Page 5 of 7
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
Taken together, the modulation of local pH and suppression
of wasteful intermediates could have a synergistic effect, which
result in the 34-fold enhancement in cyt c-PAA turnover number
reported here (Scheme 1). This may also help to explain the
broadened pH profile, as the ionization of PAA changes >50%
over the range studied.30 Additionally, both effects explain the
dependence of kcat on PAA Mw – increasing the Mw at a fixed cyt
c:PAA mole ratio increases the concentration of acidic groups
and magnitude of the negative charge.
We next examined if these concepts could be extended to
other heme peroxidases, such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
or hemoglobin (Hb). PAA conjugates of HRP and Hb were
prepared and characterized in a similar manner to cyt c-PAA,
after which Michaelis-Menten kinetics of guaiacol oxidation
were measured (Figure S9, Table S2). HRP-PAA had similar KM
and kcat to native HRP (Welch’s t-test, p<0.05). The rate constant
of inactivation of HRP by H2O2 via Compound III is at least 10-
fold smaller than that of cyt c,31,32 so the lack of improvement
was not unexpected. Hb, a typically inefficient peroxidase,33 was
improved by conjugation to PAA. kcat of Hb-PAA(50k) and Hb-
PAA(250k) were 1.1(±0.1) s-1 and 0.62(±0.04) s-1, both larger
than that of Hb, 0.43(±0.06) s-1 (Table S2). Together, the kinetics
of HRP-PAA, cyt c-PAA, and Hb-PAA indicated that the PAA could
improve the efficiency of certain enzymatic processes when the
enzymes were unstable in the presence of excess H2O2.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSF EAGEDROAI:w10a.r1d03D9M/CR9O-1B4040158471B9
and by UCONN VPR Research Excellence Award. The authors thank
Dr. Yao Lin, Jill Durso, Tawan Jamdee, Sabika Sherwani, Deaneira
Lakheram, and Caterina Riccardi for assistance.
References
1
T. A. Wright, R. C. Page and D. Konkolewicz, Polym. Chem., 2019,
10, 434–454.
2
I. Cobo, M. Li, B. S. Sumerlin and S. Perrier, Nat Mater, 2015, 14,
143–159.
3
4
5
6
R. Klitzing and H. Moehwald, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 3554–3559.
Y. Zhang, Q. Wang and H. Hess, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 2047–2051.
L. Goldstein, Biochemistry, 1972, 11, 4072–4084.
Y. Gao, C. C. Roberts, J. Zhu, J.-L. Lin, C. A. Chang and I.
Wheeldon, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2149–2153.
7
8
H. Murata, C. S. Cummings, R. R. Koepsel and A. J. Russell,
Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15, 2817–2823.
C. M. Riccardi, K. S. Cole, K. R. Benson, J. R. Ward, K. M. Bassett,
Y. Zhang, O. V. Zore, B. Stromer, R. M. Kasi and C. V. Kumar,
Bioconjug. Chem., 2014, 25, 1501–1510.
9
Z. Zhao, J. Fu, S. Dhakal, A. Johnson-Buck, M. Liu, T. Zhang, N. W.
Woodbury, Y. Liu, N. G. Walter and H. Yan, Nature
Communications, 2016, 7, 10619.
10 C. M. Riccardi, D. Mistri, O. Hart, M. Anuganti, Y. Lin, R. M. Kasi
and C. V. Kumar, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 2593–2596.
11 G. I. Berglund, G. H. Carlsson, A. T. Smith, H. Szöke, A. Henriksen
and J. Hajdu, Nature, 2002, 417, 463–468.
12 B. Valderrama, M. Ayala and R. Vazquez-Duhalt, Chemistry &
Biology, 2002, 9, 555–565.
13 Y.-W. Lin and J. Wang, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2013,
129, 162–171.
14 G. W. Bushnell, G. V. Louie and G. D. Brayer, J. Mol. Biol., 1990,
214, 585–595.
15 A. F. Habeeb, Anal. Biochem., 1966, 14, 328–336.
16 D. R. Doerge, R. L. Divi and M. I. Churchwell, Analytical
Biochemistry, 1997, 250, 10–17.
17 Z. Wang, T. Matsuo, S. Nagao and S. Hirota, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2011, 9, 4766–4769.
18 S. Maiti, K. Das, S. Dutta and P. K. Das, Chemistry – A European
Journal, 18, 15021–15030.
19 M. Patila, I. V. Pavlidis, E. K. Diamanti, P. Katapodis, D. Gournis
and H. Stamatis, Process Biochemistry, 2013, 48, 1010–1017.
20 N. J. Greenfield, Nat Protoc, 2006, 1, 2876–2890.
21 S. Hirota, Y. Hattori, S. Nagao, M. Taketa, H. Komori, H.
Kamikubo, Z. Wang, I. Takahashi, S. Negi, Y. Sugiura, M. Kataoka
and Y. Higuchi, PNAS, 2010, 107, 12854–12859.
22 S. Oellerich, H. Wackerbarth and P. Hildebrandt, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2002, 106, 6566–6580.
23 E. Stellwagen, Biochemistry, 1968, 7, 2893–2898.
24 M. Simon, V. M.-L. Meuth, S. Chevance, O. Delalande and A.
Bondon, J Biol Inorg Chem, 2013, 18, 27–38.
25 L. S. Kaminsky, V. J. Miller and A. J. Davison, Biochemistry, 1973,
12, 2215–2221.
Conclusions
The results presented here hint at ways in which the physical
characteristics of polyelectrolytes such as PAA could be used to
tune the catalytic activity and efficiency of enzyme-polymer
conjugates. In this case, PAA destabilized a wasteful
intermediate while acidifying the local pH, thus improving the
activity of heme peroxidases, cyt c and Hb, and leading to the
34-fold increase in kcat of cyt c-PAA(250k). Significantly, by
supressing Compound III formation, PAA influenced the enzyme
mechanism. These effects could be systematically controlled by
varying the PAA Mw, allowing for precise tuning of peroxidase
activity. Additionally, these findings suggest that, with a good
understanding of the catalytic mechanism and careful polymer
selection, this concept could be extended to other enzyme-
polymer systems.
Experimental
Full experimental details are provided in the Supporting
Information.
Supporting Information
Supplementary figures and experimental methods can be found in
the Supporting Information.
26 Y. Zhang, S. Tsitkov and H. Hess, Nature Communications, 2016,
7, 13982.
27 S. A. Adediran, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 1996,
327, 279–284.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins