of oxidation at purely aliphatic sites with 70-85% retention
of configuration has been reported by action of chromic
acid.11
The enantiospecificity of the reaction changed from high
to moderate on prolonging the reaction time. Assuming that
this decrease in the enantiospecificity was due to in situ
racemization of the formed alcohol 3a under catalysis by
traces of hydrofluoric acid (generated by the hydrolytic
decomposition of azaalkene 4 or present in oxaziridine 1),
we performed the oxyfunctionalization reaction in the
presence of metal fluorides which are known to work as
effective scavengers of HF.18 Indeed, the decrease of optical
purity at long reaction times was definitively retarded and
potassium fluoride was slightly more effective than cesium
fluoride.
On treatment of the two citronellyl derivatives 2b,c19 with
oxaziridine 1, almost complete retention of configuration20
has been observed, thus confirming the enantiospecific
character of the hydroxylation reaction performed by the
oxaziridine. Oxyfunctionalization reactions in general21 and
those performed by oxaziridines too13 are retarded by the
presence of electron-withdrawing functional groups near the
reaction center. This is consistent with the fact that oxidation
reactions are electrophilic in nature and the presence of
functionalities decreases the electron density at the reaction
Perfluoro-cis-2,3-dialkyloxaziridines are powerful yet se-
lective oxidizing reagents12 and have already proven their
efficiency also in the regioselectiVe, site-selectiVe, and
diastereoselectiVe hydroxylation of Various hydrocarbon
substrates.13 Herein we describe the effectiveness of per-
fluoro-cis-2-n-butyl-3-n-propyloxaziridine (1) in the enan-
tiospecific oxyfunctionalization of nonactiVated hydrocarbons
under remarkably mild reaction conditions.
Treatment of (R)-2,6-dimethyloctane (2a) with oxaziridine
1 at room temperature cleanly furnished 3-octanol 3a having
the (S) absolute configuration (Table 1).14,15 The reaction did
Table 1. Enantiospecific Oxyfunctionalization of Citronellyl
Derivatives 2a-c
(9) Deno, N. C.; Messer, L. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976,
1051. Muller, W.; Schneider, H.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18,
407. Barton, D. H. R.; Chabot, B. M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 511.
(10) Bargues, V.; Blay, G.; Cardona, L.; Garcia, B.; Pedro, J. R.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1845. Bernini, R.; Mincione, E.; Sanetti, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4651. Cerre`, C.; Hofmann, A. F.; Schteingart,
C. D. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 435. Bovicelli, P.; Lupattelli, P.; Mincione,
E. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5052. Bovicelli, P.; Gambacorta, P.; Lupattelli,
P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 48, 7411. Asensio, G.; Mello, R.; Gonzalez-
Nunez, M. E.; Boix, C.; Royo, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2373. Brown,
D. S.; Marples, B. A.; Muxworthy, J. P.; Baggaley, K. H. J. Chem. Res.,
Synop. 1992, 28. Marples, B. A.; Muxworthy, J. P.; Baggaley, K. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 533.
(11) Wiberg, K. B.; Foster, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 423.
(12) Petrov, V. A.; Resnati, G. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1809. Bernardi,
R.; Novo, B.; Resnati, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1996, 2517. Farina,
A.; Meille, S. V.; Resnati, G. J. Fluorine Chem. 1996, 80, 47. Arnone, A.;
DesMarteau, D. D.; Novo, B.; Petrov, V. A.; Pregnolato, M.; Resnati, G.
J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8805. Sorochinsky, A. A.; Petrenko, A. E.; Kukhar,
V. P.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Resnati, G. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 5995. Arnone,
A.; Novo, B.; Pregnolato, M.; Resnati, G.; Terreni, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 6401. Arnone, A.; Metrangolo, P.; Novo, B.; Resnati, G. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 7831. Resnati, G.; Temperini, A.; Testaferri, L.; Tiecco, M.;
Tingoli, M. Carbohydr. Lett. 1998, 3, 39.
% ee
reactn
time (h) added salta
configuration
retention %
substr
X
Y
2
3
(R)-2a
(R)-2a
(R)-2a
(R)-2a
(R)-2a
(R)-2a
H
H
1
9
1
9
9
9
81 78
81 48
96
59
97
96
89
88
98
97
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
KF (1 equiv) 81 79
KF (1 equiv) 81 78
CsF (1 equiv) 81 72
CsF (2 equiv) 81 71
99 97
(S)-2b Cl Br
(S)-2c OH Br
30
21
99 96
a Equivalents of added salt with respect to 1 equiv of substrate 2.
(13) DesMarteau, D. D.; Donadelli, A.; Montanari, V.; Petrov, V.;
Resnati, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4897. Arnone, A.; Cavicchioli,
M.; Montanari, V.; Resnati, G. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5511. Arnone, A.;
Bernardi, R.; Cavicchioli, M.; Resnati, G. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2314.
(14) All the reactions here described have been performed on both
racemic and nonracemic substrates 2, 5, and 7. The optical purity of any
substrate and product (but 2a) was established unequivocally through GLC
analyses on chiral columns (see Supporting Information), and the stereo-
specificity of the process was thus established. The optical purity of 2a
could not be established by chiral GLC and was determined through the
optical purity of (R)-2,6-dimethyl-2-octanol (3d, ref 15) whose signals in
the 1H NMR spectrum showed a clear splitting in the presence of Eu(hfc)3
(see Supporting Information).
(15) Oxyfunctionalization by oxaziridine 1 is known to occur selectively
at tertiary sites (ref 13). Consistent with this regioselectivity (R)-2a was
attacked by the oxaziridine 1 at both C-6 and C-2 to give (S)-3,7-dimethyl-
3-octanol (3a) and (R)-2,6-dimethyl-2-octanol (3d), respectively, in an
approximate 1:1 ratio.
(16) Substrates 2, 5, and 7 and corresponding oxyfunctionalized products
3, 6, and 8 which have the same geometry at the stereogenic center are
assigned to the opposite absolute configuration due to the CIP rules.
(17) Schneider, H. J.; Muller, W. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 4609. Kirmse,
W.; Rauleder, G.; Ratajczak, H.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4142.
(18) This hypothesis was also supported by control experiments where
HF was bubbled in the solution of 3a prior to the addition of 1. The formed
alcohol 3a was nearly racemic.
occur with retention of configuration16 as demonstrated by
chemical correlation with 3-octanol 3a obtained from the
oxidation of (R)-2a with peracids which are known to work
with preferential retention of configuration.17
(6) Crabtree, R. H. Chem. ReV. 1985, 85, 245. Launay, F.; Roucoux, A.;
Patin, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1353. Marko′, I. E.; Giles, P. R.;
Tsukazaki, M.; Chelle´-Regnaut, I.; Urch, C. J.; Brown, S. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 12661. Tenaglia, A.; Terranova, E.; Waegell, B. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 5523. Newcomb, M.; Simakov, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 965. Barton, D. H. R. Synlett. 1997, 229. Schroder, D.; Schwarz,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8818. Fish, R. H.; Fong, R. H.; Vincent,
J. B.; Christou, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 1504. Mimoun,
H.; Saussine, L.; Daire, E.; Postel, M.; Fischer, J.; Weiss, Raymond J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3101. Smegal, J. A.; Hill, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1983, 105, 3515.
(7) Cohen, Z.; Keinan, E.; Mazur, Y.; Varkony, T. H. J. Org. Chem.
1975, 40, 2141. Olah, G. A.; Yoneda, N.; Parker, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1976, 98, 5261. Giamalva, D. H.; Church, D. F.; Pryor, W. A. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 3429. Hellman, T. M.; Hamilton, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 1530.
(8) Rozen, S.; Brand, M.; Kol, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 45, 8325.
282
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 2, 1999