H.L. Dong et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 615 (2014) 433–439
437
The previous reports about Fd-3 m average cubic pyrochlores
A B
It is suggested that the tolerance factor (t) as well as the r /r
0
structure of (Bi1.5Zn0.42)(Zn0.5Nb1.5)O
6
O
0.92 is employed as the
value and lattice energies (U) can provide an indication of the
structural stability of the (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN pyrochlores
initial structural model for the Rietveld refinement [36]. For the
purposes of the following calculations of the tolerance factor (t),
the 4% vacancy concentration reported for the A site and the 8%
A B
(x 6 0.4). The tolerance factor (t) and the r /r for the cubic pyroch-
lores are derived from the geometrical aspects, and similar results
are obtained from these two different parameters calculations. The
0
vacancy concentration reported for the O site were ignored i.e.,
0
the stoichiometry of the (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN cubic pyrochlores
positional parameter x has been taken into account in the toler-
are effectively assumed as (Bi1.5+0.5x
M
0.5ꢀ0.5x)(M0.5+x/6Nb1.5ꢀx/6
)
ance factor (t) calculation, which gives further insight into the
details of the structural stability features in the (1ꢀx) BMN–x
b_BZN cubic pyrochlores.
0
O
6
O
1
(M = Mg & Zn). Considering the divalent cation distribution
2+
2+
in the Bi-based pyrochlores, i.e. the Zn and Mg occupy both
the A- and B-sites, the proposed chemical formula for structure
refinement with different cation distributions in A- and B-sites of
0
the (Bi1.5+0.5x
M
0.5ꢀ0.5x)(M0.5+x/6Nb1.5ꢀx/6)O
6
O
1
(M = Mg, Zn) cubic
/r
B
3.4. Correlation of crystal structure, phase stability and dielectric
properties
pyrochlores (x 6 0.4) and their corresponding relative
values are listed in Table 3. The initial atoms position for
r
A
0
(
Bi1.5+0.5xM0.5ꢀ0.5x)(M0.5+x/6Nb1.5ꢀx/6)O
6
O
1
(M = Mg, Zn) pyrochlores
r
Fig. 6 present the variations of the dielectric constants (e ) and
(
x 6 0.4) based on their proposed chemical formula are shown in
apparent densities of (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN ceramics as a function
Table 4.
The Rietveld refinement of the structure is carried out using the
of b_BZN content.
r
The dielectric constant (e ) of the specimen increases to a max-
program Fullprof suite toolbar. The results of the structural infor-
imum value and thereafter it decreases with the x increasing, as
mation refined by Rietveld method are shown in Table 5.where a
is the lattice parameter, V is the unit cell volume, x is the variable
shown in Fig. 6. According to the variation trend of the dielectric
0
constant (
regions are distinguished, i.e. (1) 0 6 x 6 0.4, cubic pyrochlores
region, the dielectric constant ( ) increases with increasing x and
reached the maximum at x = 0.4; (2) 0.6 6 x < 1, mixture phase
region, the dielectric constant ( ) decreases with increasing x.
r
e ) and phase structure evolution of the specimens, two
atom position parameter of the oxygen which located at Wyckoff
0
position 48f (x , 1/8, 1/8), t is the tolerance factor and U is the lattice
e
r
energies, respectively.
0
The x parameter shows a decrease trend as increasing b_BZN
e
r
0
content, and different x value can be obtained based on different
Allowing for the XRD results, phase transformation occurs at
x > 0.6. The phase structure is cubic pyrochlores in the specimens
0
chemical formula models. The variation of the x parameter indi-
cates the distortion of the unit cell, and the distortion due to the
difference of the ionic size and distribution between A and B-site
would be determined and correlated to the stability of the struc-
ture. The tolerance factor (t) and lattice energies (U) are also shown
in Table 5. The results show that both the tolerance factor (t) and
lattice energy (U) present decrease trend as increasing b_BZN con-
with x 6 0.4. The dielectric constant (
cubic pyrochlores (x 6 0.4) increases with x increasing, and the lar-
ger dielectric constant ( ) of the cubic Bi-rich pyrochlores is
e
r
) of (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN
e
r
expected. Given that the expected dielectric polarizability per vol-
0
ume unit for (Bi1.5+0.5x
M
0.5ꢀ0.5x)(M0.5+x/6Nb1.5ꢀx/6)O
6
O
1
(M = Mg &
Zn, x 6 0.4) , which is calculated using the empirical ion polariz-
abilities that were derived by Shannon, [37] is significantly higher
0
tent, which is consist with the trend of the x parameter. Fig. 5
shows the variation of the tolerance factor (t) calculated based
than that for (Bi1.5Mg0.5)(Mg0.5Nb1.5)O (BMN). However, the
7
on different chemical formula models as a function of r
of the (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN cubic pyrochlores (x 6 0.4).
A
/r
B
values
decreasing trend of dielectric constant (e ) in the specimens with
r
x P 0.6 is unexpected from the ion polarizabilities consideration.
Allowing for the phase structure evolution of the (1ꢀx) BMN–x
b_BZN ceramics, it can be inferred that the orthorhombic distortion
reduces the overall ionic polarizability.
The apparent densities shows increasing trend in its values as a
function of x, as shown in Fig. 6. It is well known that higher
density would lead to higher dielectric constant owing to lower
A B
With the r /r values increasing, the tolerance factor (t) shows a
decreasing trend, from 0.8882 to 0.8069. It is well known that the
tolerance factor (t) is 1.0 for the ideal structure, and the closer
tolerance factor (t) is to unity, the greater the stability of the
structure. The decrease of the tolerance factor (t) indicates that
the stability of the phase structure became weak. Furthermore,
the decrease of the phase stability indicates the distortion of the
crystal structure, which is due to the distribution and variety of
divalent cations in the A-and B-site. The lattice energies (U) versus
the b_BZN content are also presented in Fig. 5. The lattice energy
decreases with the b_BZN content increasing, from 66608.12 to
porosity. The variation of dielectric constant (
x 6 0.4, cubic pyrochlores region, is consistent with that of the den-
sity. However, the variation of dielectric constant ( ) of specimens
with x P 0.6, mixture phase region, shows reverse trend with that
of the density. It is suggested that the dielectric constant ( ) of the
r
e ) of specimens with
e
r
e
r
6
6132.35. It is interesting to note that the trend of the tolerance
(1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN ceramics is mainly determined by the intrin-
sic fact, i.e. phase structure, when compare to the extrinsic fact
such as apparent densities.
factor (t) versus the r /r values is consist with that of the lattice
A
B
energies (U), which further verified the decline of the stability of
the phase structure in the (1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN cubic pyrochlores
Fig. 7 presents the variations of dielectric loss and
f
s values of
(x 6 0.4).
(1ꢀx) BMN–x b_BZN ceramics as a function of b_BZN content.
Table 3
0
The proposed chemical formula for structure refinement with different cation distributions in A- and B-sites of the (Bi1.5+0.5x
M0.5ꢀ0.5x)(M0.5+x/6Nb1.5ꢀx/6)O
6
O
1
(M = Mg, Zn)
pyrochlores (x 6 0.4).
BMN–b_BZN
0.8 BMN–0.2b_BZN
0.6 BMN–0.4b_BZN
Model 1a
(Bi1.5Mg0.5) (Mg0.5Nb1.5)O
(Bi1.6Mg0.4) (Mg0.4Zn0.1333Nb1.4667)O
(Bi1.7Mg0.3) (Mg0.3Zn0.2667Nb1.4333)O
7
7
7
b
Model 2
–
–
(Bi1.6Mg0.32Zn0.08) (Mg0.48Zn0.0533Nb1.4667)O
(Bi1.6Mg0.2667Zn0.1333) (Mg0.5333Nb1.4667)O
7
(Bi1.7Mg0.18Zn0.12) (Mg0.42Zn0.1467Nb1.4333)O
(Bi1.7Mg0.0333Zn0.2667) (Mg0.5667Nb1.4333)O
7
Model 3c
7
c
7
c
a
a
b
a
b
r
A
/r
B
1.5
1.5211
1.5242
1.5265
1.5421
1.5467
1.5523
a
b
c
3+
2+
Bi and Mg co-occupy the A-site.
3+
2+
2+
Bi , Mg and Zn co-occupy the A-site at the same time.
2+
Zn only occupy the A-site.