Photoinduced Birefringence in a Poly(malonic ester)
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 106, No. 21, 2002 5379
reacting in chloroform for 48 h at 5 °C malonyl dichloride and
mesogenic alcohol (mp 142 °C) with p-cyanoazobenzene. The
yield and melting temperature of the MCN were 46% and 95
°C, respectively. It was observed by means of differential
scanning calorimetry to show a smectic structure on both heating
and cooling cycles. The phase transition temperatures to LC
state appeared at 63 and 90 °C, respectively, on the heating
and cooling cycles. The isotropization temperatures were 95
and 55 °C, respectively. For the phase transition temperature
of the MCN monomer, the degree of supercooling between the
heating and cooling cycles has a large value from 27 to 40 °C.
Such a phenomenon might be due to the rapid cooling rate
(average rate: 30 °C/min) of the equipment and also to the
complicated structural change with temperature of the mono-
mers. It, however, is not clear yet and needs to be examined in
more detail. The LC structure of the MCN was found by means
of optical polarizing microscopy to show a focal-conic texture.
The MCN was then condensed with 1,6-dibromohexane in
tetrahydrofuran in the presence of sodium hydride at 65 °C for
48 h to give poly(malonic ester) (PCN) with two symmetrical
azo dye mesogens. The polymeric thin film (ca. 0.3 µm) was
cast from the polymer solution (5 wt %) in CHCl3 onto a glass
plate for 30 s using a spin coater.
We employed a standard crossed polarizers setup for mea-
surement of the photoinduced birefringence in the polymeric
film.8 The polarization axes of the polarizer and the analyzer
were 0° and 90° with respect to the incident plane, respectively.
The linearly polarized beams from an Ar+ ion laser of 496 nm
and from a He-Ne laser of 633 nm were used as the pumping
and probe beams, respectively. The wavelength of the probe
beam, 633 nm, is far from the absorption band of the PCN film.
The polarization direction of the pumping beam was adjusted
to 45° and -45° relative to the analyzer by using a λ/2
waveplate. The transmittance of the probe beam through crossed
polarizers and the polymer film placed between them was
measured with a photodiode.
Results and Discussion
In Figure 2a, repetitive recording, relaxation, and erasing
curves of photoinduced birefringence in the PCN film are shown
for five cycles. The polarization direction of the pumping beam
was set to 45° in the recording process, the circularly polarized
pumping beam was used as the erasing beam and the time
interval between each repeated cycles was fixed at 3 min. As
shown in Figure 2a, as the number of the repeated cycles
increased, the induced birefringence in the recording process
increased gradually and the initial birefringence before switching
on the pumping beam also increased slightly. Since these cycles
were successively carried out, the initial birefringence at each
cycle was the remnant birefringence of the previous erasing
process, and therefore it can be eliminated by increasing the
erasing time or the erasing beam intensity. However, we can
obtain information about the reorientation of the backbone from
the remnant birefringence after a finite erasing process, which
will be dealt with in detail later in Figure 4. In Figure 2b, the
recording, relaxation, and erasing processes of the photoinduced
birefringence were continued with the linearly polarized pump-
ing beam at -45°, following the experiments of Figure 2a. As
can be seen in Figure 2b, the initial birefringence remained,
more or less, before the first recording process. As soon as the
pumping beam was turned on at -45°, the birefringence
decreased initially to zero and then increased gradually to
0.0025, which is smaller than the induced birefringence, 0.0045,
Figure 2. Photoinduced birefringence curves of PCN film in the
recording, relaxation, and erasing processes, which were successively
measeured fifteen times in total; (a) for the first five cycles, the
polarization direction of the pumping beam was 45° relative to the
analyzer, and (b) for the next 10 cycles, the polarization direction was
-45°. The inset shows the first photoinduced birefringence curve after
changing the polarization direction of the pumping beam.
in the first recording process of Figure 2a. However, similarly
to the results of Figure 2a, as the number of the repeated cycles
increased, the induced birefringence gradually increased. In the
first relaxation curve of Figure 2b, it is a remarkable result that
the remnant birefringence nearly became zero after the fast
relaxation of the photoinduced birefringence. As the number
of the repeated cycles increased, the remnant also increased
gradually to the value that is shown in Figure 2a.
Figure 3 shows the maximum photoinduced birefringence
with the number of repeated cycles, where the pumping beam
with a polarization direction of 45° was used during first five
cycles, and the pumping beam at -45° was used during the
following 10 cycles. The photoinduced birefringence increased
gradually for the first five cycles and then decreased greatly as
soon as the polarization direction was changed perpendicularly.
This can be explained well by the reorientation of the backbone
according to our model.8