, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 555.
[12] a) C.-Y. Liu, D.-Y. Chen, M.-C. Cheng, S.-M. Peng, S.-T. Liu,
Organometallics 1995, 14, 1983; b) M. Tamm, F. E. Hahn, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 1999, 182, 175.
Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, No. 1
¹ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2002
0947-6539/02/0801-0275 $ 17.50+.50/0
275