Angewandte
Chemie
2
58C. The cold-crystallization behaviors and lower T values
The electrochemical windows of the neat ILs were studied
m
(
entries 2 and 6) of the two [EDMF]-based ILs suggest that
by cyclic voltammetry (CV) on a glassy-carbon electrode, as
illustrated in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. Table 2
summarizes the test results for the cathodic (Ecathodic) and
anodic (Eanodic) limits, and the overall electrochemical win-
dows (EW= EanodicÀEcathodic). As can been seen, all of the
amide-derived ILs possess a relatively wide electrochemical
this cation is less prone to form an ordered structure than
others. The densities (1) of the ILs fall in the range from
1
those of [EMIm]-based ILs. For a given anion, the amide-
derived ILs exhibit a lower surface tension (g, 34.5–
4
4
À3
.3165 to 1.5405 gcm at 258C, densities which are close to
À1
1.3 mNm , 258C) than [EMIm] ILs, for example,
window, ranging up to approximately 4.5 V, which is much
À1
[13a]
1.9 mNm for [EMIm]TfO.
larger than the protic amide ILs (ca. 2.2 V),
and compa-
The viscosities (h) of the ILs were measured at 258C and
rable to [EMIm]-based ILs (ca. 4.5 V, Table 2). Compared to
the results are listed in Table 2. Accordingly, the amide-
derived ILs are generally of low viscosity, with values as low
[EMIm] ILs (Eanodic ꢀ 2.3 V for NTf and TfO), the anodic
2
limit, related to the oxidation of anions, of the amide-based
ILs is more positive (ca. 2.8 V). So although the cathodic limit
of the latter (ca. À1.7 V) is less negative than that of the
former (ca. À2.2 V), their overall electrochemical windows
as 21.6 cP for [EDMF]NTf , which is even less viscous than
2
[
EMIm]NTf (32.5 cP). Such low viscosity can be related to
2
the structures of the amide cations, which are of (quasi)planar
geometry, low symmetry, and contain an ether moiety
are almost equal. This difference in the E
value suggests
anodic
(
Scheme 1). These structural features are useful for decreas-
that counterions may exert a significant effect on the electro-
chemical stability of each other, although it was generally
assumed that the cathodic limit is set by the reduction of the
cations and the anodic limit is set by the oxidation of the
ing the ion packing efficiency and offer more free volumes for
[
19]
promoting mass transfer. The viscosity values are generally
governed by three major factors: the amide precursor, the O-
alkyl chain length, and anionic species. First of all, compared
with other ILs (e.g., [EDMA]NTf : 40.8 cP), DMF-derived
ILs are the least viscous (e.g., [EDMF]NTf : 21.6 cP). This
result can be attributed to the hydrogen atom on N=CHÀO,
with reference to imidazolium ILs, where the small C2-H
atom on the cation ring allows more rotational freedom of the
[
20]
anions. Besides, the cathodic limits of DMF derivatives are
a bit less negative (ca. À1.6 V), and should be related to the
acidity of the N=CHÀO proton, analogous to imidazolium
2
2
[
19a]
ILs.
The combination of the wide electrochemical window
and high conductivity implies a potential application in
electrochemistry.
[
19a]
N-alkyl chains for low viscosity.
Secondly, the amide O-
In conclusion, we present the synthesis of a new class of
low-cost amide-derived aprotic ILs from amide O-alkylation
with alkyl triflate. The amide O-alkylation reaction is readily
reversible with temperature, and the regenerated volatile
precursors can be easily vacuum distilled at about 2008C and
also revert to ILs at room temperature, with the maximum
recovery rate of up to 99 wt% and purity of 97%. To our
knowledge, this is the first case demonstrating the feasibility
of the easy recycling of aprotic ILs by the distillation of the
regenerated molecular precursors at elevated temperatures
without the need for further processing. We believe that this
synthesis strategy can be extended to designing and develop-
ing new ILs and other useful compounds, and the recycling
strategy can be applied to solving the recycling challenge of
the nonvolatile ILs in large-scale applications. Besides, the
amide-cation-based ILs have low viscosity (21.6 cP at 258C),
bonded alkyl chain result in an ether group. Ether moieties
are featured for their ability to reduce the liquid viscosity, and
the O-terminal rodlike CH CH tail is much more efficient in
reducing viscosity than the spherical CH tail. Our exper-
imental results are in complete accordance with the relevant
2
3
3
[
19b]
literature,
O-methyl ILs, for example, [EEPyr]TfO (52.3 cP) versus
MEPyr]TfO (85.1 cP). Thirdly, by keeping the anion con-
stant, most TfO ILs are much more viscous than NTf ILs, as
and the O-ethyl ILs are much less viscous than
[
2
[
17]
expected. However and interestingly, DMF-derived TfO
ILs are nearly as low in viscosity as NTf ILs, for example,
2
[
EDMF]TfO (22.4 cP) versus [EDMF]NTf2 (21.6 cP). In
addition, this unusual result can also be observed in the
following conductivity values.
Generally, low viscosity allows high conductivity for ILs
and thus they serve as better electrolytes in electrochemical
devices. The conductivities (k; Table 2) of the samples that are
À1
high conductivity (15.45 mScm at 258C), and wide electro-
chemical windows (ca. 4.5 V), thus indicating their potential
in electrochemical applications.
(
supercooled) liquids at 258C were investigated, and ranged
À1
from 3.48 to 15.45 mScm . Clearly, the overall relatively high
conductivity values benefit from the low viscosity. These
DMF-derived ILs are even more conductive than their
Received: July 25, 2013
Published online: October 31, 2013
[
(
EMIm]-based counterparts, for example, [EDMF]NTf2
11.29 mScm ) versus [EMIm]NTf (8.81 mScm ). Another
2
À1
À1
Keywords: alkylation · amides · computational chemistry ·
cyclic voltammetry · ionic liquids
.
major factor in determining conductivity is ionic size, of which
the small sizes are convenient for ion transfer. For a given
cation, although TfO-based ILs are generally more viscous
than NTf -based ILs, the former are more conductive than the
2
[
1] a) A. Kokorin, Ionic Liquids: Applications and Perspectives,
latter, especially for DMF derivatives. For example, for
À1
[
(
MDMF]TfO
(15.45 mScm )
versus
[MDMF]NTf2
À1
10.96 mScm ), the former is nearly as low in viscosity as
[
the latter, but is smaller in size than the latter.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13392 –13396
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim