Mendeleev Commun., 2007, 17, 43–44
Table 2 Deprotection of acylals catalysed by Envirocat EPZ10R.
We are grateful to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Head of the
Department of Chemistry, Marathwada University, Aurangabad,
for providing laboratory facilities. We also thank Contract
Chemicals, England, for the generous gift of Envirocat EPZ10 .
Without acidic Al O
2 3
2
With acidic Al O3
Compound
R
t/min
Yield (%)
t/min
Yield (%)
2
2
2
2
2
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
4
6
6
8
3
5
90
80
75
85
90
90
7
10
9
10
6
85
75
70
80
85
85
References
1
T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic
rd
Synthesis, 3 edn., Wiley, New York, 1999.
2
3
4
M. J. Gregory, J. Chem. Soc. B, 1970, 1201.
8
B. B. Snider and S. G. Amin, Synth. Commun., 1978, 8, 117.
J. S. Yadav, B. V. Subba Raddy and G. S. Kiran Kumar Reddy,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 2695.
have three reactive centres: a carbon–carbon double bond, an
α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group (pyrone ring) and a formyl
group. The reaction chemoselectively occurs at the formyl group
5
6
7
M. Sandberg and L. K. Sydnes, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 6361.
J. G. Frick and R. J. Harper, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1984, 29, 1433.
W. R. Eanderson, Eur. Pat. Appl. EP125781, 1985 (Chem. Abstr., 1985,
(
Table 1). The acylals were isolated by quenching in water and
1
02, 64010K).
neutralization with sodium bicarbonate, while solvent extrac-
tion is sufficient for deprotection.
In view of green chemistry, the efficient recovery and reuse
of the catalyst is highly preferable. In our process, Envirocat
EPZ10 was recovered conveniently from the reaction mixture
§
8
9
M. Tomita, T. Kikuchi, K. Bessho, T. Hori and Y. Inubushi, Chem.
Pharm. Bull., 1963, 11, 1484.
J. K. Michie and J. A. Miller, Synthesis, 1981, 824.
10 V. K. Aggarwal, S. Fonquerna and G. P. Vennall, Synlett., 1998, 849.
R
11 D. Karmakar, D. Prajapati and J. S. Sandhu, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1998,
through filtration and subsequent washing with ethyl acetate.
In the synthesis of acylals, the catalytic activity of recovered
Envirocat EPZ10 was slightly lower than that of the fresh
catalyst, and it remained unchanged in two further attempts
without a loss of yield.
382.
1
2 B. C. Ranu, J. Dutta and A. Das, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32, 366.
13 J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy and Ch. Srinivas, Synth. Commun., 2002,
2, 1175.
R
3
1
4 (a) S. Caddick, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 10403; (b) R. S. Varma, Green
Chem., 1999, 1, 43.
1
1
5 L. Bai, J.-X. Wang and Y. Zhang, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 615.
6 S. Rostamizadeh and K. Sadeghi, Synth. Commun., 2002, 32, 1899.
‡
General procedure for the deprotection of acylals to 4-oxo-(4H)-
17 A. Dandia, M. Sati, K. Arya, P. Sarawgi and A. Loupy, Arkivoc, 2005,
1-benzopyran-3-carbaldehyde.
i, 105.
A. With acidic alumina. In a 25 ml conical flask, 10 mmol of acylals
18 L. D. S. Yadav, S. Singh and A. Singh, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43,
R
and 1 g of acidic alumina were added to 50 mg of Envirocat EPZ10 and
mixed thoroughly. The reaction mixture was exposed to microwave
irradiation (800 W) for a prescribed time (Table 2). After completion
of reaction monitored by TLC, 10 ml of ethyl acetate was added to the
reaction mixture. The catalyst and acidic alumina were filtered off and
washed with ethyl acetate (2×15 ml) for further uses. The organic layer
8551.
19 J. H. Clark, A. P. Kybett and D. J. Macquarrie, Supported Reagents,
VCH, New York, 1992.
20 J. H. Clark and D. J. Macquarrie, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1996, 303; Product
information of Contract Chemicals, England, 1994.
21 A. S. Gajare, M. S. Shingare and B. P. Bandgar, J. Chem. Res. (S),
1
998, 452.
was dried over anhydrous MgSO and concentrated on a rotary evaporator.
4
22 K. Y. Lee and K. Y. Ko, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2004, 25, 1929.
23 B. P. Bandgar and S. P. Kasture, J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 2000, 47, 1243.
24 H. V. Schaik, R. J. Vijn and F. Bickelhaupt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1994, 33, 1611.
The residue was recrystallised from a proper solvent to afford the pure
product.
B. Without acidic alumina. In a 25 ml conical flask, 10 mmol of acylals
was added to 50 mg of Envirocat EPZ10R and mixed thoroughly. The
reaction mixture was exposed to microwave irradiation (800 W) for a
prescribed time (Table 2). After completion of reaction monitored by TLC,
2
2
2
5 V. A. Mahajan, P. D. Shinde, A. S. Gajare, M. Karthikeyan and R. D.
Wakharkar, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 325.
6 R. V. Hangarge, A. S. Mane, V. P. Chavan and M. S. Shingare, Ind. J.
Chem., 2002, 41B, 1302.
7 R. V. Hangarge, S. A. Siddiqui, S. R. Shengule and M. S. Shingare,
Mendeleev Commun., 2002, 209.
1
0 ml of ethyl acetate was added to the reaction mixture. The catalyst
was filtered off and washed with ethyl acetate (2×15 ml). The organic
layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO and concentrated on a rotary
4
evaporator. The residue was recrystallised from a proper solvent to afford
the pure product.
28 S. S. Shindalkar, B. R. Madje and M. S. Shingare, Indian J. Chem.,
2005, 44B, 1519.
§
–
Acetoxy(6-methyl-4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)methyl acetate 2a. IR (n/cm
29 S. S. Shindalkar, B. R. Madje and M. S. Shingare, J. Korean Chem.
Soc., 2005, 49, 377.
1)
: 3050 (C–H ), 1656 (C=OChromone), 1755 (OCOMe). H NMR
1
Ar
(
CDCl ) d: 2.14 (s, 6H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 7.35–7.38 (d, 1H, J 8 Hz), 7.48–
3
7
.49 (d, 1H, J 8 Hz), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.51–7.52 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 1H).
1
3
C NMR (CDCl ) d: 175.46, 168.76, 155.14, 154.88, 136.21, 135.78,
3
1
25.67, 124.27, 119.79, 118.31, 85.63, 21.34, 21.17. Calc. for C H O
1
5
14
6
(
%): C, 62.07; H, 4.86. Found (%): C, 62.11; H, 4.82.
Acetoxy(6-chloro-4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)methyl acetate 2b. IR (n/cm ):
–1
1
3
050 (C–H ), 1643 (C=O
), 1750 (OCOMe), 1013 (C–Cl). H NMR
Ar
Chromone
(
CDCl ) d: 2.13 (s, 6H), 7.42–7.45 (d, 1H, J 8.7 Hz), 7.61–7.63 (dd, 1H,
3
J 2.2 and 8.7 Hz), 7.77 (s, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, 1H, J 2.2 Hz).
1
3
C NMR (CDCl ) d: 174.23, 168.68, 155.43, 154.90, 134.81, 132.16,
3
1
25.73, 125.49, 120.37, 120.17, 85.23, 20.09. Calc. for C H ClO (%):
1
4
11
6
C, 54.12; H, 3.57. Found (%): C, 54.10; H, 3.55.
Acetoxy(7-methyl-4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl)methyl acetate 2c. IR (n/cm ):
–1
1
3
050 (C–H ), 1656 (C=O
), 1758 (OCOMe). H NMR (CDCl )
Ar
Chromone 3
d: 2.10 (s, 6H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, 1H, J 8.7 Hz), 7.78 (d,
13
1
H, J 8.7 Hz), 7.94 (s, 1H), 8.06 (s, 1H). C NMR (CDCl ) d: 175.40,
3
168.69, 155.12, 154.83, 136.15, 135.75, 125.55, 124.17, 119.77, 118.68,
8
5.49, 21.31, 21.11. Calc. for C H O (%): C, 62.07; H, 4.86. Found (%):
15
14 6
C, 62.08; H, 4.84.
Received: 9th October 2006; Com. 06/2790
–
44 –