Table 1 Tentative band assignments of 8-GA according to 2Dcos during
gel formation process. Corresponding mid-IR spectra can be consulted in
the ESI
have larger surface than spherical micelles to be surrounded by
more water molecules, which may also account for the too large
surface energy to make the helices stable.10b
Wavenumber (cmꢁ1
)
Assignments
Therefore, we can draw a conclusion that the gelation process
of 8-GA upon cooling can be described in microdynamics as
follows: all group motions have a continuous transfer from the
octyl tail to the chiral carbohydrate head followed by the final
immobilization of the solvent, which meanwhile, is actually
a continuous dehydration process from the hydrophobic core to
the outer hydrophilic chiral head. Both the two directions have
been presented in Scheme 1.
7116
6912
6856
6698
6561
6295
2v(O–H in water)
2v(O–H in 8-GA)
Self-associated
H-bonded with water
H-bonded with C]O 2v(N–H in 8-GA)
H-bonded with water
0
2vas(C–H in C1 H2)
0
5907
5884, 5859, 5843
5824, 5811, 5772, 5758 In gel
2vas(C–H in C8 H3)
0
0
2vas(C–H in C2 ꢁ7 H2)
5795
5708
5685
5664
In solution
Conclusions
2v(C–H in C1ꢁ5H)
0
0
Hydrated
Dehydrated
2vs(C–H in C2 ꢁ7 H2)
In this paper, NIR spectroscopy in combination with 2Dcos and
PCMW is employed to illustrate the gelation microdynamic
mechanism of 8-GA in water. Two regions involving NH-, OH-
and CH-related overtones are focused on to trace nearly all the
group motions of 8-GA upon cooling. According to conven-
tional NIR analysis, all CH-related overtones exhibit an
apparent band shift to lower frequencies and a band splitting
phenomenon. It reveals that the octyl chains of 8-GA experi-
enced a dehydration process during gel formation resulting in
a much tight and ordered hydrophobic core. Boltzmann fitting
and PCMW have determined the transition temperature to be ca.
72 ꢀC and the gelation temperature range 70–75 ꢀC. According to
2Dcos results, we obtained such sequential orders as follows:
0
0
(in solution) / 2vs(C–H in C2 ꢁ7 H2) (hydrated) / 2vas(C–H in
0
0
0
0
C2 ꢁ7 H2) (in gel) / 2vs(C–H in C2 ꢁ7 H2) (dehydrated) /
0
2vas(C–H in C1 H2) / 2v(N–H in 8-GA) (H-bonded with water)
/ 2v(N–H in 8-GA) (H-bonded with C]O) / 2v(C–H in
C1ꢁ5H) / 2v(O–H in 8-GA) (self-associated) / 2v(O–H in
8-GA) (H-bonded with water) / 2v(O–H in water).
Not considering different vibrational modes and states (gel or
solution, hydrated or dehydrated, and H-bonding types), we
0
0
0
0
always have C8 H3 / C2 ꢁ7 H2 / C1 H2 / N–H / C1ꢁ5H /
O–H in 8-GA / O–H in water. It is notable that during the
gelation process of 8-GA, all group motions have a continuous
transfer from the octyl tail to the chiral carbohydrate head
through amide linkage followed by the final immobilization of
the solvent. This transfer of groups motions can be interpreted to
the sequential or successive response of specific groups (reflected
by changes of spectral intensities) to the cooling temperature.
That means the octyl tail has an earlier response to temperature
than amide linkage and chiral carbohydrate head during the
gelation process. Judging from earlier conventional NIR anal-
ysis, this response is actually a dehydration process. Therefore,
we can conclude that the driving force of the gelation process in
microdynamics can only be the dehydration process of hydro-
phobic octyl chains, which have not been paid enough attention
in previous studies. Due to the late response upon cooling, chiral
carbohydrate head has an obvious stabilizing effect on the gel
state, which can be attributed to the ‘‘chiral bilayer effect’’,12
responsible for the formation of helical aggregates. As the
linkage both structurally and in group motions, hydrogen
bonding of amide groups are also essential for the formation of
much ordered bilayer superstructures. As reported, no gel can be
formed in N-methylated 8-GA.9a
0
0
0
0
C8 H3 / C2 ꢁ7 H2 / C1 H2 / N–H / C1ꢁ5H / O–H in 8-GA
/ O–H in water. Thus the gelation microdynamic mechanism of
8-GA can be concluded that all the group motions have
a continuous transfer from the octyl tail to the chiral carbohy-
drate head followed by the final immobilization of the solvent,
which meanwhile, is actually a continuous dehydration process
from the hydrophobic core to the outer hydrophilic chiral head.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by National Science
Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 20934002, 51073043) and the
National Basic Research Program of China (No.
2009CB930000).
References
1 (a) Y. Lin, Y. Qiao, C. Gao, P. Tang, Y. Liu, Z. Li, Y. Yan and
J. Huang, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 6711–6717; (b) J. C. Tiller,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3072–3075; (c) K. Y. Lee and
D. J. Mooney, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1869–1880.
2 L. A. Estroff and A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 1201–1218.
3 K. Hanabusa, M. Yamada, M. Kimura and H. Shirai, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1949–1951.
Now we turn to examine the effect of solvent on the confor-
mation changes of 8-GA. The hydrophobic octyl chains experi-
enced an obvious dehydration process, which have been
discussed in conventional NIR analysis. The amide linkages have
a transformation of hydrogen bonds from N-H.OH2 to N–H.
O]C ones, resulting in a more contact assembly. Actually, this is
also a dehydration process. For chiral carbohydrate head
groups, OH would absorb more water in the gel state upon
cooling than in solution as the sequence order of 2v(O–H in
8-GA) (self-associated) is prior to 2v(O–H in 8-GA) (H-bonded
with water). It is feasible that the obtained curved bilayer fibers
4 (a) G. Li, W. Fudickar, M. Skupin, A. Klyszcz, C. Draeger, M. Lauer
and J. H. Fuhrhop, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1828–1852; (b)
H. Y. Lee, S. R. Nam and J. I. Hong, Chem.–Asian J., 2009, 4, 226–
235.
5 (a) T. Lin, R. Ho, C. Sung and C. Hsu, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 1404–
1409; (b) J. Cu, Y. Zheng, Z. Shen and X. Wan, Langmuir, 2010, 26,
15508–15515; (c) Y. Lin, A. Wang, Y. Qiao, C. Gao, M. Drechsler,
J. Ye, Y. Yan and J. Huang, Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 2031–2036.
6 (a) J. Jung, J. Rim, E. Cho, S. Lee, I. Jeong, N. Kameda, M. Masuda
and T. Shimizu, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 7449–7456; (b) A. Meister,
S. Drescher, G. Karlsson, G. Hause, U. Baumeister, G. Hempel,
V. M. Garamus, B. Dobner and A. Blume, Soft Matter, 2010, 6,
1317–1324.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 6451–6456 | 6455