5922 Ogoshi and Chujo
Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 16, 2004
interaction and should hinder the formation of the ionic
interaction between PAA and APTEOS. The same trend
was observed in the polymer hybrid using sulfonic acid
groups of poly(styrenesulfonic acid) (PSSA) and amine
moieties of APTEOS.19
sample using NVOC-U-PTEOS with photoirradiation
(Table 2, run 5), some particles or aggregation at 10 000
magnifications were also not found (Figure 6d). These
results suggest that silica is dispersed at the nanometer
level in the hybrid materials.
As shown in Scheme 3, photoresist like polymer
hybrids could be prepared using this preparation method.
In the case of the sol state (liquid phase) of the polymer
hybrids, the patterning using this approach is difficult
because of the strong migration tendency. But, the sol
state of the hybrid became the gel state according to
the proceeding of the sol-gel reaction of alkoxysilane.
In the gel stage, the migration tendency should be
inhibited and the photoresist like polymer hybrids
should be obtained. It is considered that the controlling
of the UV irradiation timing and time can accomplish
the preparation of the photoresist hybrid in this ap-
proach. This work is now under investigation.
Evid en ce of Ion ic In ter a ction betw een P AA a n d
NVOC-U-P TEOS a fter P h otoir r a d ia tion . The ionic
interaction between carboxylic acid groups of PAA and
amine groups resulted from nonprotected NVOC-U-
PTEOS by photoirradiation could be checked by FT-IR
and 1H NMR measurements as well as previously
described ionic interaction between PAA and APTEOS.
Unfortunately, it was difficult to observe the shift of Cd
O groups due to overlap with the band from phenyl
groups around 1590 cm-1. Therefore, 1H NMR was
utilized to examine the ionic interaction between car-
boxylic acid groups of PAA and amine groups of NVOC-
U-PTEOS after photoirradiation.
Con clu sion s
The transparency of polymer hybrids utilizing caged
alkoxysilane (NVOC-U-PTEOS) could be controlled by
photoirradiation because caged alkoxysilane was changed
to nonprotected alkoxysilane by utilizing photoirradia-
tion and the ionic interaction formed between carboxylic
acid groups of PAA and amine groups of nonprotected
alkoxysilane. This strong ionic interaction could be
confirmed by FT-IR and 1H NMR spectra. The resist-
like polymer hybrids could be obtained utilizing this
idea. This novel photosensitive polymer hybrid using the
biochemical concept of the caged compound is the first
example and gives beneficial clues in the field of
materials science.
Refer en ces a n d Notes
(1) Wen, J .; Wilkes, G. L. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1667.
(2) Loym, D. A.; Shea, K. J . Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1431.
(3) Novak, B. M. Adv. Mater. 1993, 5, 422.
(4) Giannelis, E. P. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 29.
(5) Chujo, Y.; Tamaki, R. MRS Bull. 2001, 26, 389.
(6) Special issue for organic-inorganic nanocomposite materials.
Chem. Mater. 2001, 13.
(7) Tamaki, R.; Chujo, Y.; Kuraoka, K.; Yazawa, T. J . Mater.
Chem. 1999, 8, 1741.
(8) Ogoshi, T.; Itoh, H.; Kim, K. M.; Chujo, Y. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 1741.
As shown in Figure 5b, the proton peak of the
methoxy groups of NVOC moieties, which were observed
around 3.8-4.0 ppm, was shifted to about 3.6 ppm after
UV irradiation. The shift resulted from the photocleav-
age. This observation was similar to the case of previ-
ously reported.30 Furthermore, the new peak around
2.92 ppm was observed after photoirradiation in the
sample of PAA/NVOC-U-PTEOS (1/1) in CD3OD com-
pared to Figure 5a (the same sample before photoirra-
diation). This peak consisted of the alkyl peak of the
sample of the PAA/APTEOS in CD3OD (Figure 3b). This
result indicates the ionic interaction between amine
groups generated from NVOC-U-PTEOS with photo-
irradiation and carboxylic acid groups of PAA. The
efficiency of the formation of the ionic interaction was
about 15%, which was calculated by the integration of
the peak at 2.92 ppm. The percentage was slightly
small, but it should be enough to obtain the transparent
polymer hybrid because ionic interaction was stronger
than the other kinds of physical interaction such as
hydrogen bond and aromatic interaction.
(9) Bohren, C. F.; Huffman, D. R. Absorption and Scattering of
Light by Small Particles; Wiley: New York, 1983.
(10) Brinker, C. J .; Scherer, G. W. Sol-Gel Science, The Physics
and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing; Academic Press: San
Diego, 1990.
(11) Wei, Y.; J in, D.; Brennan, D. J .; Rivera, D. N.; Zhuang, Q.;
DiNardo, N. J .; Qiu, K. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 769.
(12) Sun, C.-C.; Mark, J . E. Polymer 1989, 30, 104.
(13) Wei, Y.; Yeh, J .-M.; J in, D.; J ia, X.; Wang, J . Chem. Mater.
1995, 7, 969.
(14) Chujo, Y.; Ihara, E.; Kure, S.; Saegusa, T. Macromolecules
1993, 26, 5681.
(15) Chujo, Y.; Matsuki, H.; Kure, S.; Saegusa, T.; Yazawa, T. J .
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 635.
(16) Chujo, Y.; Saegusa, T. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1992, 100, 11.
(17) Tamaki, R.; Samura, K.; Chujo, Y. Chem. Commun. 1998,
1131.
(18) Tamaki, R.; Han, S. Y.; Chujo, Y. Polym. Prepr. J pn. 1998,
47, 1016.
(19) Tamaki, R.; Chujo, Y. Chem. Mater. 1999, 7, 1719.
(20) Hess, G. P. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 989.
(21) Cameron, J . F.; Fre´chet, J . M. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 4303.
(22) Muralidharan, S.; Nerbonne, J . M. J . Photochem. Photobiol.
B 1995, 27, 123.
SEM Im a ges of P olym er Hybr id s. The miscibility
of organic and inorganic phase was confirmed by SEM
(Figure 6). As shown in Figure 6a, the sample with
TEOS (Table 1, run 4) showed phase separation between
organic polymer and silica gel at about 3000 magnifica-
tions. The white parts indicate silica particles. The
white particles about 1 µm could be clearly observed.
The turbid polymer hybrids using NVOC-U-PTEOS
without photoirradiation (Table 2, run 6) also showed
honeycomb-like phase separation at 1000 magnifications
(Figure 6b). However, in the case of the transparent
PAA/silica hybrid using APTEOS (Table 1, run 1),
aggregations of silica were not observed even at about
10 000 magnifications (Figure 6c). In the transparent
(23) Calvet, D.; Collet, A.; Viguier, M.; Berrer, J .-F.; Se´re´ro, Y.
Macromolecules 2003, 36, 449.
(24) Wang, D.-A.; J i, J .; Feng, L.-X. Macromolecules 2000, 33,
8472.
(25) Chamorro, G.; Gardun˜o, L.; Sa´nchez, A.; Labarrios, F.;
Salazar, M.; Mart´ınez, E.; D´ıaz, F.; Tamariz, J . Drug Dev.
Res. 1998, 43, 105.
(26) Mori, H.; Lanzendo¨rfer, M. G.; Mu¨ller, A. H. E. Langmuir
2004, 20, 1934.
(27) Feher, F. J .; Wyndham, K. D.; Soulivong, D.; Nguyen, F. J .
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 1491.
(28) Zhang, Z. Y.; Smith, B. D. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999, 10, 1150.
(29) Ottl, J .; Gabriel, D.; Mariott, G. Bioconjugate Chem. 1998,
9, 143.
(30) Kevwitch, R. M.; McGrath, D. V. Synthesis 2002, 9, 1171.
MA0400057