Edge Article
Chemical Science
P41GM103393). The contents of this publication are solely the
responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent
Conclusions
The synthesis and kinetic analysis of MbA analogues M01 to the official views of NIGMS or NIH.
M11 provides new insight into the structural requirements for
HPA inhibition. The fact that most of the analogues bound
more weakly than mini-MbA highlights the importance of References
MbA's constrained carbohydrate linker. Despite forming no
1
2
World Health Organization, Global Report on Diabetes, 2006,
vol. 6.
E. Adeghate, P. Schattner and E. Dunn, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.,
direct interactions in the active site it appears to pre-stack the
avonol and caffeic acid moieties for optimal interaction. Initial
exploration of the effect of incorporation of rigidity into the
analogue linkers was achieved with the proline linker of M06.
This increased potency some 60-fold compared to the non-
functionalized glycine linker, with more possibly achievable
by freezing out other motions. Affinity enhancement through
the acquisition of stabilising interactions was explored through
the incorporation of phenolic side chains to recruit some of the
hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions ordinarily developed
2
1
006, 1084, 1; K. G. Alberti and P. Z. Zimmet, Diabetic Med.,
998, 15(7), 539.
3
4
A. D. Baron, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 1998, 40, S51.
L. J. Scott and C. M. Spencer, Drugs, 2000, 59(3), 521; K. Kaku,
Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2014, 15(8), 1181; M. Hanefeld, J.
Diabetes Complicat., 1998, 12(4), 228; P. Phillips, J. Karrasch,
R. Scott, D. Wilson and R. Moses, Diabetes Care, 2003, 26(2), 269.
17
5 R. J. Andrade, M. Lucena, J. L. Vega, M. Torres,
F. J. Salmer ´o n, V. Bellot, M. D. Garc ´ı a-Esca n˜ o and
P. Moreno, Diabetes Care, 1998, 21(11), 2029; G. C. Ezeji,
T. Inoue, G. Bahtiyar and A. Sacerdote, BMJ Case Rep.,
by the starch substrate in the amylase active site. Indeed the
phenolic linkers of M10 and M11 take advantage of both such
features, rendering the inhibitors six times as potent as mini-
MbA, and delivering a higher ligand efficiency than either
MbA or mini-MbA (Table S1†). Further, and perhaps surpris-
ingly, the specicity of inhibition is retained despite the
reduction in complexity. Thus M10 and M11 represent amylase
inhibitors that are both much more synthetically accessible and
indeed more potent than the mini-MbA that inspired their
development. With further optimization of their synthesis
underway, pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies with these
inhibitors are planned to determine their suitability for thera-
peutic usage.
2
2
015, 2015; S. A. Cohen, Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics,
016, 3(1), 5.
6
7
G. D. Brayer, Y. Luo and S. G. Withers, Protein Sci., 1995, 4(9),
730; E. H. Rydberg, G. Sidhu, H. C. Vo, J. Hewitt, H. C. C ˆo te,
1
Y. Wang, S. Numao, R. T. MacGillivray, C. M. Overall,
G. D. Brayer and S. G. Withers, Protein Sci., 1999, 8(3), 635.
S. Numao, I. Damager, C. Li, T. M. Wrodnigg, A. Begum,
C. M. Overall, G. D. Brayer and S. G. Withers, J. Biol.
Chem., 2004, 279(46), 48282.
8
9
G. Horne, F. X. Wilson, J. Tinsley, D. H. Williams and
R. Storer, Drug Discovery Today, 2011, 16(3–4), 107.
C. A. Tarling, K. Woods, R. Zhang, H. C. Brastianos,
G. D. Brayer, R. J. Andersen and S. G. Withers,
ChemBioChem, 2008, 9(3), 433.
Experimental section
Please refer to ESI.†
1
0 V. G. Yuen, J. Coleman, S. G. Withers, R. J. Andersen,
G. D. Brayer, S. Mustafa and J. H. McNeill, Mol. Cell.
Biochem., 2016, 411(1–2), 373.
Conflicts of interest
The University of British Columbia has applied for patent
protection on the inhibitors described.
11 L. K. Williams, X. Zhang, S. Caner, C. Tysoe, N. T. Nguyen,
J. Wicki, D. E. Williams, J. Coleman, J. H. McNeill,
V. Yuen, R. J. Andersen, S. G. Withers and G. D. Brayer,
Nat. Chem. Biol., 2015, 11(9), 691.
Acknowledgements
We thank Emily Kwan for purication of HPA and Ethan 12 Revised K for mini-MbA (Fig. S49†).
I
Goddard-Borger for useful discussions at the outset. We 13 E. Lo Piparo, H. Scheib, N. Frei, G. Williamson, M. Grigorov
acknowledge funding from the Canadian Glycomics Network/
and C. J. Chou, J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51(12), 3555.
Networks of Centres of Excellence (Project DO-2) DOI: 14 H. Huang, Q. Jia, J. Ma, G. Qin, Y. Chen, Y. Xi, L. Lin, W. Zhu,
10.13039/501100009056. Portions of this research were carried
J. Ding, H. Jiang and H. Liu, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009, 44(5),
out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC
1982.
National Accelerator Laboratory, which is supported by the U.S. 15 M. Green and J. Berman, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31(41), 2.
Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy 16 K. Tadera, Y. Minami, K. Takamatsu and T. Matsuoka, J.
Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL
Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol., 2006, 52(2), 149.
Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE 17 G. D. Brayer, G. Sidhu, R. Maurus, E. H. Rydberg, C. Braun,
Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the
Y. Wang, N. T. Nguyen, C. M. Overall and S. G. Withers,
NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (including
Biochemistry, 2000, 39(16), 4778.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 11073–11077 | 11077