SOLVOLYSES OF ETHYL PHENYLPHOSPHONOCHLORIDATE
761
possible to obtain reliable values of S for 99.5% alcohol–
water mixtures, and even for 99.8% ethanol–water.
required to explain any decrease in S in highly aqueous
23
media.
Selectivities for carboxylic acid chorides are compli-
8,23
cated by mechanistic changes,
but solvolyses of p-
DISCUSSION
nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride strongly support the theory
that values of S may reach a plateau in highly aqueous
24
The substrate 1 was selected because it contained one
aromatic ring, a suitable chromophore for UV detection
in HPLC, and reacted by a single nucleophilic substitu-
tion mechanism at a convenient rate. Preliminary
conductimetric measurements in 95% (v/v) acetone–
media. Selectivities for p-nitrobenzoyl chloroformate
in methanol–water also increase as water is added, but in
ethanol–water there is a decrease from 5.2 in 40% to 4.7
19
25
in 10% ethanol–water. Solvolyses of 1 (Table 2) and
18
(PhO) P(=O)Cl confirm that S values may decrease
2
À4
water at 0°C gave a rate constant of (7.63 Æ 0.14) Â 10
slightly (ca 15%) in highly aqueous media, even when a
mechanistic change is unlikely.
À1
s , in only fair agreement with the published titrimetric
À4 À1 19
value of 9.9 Â 10 s . Solvolyses of phosphono-
To analyse the results (Tables 1 and 2) in more detail,
18,22–25
chloridates having OMe, OEt or OPh groups occur at
we follow previous work
and assume that the
very similar rates in 95% (v/v) acetone–water at 0°C
pseudo-first-order reactions occur by a combination of
four third-order processes in which one molecule of
solvent (water, w, or alcohol, a) acts as a nucleophile and
the other acts as a general base: see Eqn. (2), in which the
first letter of the subscript denotes the nucleophile and the
second letter denotes the general base:
19
(
within a factor of two), and in general are much less
sensitive to substituent effects than solvolyses of
1
9,21
corresponding carbonyl compounds.
an alkyl group by an O-alkyl group only results in a ca
5-fold rate decrease, whereas ethyl chloroformate
Even replacing
1
4
(
EtOCOCl) solvolyses about 10 times more slowly than
21
2
acetyl chloride.
kobs k water ꢀk k falcoholwater
ww
aw
wa
Rate constants for solvolyses of the chlorophosphonate
(Table 1) are close to 10-fold faster than those for
2
k alcohol g
ꢀ2
aa
1
18
corresponding solvolyses of [(PhO) P(=O)Cl] over the
2
The third-order rate constant for hydrolysis, kww and kaa,
can be calculated from the rate constants in pure solvents,
and the other two rate constants can be obtained from the
full range of alcohol–water mixtures. Hence, there is no
evidence for significant differences in initial state or other
effects for solvolyses of the more hydrophobic diphenyl
product selectivities as described below.
18
ester in more aqueous solvents. The additional O-aryl
group in the phosphorochloridate [(PhO) P( O)Cl] is
2
When the kaa term (k [alcohol] ) is unimportant, S
aa
=
2
2
9,21
[
Eqn. (1)] simplifies to Eqn. (3), and when k [water] is
1
ww
the main factor lowering the reactivity.
23
negligible S is given by Eqn. (4):
Product selectivities for 1 (Table 2) are greater than but
very similar to (within a factor of two) those for
1
=S ꢀk =k ꢀalcohol=water kww=k
ꢀ3
ꢀ4
17
wa aw
aw
[
(PhO) P(=O)Cl]. For both substrates, S increases
2
about three fold from 99.8 to 90% alcohol–water and
only about the same amount from 90 to 40% alcohol–
water. Consequently, the main cause of variations in S
does not appear to be medium effects of the solvents,
because medium effects usually change more gradually
S ꢀk =k ꢀwater=alcohol k =k
aw wa
aa wa
Two independent measurements of the ratios of the
3
with variations in solvent composition. The similar
trends for both substrates also confirm that S may
decrease slightly in more aqueous media (from ca 40%
alcohol–water towards water), even when there is no
Table 3. Ratios kaw/kwa derived from 1/S and S plots [Eqns !3)
and !4)] for solvolyses of ethyl phenylphosphonochloridate
!1) in alcohol±water mixtures
19
evidence for mechanistic changes.
Plot
Solvent range
Slope
k /k
aw wa
An explanation of the ca 10-fold increase in S from
a
9
9.8% alcohol to 10% alcohol–water solvents (Table 2)
1/S
30–80% EtOH
98–99.8% EtOH
40–80% MeOH
92–99.8% MeOH
1.61 Æ 0.07 0.62 Æ 0.03
0.60 Æ 0.04 0.60 Æ 0.04
0.47 Æ 0.01 2.13 Æ 0.05
1.24 Æ 0.06 1.24 Æ 0.06
b
S
cannot be achieved if the reactions simply involved
second-order reactions, in which either alcohol or water
attacked the substrate, because S would then be expected
c
1
S
/S
d
2
a
to be constant. The results can be explained by third-
Eqn. (3): slope = 1.606 Æ 0.070, intercept = 1.053 Æ 0.044,
order processes, in which one molecule of solvent acts as
a nucleophile and the other acts as a general base.
According to this theory, S should reach a maximum
r = 0.996.
b
Eqn. (4): slope = 0.601 Æ 0.042, intercept = 0.047 Æ 0.002,
r = 0.995.
c
Eqn. (3): slope = 0.474 Æ 0.012, intercept = 0.631 Æ 0.012,
(
plateau) value in highly aqueous media, when water
r = 0.999.
22
d
dominates as the general base; another factor such as
mechanistic change was previously thought to be
Eqn. (4): slope = 1.235 Æ 0.056, intercept = 0.173 Æ 0.006,
r = 0.997.
Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2001; 14: 759–763