Reaction of Diiron(II) Precursors with Dioxygen
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 9, 1996 2599
Interpretation of the Activation Parameters for Adduct
Formation and Comparisons to Other Systems. The activa-
tion parameters of a reaction reflect the transition state, allowing
deductions about the reaction coordinate and comparisons to
other known reactions to be made. Theoretically, the Eyring
equation is valid only for elementary reactions. When more
complicated reactions are subjected to such an analysis, negative
curvature in the plot can be encountered, indicating that two
separate steps are rate-limiting at the temperature extremes. In
practice, however, it is often possible to study complex rate
equations by this methodology so long as curvature is absent
over a given temperature range. The values then correspond
to the energy barrier for the rate-determining elementary step
in that range. The Eyring plot shown in Figure 5 exemplifies
such behavior for the reaction of 1a with dioxygen. Over the
temperature range studied, a single step dominates the activation
barrier and a linear plot results. The reactions of 2a and 3a are
simple second-order reactions, studied under pseudo-first-order
conditions, and linearity is predicted.
The activation enthalpy for the reactions of 2a and 3a with
dioxygen is remarkably similar to that of deoxyHr formation.
It is possible that this agreement is merely a coincidence, but it
may represent the energy barrier to reach the transition state in
the interaction of dioxygen with a reduced diiron(II) center
having an accessible binding site to form a peroxodiiron(III)
species. In Hr, one iron atom has such a vacant site. Since
the structures of the peroxide adducts differ for Hr and the model
compounds, the implication is that the binding of dioxygen and
the associated two-electron oxidation of the iron center comprise
the rate-determining step. Structural rearrangements to form a
similar to that encountered in an acid-base titration. The
changes in optical density therefore do not relate to a binding
event.
Two Possible Peroxo Intermediate Decay Mechanisms.
The results for decay of the peroxide intermediates provide some
interesting clues about the behavior of these metastable species.
This reaction is of primary interest to those seeking to
understand non-heme iron oxo-transfer chemistry. It is this step
in the overall transformation which diverts small-molecule
model compounds from mimicking the chemistry of the sMMO
and R2 active sites. As already discussed, the model compounds
form peroxide intermediates similar to those found in the native
protein systems, and they do so with analogous activation
parameters provided that the diiron center is sterically accessible.
Yet these same models cannot activate substrates or perform
catalysis. The reason for this behavior is apparent from the
kinetics of the decay reactions, which are second-order with
respect to complex. In order for a catalyst to generate a highly
energetic intermediate with enough oxidizing potential, for
example, to break a C-H bond, all lower energy pathways
leading to autoxidation must be avoided. The bimolecular reac-
tion uncovered here is one such pathway, knowledge of which
should facilitate the development of strategies to avoid it.
We now consider the nature of the peroxide decomposition
step. In work with two other model compounds, [Fe2(OH)(O2-
CCH3)2(Me3TACN)2](ClO4) and [Fe2(O2CH)4(BIPhMe)2], we
proposed a (µ4-peroxo)diiron(II)diiron(III) transition state.51
Such an activated complex would probably arise by a different
mechanism for peroxide intermediates 2b and 3b for two
reasons. One relates to the apparent irreversibility of their
formation. Once dioxygen reacts with the diiron(II) compounds,
it is impossible to reverse this process at low temperature, even
(µ-1,2-peroxo)diiron(III) intermediate in the case of the models,
or the terminal hydroperoxide with a hydrogen-bond to the oxo-
bridge in Hr, might be subsequent, kinetically silent, steps.
-
3
in vacuum down to 10 Torr. Even warming a solution of 2b
or 3b under vacuum does not regenerate 2a or 3a. The second
reason is based on the relative rates of the formation and decay
of the peroxo intermediates, especially 3b. The half-lives of
the two phases of the reaction differ by 4-5 orders of magnitude
depending on complex concentration. By the time 3b begins
to decompose, no 3a is available as a reactant. For 1a, however,
the reaction with dioxygen is reversible, with a P1/2 of 6 Torr
The measured value of -12.8 cm mol-1 for the activation
volume of the reaction is another parameter which confirms,
along with the negative value of the activation entropy, the
highly structured nature of the transition state. Strongly negative
3
3
-1
volumes of activation (≈-20 cm mol ) were also reported
for the reaction of copper(I) complexes with O2.4
6,57
These
values were interpreted in terms of bond formation accompanied
2
8
at -35 °C in CH2Cl2. Although this binding is reasonably
strong, it is possible that the second-order decomposition results
from reversal of the oxygenation step followed by reaction of
another equivalent of the peroxo intermediate with the resultant
II
by intramolecular electron transfer to produce the Cu -O2
species. By contrast, volumes of activation for the binding of
dioxygen to macrocyclic cobalt(II) complexes were close to
zero and interpreted in terms of a substitution-controlled
binding process.45 In the case of the dioxygen carrier proteins
myoglobin, hemocyanin, and hemerythrin, the volumes of
activation for the binding of dioxygen differ significantly from
those reported above due to influence of the protein environ-
1
a. Given the similarity of the three compounds, however, it
is likely that the decomposition reactions follow similar
pathways, with the only perturbations arising from different
steric constraints.
Since a mechanism in which an equivalent of the peroxide
adduct reacts with the diiron(II) starting material seems unlikely
under our conditions (excess O2 in solution), two possibilities
remain for the decomposition reaction. These possibilities are
presented in Scheme 2. Both fit the kinetic data, resulting in
second-order decay reactions with the loss of an equivalent of
dioxygen. The first pathway (A) is analogous to the decay of
4
7,58
ment.
Solvent Effects. Since water binds to 1a,28 it could poten-
tially affect the kinetics of the oxygenation reaction by blocking
a binding site. Extensive studies with added water, however,
showed no significant effect on the kinetic parameters for
oxidation of 3a in the 2.0-500 mM range. Exploratory work
in acetonitrile and CHCl3 similarly failed to reveal any dramatic
changes. The absolute rates were slightly slower, a factor of
secondary and tertiary alkyl peroxide radicals, which proceeds
59-61
through a tetraoxide intermediate.
Following decomposi-
2
-3, in CHCl3, consistent with a passive role for solvent in
tion, an equivalent of alcohol, an equivalent of ketone, and a
molecule of dioxygen are formed. The other mechanism (B)
involves more conventional nucleophilic attack and dispropor-
these reactions. A significant effect on the extinction coefficient
of 3b was observed as a function of water concentration. The
linear dependence of this effect indicated that it did not arise
from water coordination, which would have a hyperbolic form
16
18
tionation. Mechanism A was evaluated by the O2/ O2-
labeling experiment discussed above. Since a new O-O
bond forms in the decomposition step, the central two
(
57) Goldstein, S.; Czapski, G.; van Eldik, R.; Cohen, H.; Meyerstein, D.
J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1282-1285.
(59) Bartlett, P. D.; Guaraldi, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4799-7801.
(60) Bartlett, P. D.; G u¨ nther, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3288-3294.
(61) Traylor, T. G.; Bartlett, P. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1960, 30-36.
(58) Projahn, H.-D.; Schindler, S.; van Eldik, R.; Fortier, D. G.; Andrew,
C. R.; Sykes, A. G. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 5935-5941.