Langmuir
ARTICLE
2.2. General Methods. Analytical NMR spectra were recorded on
Bruker AC spectrometers at 300.13 MHz for 1H and 75.47 MHz for 13C.
GC analyses were carried out on a Chrompack CP 9002 apparatus
equipped with a flame ionization detector and a CP-Sil 5CB column with
a 100% dimethylpolysiloxane internal phase (25 m  0.32 mm id).
Undecane was chosen as the internal standard for GC analysis. High-
resolution mass spectra were obtained at the Centre Universitaire de
Mesures et d’Analyses de l’Universitꢀe de Lille 2 on an Exactive instru-
ment (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Figure 1. Octadienylethers of tri- and tetraethylene glycol (C8:2E3 and
C
8:2E4).
are never formed as well-defined compounds and the commercial
products are mixtures with an average degree of ethoxylation. To
obtain well-defined compounds, an alternative synthetic path is
based on the reaction of a given polyoxyethylene with a halo-
genoalkane under Williamson-type conditions.8 It is, however,
unsatisfactory with respect to limited yields, the use of unwanted
reactants (halogenated compounds, strong bases), the genera-
tion of side products (salts), and the required solvent extraction
procedures to isolate the desired products.
The palladium-catalyzed telomerization of 1,3-dienes with
nucleophiles was first discovered in 1967 by Smutny,9 and since
then, it has received great attention from both the academic and
industrial communities. This reaction pathway is indeed 100%
atom-efficient and can avoid the use of organic solvents. 1,3-
Butadiene has been the most studied diene, and monoalcohols
are usually used as nucleophiles, as, for instance, in the indus-
trially relevant reaction of 1,3-butadiene with methanol, which
gives access to 1-octene after hydrogenation and methanol
elimination. The use of polyfunctional nucleophiles raises issues
of selectivity enhancement to avoid obtaining complex mixtures.
Recent papers describe the butadiene telomerization with various
polyols including ethylene glycol,10,11 1,2-propanediol, 1,3-
propanediol, 1,2-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol,12 glycerol,13 isosorbide14
or even more complex sugars or polyols as pentoses,15 sorbitol, or
sucrose.16 The use of biphasic reaction systems increases the
selectivity and allows catalyst recycling.11
As well as being efficient, this synthetic pathway is also an
expeditious way to obtain unconventional amphiphiles that
possess a 2,7-octadienyl chain (C8:2) with an inner double bond
having a trans configuration (Figure 1). Subsequent hydrogena-
tion gives way to the usual saturated homologues (C8E3 and
C8E4). The effect of the presence of double bonds in the alkyl
chain of amphiphiles, particularly the short ones, is not widely
discussed in the literature.17 In this work, we have been interested
in evaluating the effect of the presence of these double bonds on
the behavior of tri- and tetraethylene glycol ethers obtained by
butadiene telomerization with the corresponding poly(ethylene
glycol). The self-association of C8:2E3 and C8:2E4 in water and
oil/water has been evaluated in comparison with that of well-
known C8E3 and C8E4. For C8E4 and C8:2E4, some DLS
(dynamic light scattering) measurements have been performed
in the microemulsion of Winsor I systems. The conductor-like
screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) has also been
used to model the compounds.
2.3. Synthesis. The typical procedures are described below for
C8:2E3 and its saturated homologue C8E3. C8:2E4 and C8E4 are obtained
through the same procedure.
2.3.1. Telomerization. Catalyst [Pd(OAc)2] (11.2 mg, 0.05 mmol),
phosphine ligand TPPTS (114 mg, 0.2 mmol), triethylene glycol
(11.1 mL, 83 mmol), and a soda degassed aqueous solution (1 M,
0.8 mL) were introduced into a 100 mL stainless steel autoclave that was
bolted and flushed with nitrogen. The base was dissolved in distilled
water, degassed under nitrogen flow, and then transferred to the
autoclave. The latter was cooled to À20 °C. A precise volume of
butadiene (19 mL, 207 mmol) was condensed in a Schlenk tube with
an acetoneÀdry ice mixture and transferred into the autoclave. Finally,
the reactor was heated to 80 °C and vigorously stirred (at a rate of about
1000 rpm) with a magnetic stirrer for 3 h. After the reaction, the system
was cooled and excess gaseous butadiene was vented. The crude product
was homogenized by methanol addition, and 250 μL of undecane was
added. The conversion and selectivities were calculated from the GC
analysis of the homogeneous mixture: 60% glycol conversion is achieved
with a selectivity of up to 80% mono-C8:2E3 (linear + branched < 5%),
7% dialkylated dienols, and 13% octadienols.
2.3.2. Separation of the Telomers. Twenty milliliters of water were
added, and the telomers were extracted with ethyl acetate (3 Â 40 mL).
The organic phase was dried by using Na2SO4 and evaporated to
dryness. Telomers were purified by several distillations under reduced
pressure (0.1 mbar). Eb ≈ 130 °C for C8:2E3 and 145 °C for C8:2E4.
2.3.3. Hydrogenation. To get the saturated homologues (C8E3 and
C8E4), hydrogenation was performed in an autoclave at 20 bars of
hydrogen and at room temperature for 24 h in the presence of Pd/C.
Total conversion was obtained, and filtration of the catalyst over Celite
afforded the pure product.
The final products have 97À98% purity (GC and NMR) with 2 or 3%
branched isomers as impurities.
2.4. C8:2E3. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.74 (ddt, 1 H, 3JHÀH
=
17.4 Hz, 3JHÀH = 10.8 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.4 Hz, CH2ÀCHdCH2); 5.64 (dt,
1H, 3JHÀH = 15.4 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.6 Hz, CH2ÀCHdCHÀCH2O); 5.51
(dt, 1H, 3JHÀH = 15.4 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.1 Hz, CHdCHÀCH2O); 4.95 (d,
3
3
1H, JHÀH = 17.4 Hz, CHdCH2); 4.90 (d, 1H, JHÀH = 10.8 Hz,
CHdCH2); 3.92 (d, 2H, 3JHÀH = 6.7 Hz, CHÀCH2O); 3.50 À 3.71 (m,
12H, triethylene glycol moiety): 2.92 (t, 1H, 3JHÀH = 5.9 Hz, OH); 2.01
(dd, 4H, 3JHÀH = 7.2 Hz, CHÀCH2ÀCH2ÀCH2ÀCH); 1.43 (tt, 2H,
3JHÀH = 7.5 Hz, CH2ÀCH2 ÀCH2). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ
138.5 (1C, CHdCH2); 134.4 (1C, CHdCHÀCH2O); 126.4 (1C,
CHdCHÀCH2O); 114.5 (1C, CHdCH2); triethylene glycol moiety:
72.5 (1C), 71.9 (1C), 70.6 (2C), 70.3 (1C), 68.9 (1C); 61.5 (1C,
CHdCHÀCH2O); 33.1 (1C, CH2ÀCHdCHÀCH2O); 31.6 (1C,
CH2ÀCHdCH2); 28.2 (1C, CH2ÀCH2ÀCH2).
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
HRMS m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C14H26O4H, 259.1904; found,
259.1905.
2.1. Chemicals. Triethylene glycol (99%) and tetraethylene glycol
(99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and palladium acetate
(98%) was purchased from Strem. n-Octane and cyclohexane used for
the construction of “fish” diagrams were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich or
Fluka in the highest available grades. All chemicals were used as received.
For a comparison of DLS in the microemulsion phase, a sample of
tetraethylene glycol decyl ether (C10E4) was synthesized and purified
following known procedures.8,18
2.5. C8:2E4. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.72 (ddt, 1 H, 3JHÀH
=
17.0 Hz, 3JHÀH = 10.4 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.6 Hz, CH2ÀCHdCH2); 5.61 (dt,
1H, 3JHÀH = 15.6 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.6 Hz, CH2ÀCHdCHÀCH2O); 5.48
(dt, 1H, 3JHÀH = 15.6 Hz, 3JHÀH = 6.2 Hz, CHdCHÀCH2O); 4.92 (d,
3
3
1H, JHÀH = 17.0 Hz, CHdCH2); 4.87 (d, 1H, JHÀH = 10.4 Hz,
CHdCH2); 3.88 (d, 2H, 3JHÀH = 6.2 Hz, CHÀCH2O); 3.47À3.68 (m,
16H, tetraethylene glycol moiety); 2.81 (m, 1H, OH); 1.98 (dd, 4H,
243
dx.doi.org/10.1021/la203644k |Langmuir 2012, 28, 242–250