J. Xie et al. / Catalysis Communications 66 (2015) 30–33
31
of 40 kV and 40 mA. SEM analyses were performed over a Hitachi
S-4800 electron microscope operating at 2.0 kV. The specific surface
areas of catalysts were determined by BET method based on nitrogen
adsorption–desorption isotherms (at −196 °C) collected over a
Beckman (SA 3100) surface area analyzer. The FT-IR spectra were deter-
mined using a Bruker vector 22 FT-IR spectrophotometer. The CO2-TPD
measurements were conducted on a Micromeritics 2920 apparatus
using thermal conductivity detector. The sample was activated at
550 °C for 1 h prior to the adsorption of CO2 at 100 °C. After purging at
100 °C to remove the physically adsorbed CO2, the sample was heated
to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 and held at 800 °C for 40 min. The ba-
sicity of samples was measured using Hammett indicators after activa-
tion at 550 °C for 3 h as detailed in [25].
(Fig. S1a, b) show sizes of 13.2 and 12.6 nm, respectively. On the other
hand, the crystallite sizes of xwt.%KOH/SnO2 (Fig. S1c–f) are estimated
to be 10.0, 10.5, 11.1 and 9.9 nm at KOH loadings of 0, 10, 20 and
30 wt.%, respectively. The results demonstrate that the use of GO tem-
plate leads to a decrease of crystallinity and an increase in the amount
of defects [27].
3.1.2. SEM
Fig. 1 displays the SEM images of 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2 prepared with or
without the use of GO template. One can see that without the use of GO
template for the preparation of SnO2, the 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2 is irregular
in shape, and agglomeration is obvious. The use of GO as template for
the preparation of SnO2 leads to the formation of uniform nanoparticles
with diameter of ca. 25 nm. We deduce that the basic precursors are an-
chored covalently to GO through functional groups such as carboxyl and
hydroxyl [28]. Thus, the presence of GO template restrains agglomera-
tion of nanoparticles, and shows important effect on the morphology
of 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2.
2.3. Catalyst evaluation
Catalytic activity of the superbases was investigated in the
Knoevenagel condensation of aldehydes with active methylene com-
pounds (Scheme S1, see the supporting information, SI). The catalytic
reactions were conducted in a 25 mL round-bottomed flask at 25 °C
using aldehyde (2 mmol), active methylene reagent (2 mmol), DMF
(dimethylformamide, 1 mL), and catalyst (50 mg). After the reaction,
the catalyst was separated from the mixture by centrifugation, and
the reaction mixtures were analyzed using an Agilent Technologies
7820 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector
and AB-FFAP capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). The con-
version of aldehydes and the yield of products were determined using
biphenyl as internal standard. All the products were analyzed over an
Agilent 6890-5973 MSD GC–MS equipment.
3.1.3. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm
Depicted in Fig. 2 are the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and
pore-size distribution of samples. One can see type-IV isotherms, and
there are hysteresis loops that indicate mesoporosity of materials [3].
The BET surface area and pore volume of SnO2 prepared using GO
template are 39.1 m2 g−1 and 0.137 cm3 g−1, respectively. After the in-
troduction of 20 wt.% KOH, there is a decline of BET surface area and
pore volume (16.1 m2 g−1 and 0.051 cm3 g−1). Meanwhile, the pore-
size distribution suggests uniform pore structure. In addition, the sur-
face area and pore volume of SnO2 prepared without using GO template
are 21.7 m2 g−1 and 0.111 cm3 g−1, whereas those of 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2
with SnO2 prepared without using GO template are 10.0 m2 g−1 and
0.034 cm3 g−1, respectively. It is obvious that the use of GO template
leads to increase of BET surface area and pore volume. It is deduced
that GO promotes the dispersion while restraining the agglomeration
of nanoparticles.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization results
3.1.1. XRD
Fig. S1 (SI) shows the XRD patterns of samples. In Fig. S1c, the SnO2
sample prepared using GO template shows strong diffraction peaks at
2θ of 26.7, 34.1 and 51.7°, which are attributable to the SnO2 phase
(JCPDS no. 41-1445). There is no detection of additional peaks after
the introduction of KOH up to a loading of 20 wt.%, indicating high dis-
persion of KOH on SnO2. It is only at a KOH loading of 30 wt.% that there
is the detection of signals attributable to KOH (JCPDS no. 21-645). Ap-
parently, there exists a dispersion threshold of KOH on SnO2, similar
to the case of KNO3 on zirconia [6] and the case of K2CO3 on alumina
[26]. The spontaneous dispersion capacity of KOH on SnO2 is around
20 wt.%. When KOH loading exceeds 20 wt.%, there is blocking of active
sites and agglomeration of crystallites [12]. It is observed that the SnO2
and 20 wt.% KOH/SnO2 with SnO2 prepared without using GO template
3.1.4. FT-IR
Shown in Fig. S2 (SI) are the IR spectra of as-synthesized SnO2
and 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2. The SnO2 sample exhibits a strong band at
638 cm−1, which is attributable to the anti-symmetric Sn–O–Sn
stretching mode of surface-bridging oxide formed by condensation
of adjacent surface hydroxyl groups. The band at 3420 cm−1 indicates
the presence of hydroxyl groups, which is probably due to water ad-
sorption [29]. After the introduction of KOH, there is the detection of the
1410 cm−1 band attributable to CO23− vibration [30]. The presence of
the 1410 cm−1 band demonstrates that the introduction of KOH
promotes the formation of basic sites and the adsorption of CO2 on the
surface of SnO2. To confirm the functional group on GO, we collected
Fig. 1. SEM images of (a) 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2 with SnO2 prepared using GO template, and (b) 20 wt.%KOH/SnO2 with SnO2 prepared without using GO template.