the reactivity of the system could be restored upon introduc-
tion of an additional 3 equiv of sparteine relative to the
complex (particularly the chloride derivatives).7 Intrigued by
this finding, we hypothesized that the excess sparteine was
serving as a general base for the ultimate neutralization of
HCl liberated from the system, and thus investigated the
effect of other bases on the reaction. Indeed, Sigman’s kinetic
work has confirmed this hypothesis.
Table 2. Catalyst and External Alcohol Effects
time conversionb ROHc
(h) (%)
ee (%) sd
As shown in Table 1, we surveyed the effect of a variety
of external bases and additives on the oxidative kinetic
entry
additive
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
sparteine (5 mol %)
sparteine (10 mol %)
sparteine (30 mol %)
n-BuOH (1.0 equiv)
n-BuOH (2.0 equiv)
n-BuOH (10 equiv)
t-BuOH (1.0 equiv)
t-BuOH (4.0 equiv)
t-BuOH (10 equiv)
5
5
5
5.5
5.5
45
60
83
96
98
95
56
90
94
90
12
12
15
12
10
7
16
20
16
56
61
66
67
48
57
57
57
Table 1. Additive Effects on the Oxidative Kinetic Resolution
19
22.5d
11.5d
19e
a 10 mol % Pd(nbd)Cl2, 10 mol % (-)-sparteine, 1 equiv of Cs2CO3, 1
atm of O2, 0.1 M substrate concentration in PhCH3. b Measured by 1H
NMR. c Measured by chiral HPLC. d Conducted at 50 °C. e Conducted at
45 °C.
time conversionb ROHc
entry
additive
(h)
(%)
ee (%) sd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
nonee
96
20
13
13
13
13
13
67
26
19
7
27
56
68
98
31
19
8
31
84
99
12
22
11
20
15
13
13
Et3N (0.4 equiv)
Et3N (2.0 equiv)
DABCO (0.4 equiv)
Na2CO3 (1.0 equiv)
K2CO3 (1.0 equiv)
Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv)
provide a beneficial effect on reactivity as well. In particular,
the addition of t-BuOH increased the selectivity of the
reaction at little expense to the overall rate. At slightly
decreased temperatures (i.e., 50 °C), a selectivity factor (s)
of 20 was observed over 11.5 h, with resolution of alcohol
3 to 57% conversion and 94% ee.8
To directly compare the effect of additives on the overall
rate to that of our previous conditions, we carried out a
parallel analysis at 80 °C. As shown in Scheme 2, there is
a 10 mol % Pd(nbd)Cl2, 10 mol % (-)-sparteine, 1 atm of O2, 0.1 M
substrate concentration in PhCH3. b Measured by 1H NMR. c Measured
by chiral HPLC. d See footnote 8. e 5 mol % Pd(nbd)Cl2, 20 mol %
(-)-sparteine.
resolution and compared the results to those previously
reported (entry 1).1,2 For all trials depicted in Table 1, a 1:1
ratio of Pd(nbd)Cl2/sparteine was employed. Although ad-
dition of amine bases provided high levels of selectivity,
resolutions performed under these conditions failed to
proceed beyond low conversion (entries 2-4). The most
dramatic effect was observed upon addition of carbonate
salts. Specifically, inclusion of 1.0 equiv of powdered
anhydrous Cs2CO3 resolved benzylic alcohol 3 in just 13 h,
with comparable selectivity to our previously reported
conditions.
Scheme 2
Having observed a marked additive effect, we attempted
to further improve the system by optimizing the catalyst
loading, Pd/sparteine ratio, and by continuing to study the
effects of additives. As shown in Table 2, increased amounts
of sparteine still have a positive effect on the selectivity
and the overall rate of the reaction (entries 1-3). In fact,
by simply increasing the total amount of (-)-sparteine to
that previously employed (4:1 sparteine/Pd), we could
achieve alcohol resolution to high enantiopurity in only 5 h
(entry 3).
a clear overall rate acceleration using Cs2CO3 and t-BuOH
as additives. Specifically, under these conditions resolution
of alcohol 5 to 94% ee is observed after only 3 h.
Unfortunately, there is also a noticeable erosion in selectivity
as compared to our original conditions. Most of this
selectivity diminution can be overcome by simply performing
the reaction at a slightly lower temperature and at somewhat
increased substrate concentration in PhCH3 (see Table 3,
entry 1).
Interestingly, it was found that alcohols that are not readily
oxidized (i.e., nonactivated primary and tertiary alcohols),
Having identified a number of highly reactive catalytic
systems, we began to investigate the substrate scope using
(7) Sigman observed a similar phenomenon2 and has recently published
a kinetic study of the effect; see: Mueller, J. A.; Jensen, D. R.; Sigman,
M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8202.
(8) The selectivity factor (s) was determined using the equation s )
k
rel(fast/slow) ) ln[(1 - C)(1 - ee)]/ln[(1 - C)(1 + ee)], where C )
conversion.5c
836
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 6, 2003