Organic Letters
Letter
as the coupling partner (Figure 1b, middle).9b Kozlowski and
Pappo have shown that the steric and/or electronic properties
of the coupling partner, such as strength of binding to the
metal catalyst, oxidation potential, and nucleophilicity, are
crucial factors for establishing cross-selective coupling.11,15,16
Further development of the methodologies for cross-selective
oxidative coupling has remained a current topic in these fields
and is intensively studied.17 As described in the previous report
on iron-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling (Figure 1b, right),
chemoselective synthesis of chiral C1-symmetric bis(arenol)s
via enantioselective oxidative coupling with electronically
similar arenols without a directing group remains a challenge.11
In the present work, we found that (aqua)ruthenium(salen)
complexes 1 show efficient and unique catalysis in the cross-
selective oxidative coupling of arenols (Figure 1c). Ruthenium-
catalyzed oxidative coupling between two arenols with little
difference in their electronic characters (e.g., ΔEox = 0.01 V),
produces the corresponding C1-symmetric bis(arenol)s with
good to high cross- and enantioselectivies.
Scheme 1. Preliminary Studies of Asymmetric Oxidative
Coupling of 2-Naphthols Using Ruthenium(salen) Catalysts
to high enantioselectivity.19,20 Under 1c-catalyzed conditions,
we further investigated the homocoupling in the presence of
brominated 2-naphthols that have similar oxidation poten-
tials.19 6-Bromo-2-naphthol exhibited higher reactivity than 3-
or 7-bromo-2-naphthol despite numerous reports indicating
high reactivities for oxidative coupling of C3- or C7-substituted
2-naphthols, including 3- or 7-bromo-2-naphthol.5−9 The
reason for this substituent effect for these 2-naphthols in
ruthenium-catalyzed reactions presently remains unclear.
However, the substituents at C3 or C7 of the 2-naphthol
might individually suppress homocouplings because of the
steric repulsion with complex 1c and/or the radical cation
intermediates.
We recently found that ruthenium(salen) complexes are
efficient catalysts for aerobic asymmetric oxidations.6,18
Mechanistic studies showed that under aerobic conditions,
radical cation intermediate B was formed via single electron
transfer (SET) and radical delocalization (Figure 2a).18c,e This
Intrigued by these considerations, we began to study the
asymmetric oxidative cross-coupling between C7- and C3-
substituted 2-naphthols A and B with complex 1c as the
catalyst (Table 1). A 1:1 mixture of 7- and 3-bromo-2-
naphthol with a 5.0 mol % loading of 1c gave C1-symmetric
bis(arenol) 3a with high chemo- and enantioselectivity (entry
1). Despite the axiom proposed in previous reports,11,15,16 we
achieved excellent results for the cross-coupling with only a
slight difference in the oxidation potential between the two
coupling partners (ΔEox = 0.10 V). The chemical yield and
chemoselectivity could be improved by using a slight excess of
the coupling partner (entry 2). Encouraged by these results, we
further conducted the reaction with a combination of C3- and
C7-substituted 2-naphthols using complex 1c as the catalyst.
The desired cross-coupling products 3 were produced as the
major products in every combination with good to high
enantioselectivities regardless of the magnitudes of their
oxidation potentials (entries 3−14).19 Higher cross-selectivity
was observed when a relatively bulky phenyl group was
introduced at C3 of the 2-naphthol compared with the other
C3-substituted 2-naphthols. To our delight, the combinations
using electron-rich arenols, even if they were easily oxidizable
and preferred homocoupling,21 could be applied to our
catalytic conditions, yielding good to high cross-selectivity
(entries 15−19). The cross-selectivity and yield were improved
without reducing the enantioselectivies when the temperature
was increased to 40 °C (entries 15−17, values in parentheses).
These results indicated that the steric factor of the substituent
groups had a stronger effect on the cross-selectivity than the
electronic characters of the coupling partners.
Figure 2. (a) Possible oxidation mechanism for the ruthenium-
catalyzed alcohol oxidation. (b) Working hypothesis for the cross-
selective oxidative coupling using Ru(salen) as the catalyst.
mechanism suggests that arenols could be oxidized to the
corresponding electrophilic radical intermediates and then
converted to the desired bis(arenol)s (Figure 2b). Moreover,
we envisioned that if the ruthenium catalyst promoted the C−
C bond-forming process for the cross-coupling reaction
preferentially while simultaneously suppressing the homocou-
pling reaction, the cross-coupling might proceed in spite of the
similar electronic natures of coupling partners.
On the basis of these considerations, we began our
investigation to find an efficient oxidative arenol coupling
catalyst using 2-naphthol as the ideal test substrate (Scheme
1). The reaction in the presence of 1a produced BINOL 2a
quantitatively but in nearly racemic form. The enantioselec-
tivity of the reaction could be improved by using a catalyst
bearing an aryl group at C2″ on the binaphthyl unit, such as 1b
or 1c. After extensive screening, we found that complex 1c led
We further conducted the cross-coupling between 2-
naphthols and phenols, which are typically less oxidizable
than naphthols; however, they act as good nucleophiles
(Scheme 2).15 To achieve this combination, we examined
the cross-coupling of m-xylenol with 3-methoxy-2-naphthol.
The reaction mixture gave the desired cross-coupling products
with good chemoselectivity and moderate regioselectivity
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX