3456
C. Bressy et al.
LETTER
At first, benzaldehyde (1) was treated with the allyltitani-
um complex (R,R)-Ti6 to afford the corresponding allylic
alcohol 2 with good enantiomeric excess (ee >98%). After
protection of 2 (TBSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, r.t.), com-
pound 3 was isolated in 75% overall yield from 1. The ox-
idative cleavage of the terminal olefin in 3 (OsO4, NaIO4,
2,6-lutidine, dioxane–H2O)7 produced the corresponding
aldehyde which was directly treated with the highly face-
selective complex (R,R)-Ti to afford the 1,3-syn diol 48 in
87% yield (from 2) and with a dr of 95:5. 1,3-Diol 4 was
then involved in a cross-metathesis reaction (CH2Cl2, re-
flux) with the unsaturated ketone 59 (3 equiv) in the pres-
ence of the second-generation Grubbs’ catalyst GII to
lead to the desired 1,7-diarylheptanoid 610 in 75% yield
with a E/Z ratio superior to 95:5 (Scheme 2). Finally,
cleavage of the silylether and subsequent intramolecular
oxy-Michael addition was successfully achieved in one
pot with TBAF (1.5 equiv, THF, r.t.) to furnish (–)-dio-
spongin A in 60% yield, whose physical data (NMR, MS,
[a]D) matched those reported in the literature5,11
(Scheme 2).
Acknowledgment
One of us (F.A.) thanks the ARC (Association pour la Recherche
contre le Cancer) for financial support.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Zhu, J.; Islas-Gonzalez, G.; Bois-Choussy, M. Org. Prep.
Proced. Int. 2000, 32, 505. (b) Claeson, P.; Claeson, U. P.;
Tuchinda, P.; Rentrakul, V. In Studies in Natural Product
Chemistry, Vol. 26; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 2002, 881. (c) Kadota, S.; Tezuka, Y.; Prasaim,
J. K.; Ali, M. S.; Banskota, A. H. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
2003, 3, 203.
(2) (a) Scapagnini, G.; Colombrita, C.; Amadio, M.; D’Agata,
V.; Arcelli, E.; Sapienza, M.; Quattrone, A.; Calabrese, V.
Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 395. (b) Wang, Z.; Zhang,
Y.; Banerjee, S.; Li, Y.; Sarkar, F. H. Cancer 2006, 106,
2503.
(3) Mohamad, H.; Lajis, N. H.; Abas, F.; Ali, A. M.; Sukari, M.
A.; Kibazuki, H.; Nakatani, N. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 285.
(4) Kim, J.-H.; Lee, K. W.; Lee, M.-W.; Lee, H. J.; Kim, S.-H.;
Surh, Y.-J. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 385.
(5) (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Shyamsunder, T.; Prakash, S. J.;
Prabhakar, A.; Jadadeesh, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
47. (b) Sawant, K. B.; Jennings, M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 7911.
(–)-Diospongin A was synthesized in six steps from benz-
aldehyde with an overall yield of 29%. As the methodol-
ogy used to synthesize (–)-diospongin A is versatile,
analogues should be obtained easily for testing.
(6) Hafner, A.; Duthaler, R. O.; Marti, R.; Rihs, G.; Rothe-
Streit, P.; Schwarzenbach, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
2321.
(7) Wensheng, Y.; Yan, M.; Ying, K.; Zhengmao, H.;
ZhenDong, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3217.
O
OH
OTBS
a
b
H
(8) Spectral data for compound 4: 1H NMR (400 MHz): d =
7.28–7.30 (m, 5 H), 5.72–5.86 (m, 1 H), 5.00–5.11 (m, 2 H),
4.80–4.90 (m, 1 H), 3.81–3.90 (m, 1 H), 3.44 (br s, 1 H, OH),
2.09–2.22 (m, 2 H), 1.67–1.97 (m, 2 H), 0.87 (s, 9 H), 0.02
(s, 3 H), –0.27 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz): d = 144.7 (s),
134.7 (d), 128.3 (d), 127.5 (d), 126.0 (d), 117.5 (t), 76.5 (d),
70.6 (d), 46.5 (t), 42.0 (t), 25.8 (q), 18.0 (s), –4.4 (q), –5.1
(q). IR (neat): 3500, 2931, 1256, 908, 732 cm–1. MS (EI,
80 eV): m/z = 306 (1) [M+], 221 (10), 181 (23), 156 (23), 104
(50), 75 (100). [a]D20 –49.9 (c = 0.4, CHCl3).
3
1
2
c
TBSO
OH
TBSO
OH
O
d
O
6
4
(9) Compound 5 was obtained from benzaldehyde in two steps:
addition of vinylmagnesium bromide and oxidation by using
PCC.
e
5
(10) Spectral data for compound 6: 1H NMR (400 MHz): d =
7.13–7.82 (m, 10 H), 7.00–7.07 (dt, J = 7.3, 15.4 Hz, 1 H),
6.88–6.93 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.76–4.80 (m, 1 H), 3.98–
4.08 (m, 1 H), 3.77 (br s, 1 H, OH), 2.39–2.51 (m, 2 H),
1.70–1.95 (m, 2 H), 0.87 (s, 9 H), 0.01 (s, 3 H), –0.27 (s, 3
H). 13C NMR (125 MHz): d = 190.5 (s), 145.5 (d), 144.4 (s),
137.8 (s), 132.7 (d), 128.6 (d), 128.3 (d), 128.1 (d), 127.9 (d),
127.5 (d), 126.0 (d), 76.2 (d), 70.5 (d), 46.7 (t), 40.9 (t), 25.8
(q), 18.0 (s), –4.4 (q), –5.1 (q). IR (neat): 3482, 2929, 1670,
1621, 1063, 700 cm–1. MS (EI, 80 eV): m/z = 309 (5), 207
(75), 131 (70), 103 (77), 75 (100). [a]D20 –30.1 (c = 0.5,
CHCl3).
OH
Ph
Ph
N
N
O
O
O
Mes
Mes
Ph
O
Cl
Cl
Ti
Ru
O
O
PCy3
Ph
Ph
(R,R)-Ti
diospongin A
GII
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (a) (R,R)-Ti, Et2O, –78 °C; (b)
TBSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, r.t. (75%, from 1); (c) (1) OsO4, NaIO4,
2,6-lutidine, dioxane–H2O; (2) (R,R)-Ti, Et2O, –78 °C (87%, from 3);
(d) GII (5% mol), 5 (3 equiv), CH2Cl2, reflux (75%); (e) TBAF, THF,
r.t., 60%.
(11) Yin, J.; Kouda, K.; Tezuka, Y.; Trans, Q. L.; Miyahara, T.;
Chen, Y.; Kadota, S. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 54.
Synlett 2006, No. 20, 3455–3456 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York