K. Nihei et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 681–683
683
mM) is lower than ꢀKi (6.4 mM). On the other hand, the
kinetics experiments by chamaecin provided burst ampli-
tude (b-value) (0.43) that is between 0 and 1. Hence, this
molecule dose not completely block the ability of the
enzyme to turnover when bounded to the inhibitor.
2. Xu, Y.; Stokes, A. H.; Freeman, W. M.; Kumer, S. C.;
Vogt, B. A.; Vrana, K. E. Mol. Brain Res. 1997, 45, 159.
3. Prezioso, J. A.; Epperly, M. W.; Wang, N.; Bloomer,
W. D. Cancer Lett. 1992, 63, 73.
4. Kubo, I.; Kinst-Hori, I. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 19.
5. Kubo, I., Kinst-Hori, I. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998. 46,
5338. For recent papers concerned about benzaldehyde
derivatives as a tyrosinase inhibitor, see: Kubo, I.; Kinst-
Hori, I. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4574. Lee, H. S. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 2002. 50, 1400, and Jimenez, M.;
Chazarra, S.; Escribano, J.; Cabanes, J.; Garcıa-Car-
mona, F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001. 49, 4060.
6. Cytotoxic activity of chamaecin against melanoma carci-
noma cells from both human HTB-140and mouse B-16
was found to be greater than 100 mg/mL. Hence, the
depigmenting activity of the cells may be expected at dose
levels causing no cytotoxicity.
Although the precise explanation how chamaecin inter-
acts with the enzyme on a molecular basis is still
unknown, the ability to form a Schiff base with a pri-
mary amino group in the enzyme is more likely. The
2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde that form more
stable Shiff base adducts with a primary amino group
showed more potent activity.4 The Schiff base is expec-
ted to be largely governed by those factors affecting the
stability of the carbon–nitrogen double bond. Since
2-methoxy-4-isopropylbenzaldehyde (9) did not show
any inhibitory activity up to 0.5 mM, the salicylalde-
hyde moiety was requisite to interact with enzyme. In
addition, the partial inhibition kinetics of chamaecin
was probably explained by the fact that the Schiff base
adduct generated is too small to prevent complete
adsorption of the substrate in the active pocket.18
7. Reuter, F. H. Roy. Australian Chem. Inst. J. Proc. 1950,
17, 33.
8. Lin, Y. T.; Wang; K. T.; Chang, L. H. J. Chinese Chem.
Soc. 1963, 10, 139. 2-Hydroxy-4-isopropylbenzaldehyde
was also characterized from E. cneralifolia and designated
as macropone.7,9
.
9. Birch, A. J.; Elliott, P. Aust. J. Chem. 1953, 6, 369.
10. Thoer, A.; Denis, M.; Delmas, M.; Gaset, A. Synth.
Commun. 1988, 18, 2095.
The primary amino group very likely plays an impor-
tant role in the tertiary structure of tyrosinase. For
instance, the amino group in the enzyme may be involved
with hydrogen bonding which is essential to maintain the
tertiary structure of the enzyme. This may be supported
by the previous report that the hydrogen-bonding inter-
actions are known to stabilize the oxy-form of Strepto-
myces glaucescens tyrosinase.19 Chamaecin, a relatively
nonpolar molecule, may form a Schiff base with an
amino group possibly located nearby hydrophobic
region of the enzyme. However, native proteins form a
sort of intramolecular micelle in which the nonpolar
portion is likely to be out of contact in the water based-
test solution. Hence, some substrates first approach the
binuclear active site and form the enzyme-substrate
complex, and then chamaecin forms a Schiff base with a
free primary amino group of the enzyme. The low con-
formational stabilities of native proteins make them
easily susceptible to denaturation by altering the bal-
ance of the weak nonbonding forces that maintain the
native conformation. It appears that chamaecin indir-
ectly disrupts the tertiary structure of the enzyme.
However, the conclusive interpretation remains to be
clarified since the structure of tyrosinase used for this
study has not yet been established.
11. Singh, I. P.; Shukla, V. K.; Dwivedi, A. K.; Khanna,
N. M. Indian J. Chem. 1989, 28B, 692.
12. Iwata, M.; Emoto, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47,
1687.
13. Berbard, A. M.; Ghiani, M. R.; Piras, P. P.; Rivoldini, A.
Synthesis 1989, 287.
14. Chamaecin; IR (film) 3140, 2950, 1650, 1620, 1565, 1500,
1320, 1195, 940 cmÀ1. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 50 0 MHzd, ): 1.26
(d, J=7.0Hz, 6H), 2.92 (sep, J=7.0=Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d,
J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.90(dd, J=1.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J=7.5
Hz, 1H), 9.84 (s, 1H), 11.05 (s, 1H). HRMS-EI [M]+ calcd
1
for C10H12O2 164.0837, found 164.0824. IR and H NMR
spectra are consisted with those reported by Lin, Y. T et al.8
15. The assay was performed as previously reported4 with
slight modifications.20 The commercial mushroom tyro-
sinase purchased from Sigma was purified by the proce-
dure as previously reported.21 All data show that the
mean of three separate experiments and were reproducible
to within 15% of average. The IC50s were obtained by
fitting experimental data to the logistic curve by Sigma
Plot (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
16. Copeland, R. A. Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to
Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis; Wiley: New
York, 2000; pp. 266–304.
17. The partial inhibition curve was fitted to the equation that
was identical to Segel’s mathematical model, see: Segel, I.
Enzyme Kinetics; Wiley: New York, 1975; pp 161–226.
18. Cleland, W. W. In The Enzyme, vol. 2; Boyer, P. D., Ed.;
Academic Press: New York, 1970; p 1–65.
References and notes
19. Jackman, M. P.; Huber, M.; Hajnal, A.; Lerch, K. Bio-
chem. J. 1992, 282, 915.
1. Sanchez-Ferrer, A.; Rodrıguez-Lopez, J. N.; Garcia-
Canovas, F.; Garcıa-Carmona, F. Biochem. Biophys. Acta
1995, 1247, 1.
20. Nihei, K.; Kubo, I. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2409.
21. Espın, J. C.; Wichers, H. J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47,
2638.