two conformations were not suitable as a cleft. However, the
addition of 5 at 213 K caused the fixation of the conformation
of 4 as a cleft type. This kind of guest responsive conform-
ational change of a host molecule is interesting to study
dynamic process of self-assembling system.
Preparation of dipodant 6
To a DMF solution (20 cm3) of naphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetra-
carboxylic dianhydride (262.9 mg, 1.00 mmol) was added
cyclohexylamine (0.229 cm3, 2.00 mmol) quickly at 120 ЊC. The
resulting mixture was continued to be heated for 15 h. After
evaporation of solvent, chloroform (100 cm3) was added to the
residue. The chloroform layer was washed with aqueous 1 M
HCl solution (50 cm3) and then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4.
After evaporation of solvent, the residue was chromatographed
on silica gel with chloroform as eluent to give 6 (441 mg, 0.96
mmol, 96%) as pale yellow blocks, mp > 300 ЊC; νmax(KBr)/
cmϪ1 2940, 1710, 1670, 1585, 1455, 1330, 1255, 1180 and 770;
δH(400 MHz; CDCl3) 1.33 (2 H, qt, J 13.3 and 3.4 ), 1.44 (2 H,
qt, J 13.3 and 3.4), 1.65–1.80 (8 H, br m), 1.89 (4 H, br d,
J 13.3), 2.31 (4 H, qd, J 12.0 and 3.6), 4.99 (2 H, tt, J 12.0
and 3.6) and 8.68 (4 H, s); MS (EI); 431 (M ϩ 1), 430 (Mϩ, 22),
349 (95), 267 (31), 248 (21), 129 (14), 97 (27) and 57 (100);
HRMS (FAB) Calcd for C26H26N2O4: (MHϩ), 430.1893. Found:
430.1894.
Experimental
General
The melting points were determined on a Yanako MP-S3
melting-point apparatus or a Mac Science DSC 3100S and are
uncorrected. IR spectra were obtained in a HITACHI I-2000
spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL LA-400 or
LA-500 spectrometers in CDCl3 with Me4Si as an internal
standard; J values are given in Hz. Mass spectra were obtained
on a JEOL JMS-HX110. Reaction mixtures were concentrated
on a rotary evaporator at 15–20 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.322
Pa). Chromatographic separations were accomplished by flash
column chromatography on silica gel (Fuji gel BW 200).
1H NMR study
Preparation of tetrakisformyl dipodant 3
An acetic acid solution (20 cm3) of 3α-azidocholanoate 1 (944.7
mg, 1.876 mmol) and zinc powder (4.000 g) was stirred for 24 h
at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was moni-
tored by tlc (CHCl3 :MeOH = 10:1). The reaction mixture was
filtered by suction and the residue was washed with acetic acid
(10 cm3 × 2). A combined filtrate was evaporated and the resi-
due was dissolved in chloroform (100 cm3) and washed with
saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution (100 cm3). The organic
layer was separated and washed with distilled water (100 cm3).
After evaporation of solvent, the crude 3α-aminocholanoate 2
thus obtained, was used for the preparation of 3 without
further purification. To a dimethylformamide (DMF) solution
of naphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylic dianhydride was added
dropwise a solution of crude 2 (927 mg, prepared as above
mentioned) in 10 cm3 of DMF during 0.5 h at 120 ЊC and
stirred for an additional 2 h at this temperature. After evapor-
ation of solvent, the residue was chromatographed on silica gel
with CHCl3–ethyl acetate (20:1) to give 3 (408 mg, 37%) as
brown powder, mp 271.7 ЊC; νmax(KBr)/cmϪ1 2940, 1710, 1670,
1585, 1455, 1330, 1255, and 1180; δH(400 MHz; CDCl3) 0.80
(6 H, s), 0.87 (6 H, d, J 6.3), 1.01 (6 H, s), 1.17–2.60 (46 H, m),
3.21 (2 H, q, J 12.9), 3.68 (6 H, s), 4.95 (2 H, br m), 5.11 (2 H,
br s), 5.32 (2 H, br s), 8.09 (2 H, s), 8.34 (2 H, s) and 8.70 (4 H,
s); HRMS (FAB) Calcd for C68H87N2O16: (MHϩ), 1187.6056.
Found: 1187.6044.
1H NMR spectroscopic titration for the determination of bind-
ing constant between 4 and 5 was carried out as follows. A
measured amount of CDCl3 solution of 4 (25 mmol dmϪ3) was
added to the CDCl3 solution of 5 (2.0 mmol dmϪ3, 0.50 cm3),
1
and after each addition the H NMR spectrum of the mixture
was recorded. The induced chemical shift value was plotted vs.
the ratio of 4 to 5. The binding constant was calculated using
non-linear least square regression minimizing the value of
Σ(δobs Ϫ δcalc). For the variable temperature (VT) 1H NMR
study, the CDCl3 solution (5.0 mml dmϪ3, 0.50 cm3) of 4 was
used.
References
1 C. Seel and F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 528;
R. M. Izatt, J. S. Bradshaw, K. Pawlak, R. L. Bruening and B. J.
Tarbet, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 1261; A. P. Davis, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
1993, 900; S. Anderson, H. L. Anderson and J. K. M. Sanders, Acc.
Chem. Res., 1993, 26, 469; F. C. J. M. van Veggel, W. Verboom and
D. N. Reinhoudt, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 279; J.-M. Lehn,
Supramolecular Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1995; A. D. Hamilton,
Ed., Supramolecular Control of Structure and Reactivity, John Wiley
& Sons, Chichester, 1996.
2 A. P. Davis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1993, 243; A. P. Davis, R. P.
Bonar-Law and J. K. M. Sanders, Comprehensive Supramolecular
Chemistry, Vol. 4, Y. Murakami, Ed., Ch. 7, pp. 257, Pergamon
Press, Oxford, 1996.
3 J. McKenna, J. M. McKenna and D. W. Thornthwaite, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1977, 809.
Preparation of tetraol dipodant 4
4 C. J. Burrows and R. A. Sauter, J. Inclusion Phenom., Mol. Recognit.
Chem., 1987, 5, 117; J. F. Kenneary, T. M. Roy, J. S. Albert,
H. Yoon, T. R. Wagler, L. Shen and C. J. Burrows, J. Inclusion
Phenom., Mol. Recognit. Chem., 1989, 7, 155; J. Kikuchi,
C. Matsushima, K. Suehiro, R. Oda and Y. Murakami, Chem. Lett.,
1991, 1807.
5 S. Kohmoto, D. Fukui, T. Nagashima, K. Kishikawa, M.
Yamamoto and K. Yamada, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1869.
6 K. D. Shimizu, T. M. Dewey and J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1994, 116, 5145.
7 S. M. Verma and N. B. Singh, Aust. J. Chem., 1976, 29, 295.
8 A. P. Davis, J. J. Perry and R. P. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 1793.
9 K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, Wiley, New York, 1987.
10 Simulated curve fits were carried out using GRAFIT Version 3. 0;
R. J. Leatherbarrow, Erithacus Software Ltd, Staines, 1992.
11 A. Mannschreck, G. Rissmann, F. Vögtle and D. Wild, Chem. Ber.,
1967, 100, 335; I. C. Calder and P. J. Garratt, J. Chem. Soc. B., 1967,
660.
Deprotection of 3 was carried out by hydrolysis with LiOH. To
a THF solution (15 cm3) of 3 was added dropwise a saturated
methanolic solution of LiOH under stirring. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by tlc (CHCl3–MeOH = 40:1).
When the spot corresponding to 3 (Rf = 0.95) was completely
(after the addition of 50 drops) converted to that of 4 (Rf = 0.2),
distilled water (50 cm3), brine (70 cm3) and THF (100 cm3) were
added to the reaction mixture and an organic layer was separ-
ated. After evaporation of solvent, the residue was chromato-
graphed on silica gel with CHCl3–MeOH (20:1) to afford 4
(180 mg, 50%), mp 421.5 ЊC; νmax(KBr)/cmϪ1 3540, 2940, 1710,
1665, 1585, 1455, 1335, 1250, 1180 and 1095; δH(500 MHz;
CDCl3) 0.72 (6 H, s), 0.96 (6 H, s), 1.01 (6 H, d, J 6.1), 1.16–1.92
(38 H, m), 2.02 (4 H, m), 2.25 (2 H, m), 2.38 (2 H, m), 2.47 (2 H,
m), 2.69 (2 H, m), 2.71 (2 H, q, J 12.0), 3.42 (2 H, q, J 13.0), 3.66
(6 H, s), 3.87 (2 H, br s), 4.02 (2 H, br s), 4.93 (2 H, br m) and
8.66 (4 H, s); HRMS (FAB) Calcd for C64H87N2O12: (MHϩ),
1075.6259. Found: 1075.6204.
Paper 8/08755E
836
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 833–836