V. V. Namboodiri, R. S. Varma / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1143–1146
1145
Figure 1. Yield versus water content. Effect of water content on the reaction of benzyl alcohol (100 mmol) with DHP (110 mmol)
in the presence of AlCl3·6H2O catalyst (1 mmol).
cm length, 0.5 cm diameter) with petroleum ether (ꢀ4
between the US Department of Energy and the US
Environmental Protection Agency.
ml) to obtain pure THP ether (99%).4
All the THP ethers are known compounds and were
characterized by spectral analyses, comparison with
authentic samples (GC and NMR), and also by regen-
eration of the corresponding alcohols or phenols. The
regeneration experiments also reaffirmed that there
were no other side reactions occurring during THP
ether formation.
References
1. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1999 and references cited therein.
2. (a) Nishiguchi, T.; Kawamine, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1990, 1766; (b) Nishiguchi, T.; Fujisaki, S.;
Kuroda, M.; Kajisaki, K.; Saitoh, M. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 8183; (c) Chandrasekhar, S.; Takhi, M.; Reddy,
R.; Mohapatra, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4405.
3. (a) Deka, N.; Sarma, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1947;
(b) Deka, N.; Sarma, J. C. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30,
4435 and references cited therein.
Deprotection of THP ethers: THP ether (100 mmol),
aluminum chloride (1 mmol) and excess methanol (800
mmol) were mixed together at room temperature for 30
min affording complete regeneration of the alcohol.
The cleavage of THP ethers and regeneration of alco-
hols was similarly followed by GC. The reaction mix-
ture was filtered through a short silica column (eluted
with petroleum ether). Isolated yield of benzyl alcohol
after deprotection was 96%.
4. Bongini, A.; Cardillo, G.; Orena, M.; Sandri, S. Synthesis
1979, 618.
5. Olah, G. A.; Husain, A.; Singh, B. P. Synthesis 1983, 892.
6. (a) Kumar, P.; Dinesh, C. U.; Reddy, R. S.; Pandey, B.
Synthesis 1993, 1069; (b) Ballini, R.; Bigi, F.; Carloni, S.;
Maggi, R.; Sartori, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4169;
(c) Rodriguez, I.; Climent, M. J.; Iborra, S.; Fornes, V.;
Corma, A. J. Catal. 2000, 192, 441.
7. (a) Hoyer, S.; Laszlo, P.; Orlovic, M.; Polla, E. Synthesis
1986, 655; (b) Heravi, M. M.; Ajami, D.; Ghassemzadeh,
M. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 1013.
8. (a) Ranu, B. C.; Saha, M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 8269;
(b) Campelo, J. M.; Garcia, A.; Lafont, F.; Luna, D.;
Marinas, J. M. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 1345.
9. Bandgar, B. P.; Jagtap, S. R.; Aghade, B. B.;
Wadgaonkar, P. P. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 2211.
10. Naik, S.; Gopinath, R.; Patel, B. K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 7679.
In conclusion, the present method describes an efficient
and practical alternative to the protection and depro-
tection of alcohols and phenols as tetrahydropyranyl
ethers. The significant advantages of this methodology
are mild reaction conditions, absence of volatile sol-
vent, faster reaction rates, high substrate to catalyst
ratios, and ease of protection and deprotection with the
same catalyst. We predict that this method will find
useful application for the protection and deprotection
of the alcohols in modern synthetic chemistry.
Acknowledgements
V.V.N. is a postgraduate research participant at the
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science
and Education through an interagency agreement
11. Molnar, A.; Beregszaszi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
8597.
12. Branco, L. C.; Afonso, C. A. M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57,
4405.