1
48
F. Yang et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 651 (2002) 146–148
iodophenol, respectively (runs 13 and 14, Table 2).
Longer reaction time and higher reaction temperature
turned out to be little improvement (runs 15 and 16,
Table 2). Moreover, the reaction of bromobenzene was
carries out under the same conditions (runs 17–20 in
Table 2), and the results indicate that only traces of
products were yielded.
mirror formation and the application of these com-
plexes for other substrates are currently in progress.
1. Experimental
All GC results were recorded on a SRI8610C
chromatograph.
The issue of a possible Pd(II)/Pd(IV) cycle in Heck
catalysis is currently under debate, particularly for cy-
clopalladated complexes [9]. In our cases, we think the
major pathway of the reactions is via a Pd(0)/Pd(II)
cycle, since similar catalytic activity was observed for
different catalysts (runs 5 and 7, runs 6 and 8, Table 2).
Moreover, when 0.1 mmol% of complex 4 was used in
the coupling reaction of iodobenzene with methylacry-
late at the same conditions except under a lower tem-
perature (80 °C), a beautiful palladium mirror was
observed on the wall of the flask at the end of reaction.
The observed palladium mirror assured the formation
of Pd(0) species during the reaction. As far as we know,
there is no report on palladium mirror formation in
Heck reactions catalyzed by cyclopalladated complexes.
The possible Pd(II)/Pd(IV) cycle cannot be ruled out in
our cases either; it may function as a side pathway.
However, what interests us now is the remarkable
difference in the catalytic activity shown by the
monomeric complexes and the dimeric ones. We sup-
pose that the catalytic difference resulted from the
triphenylphosphine part, which is the main difference in
their structures. In many Heck reactions, tertiary phos-
phine, usually triphenylphosphine, is required to fur-
nish the reaction [5]. It is also widely accepted that
1
.1. General procedure
In a 25 ml flask were placed 5 mmol of ArI, 6 mmol
of methylacrylate, 7 mmol of NEt , 0.1 mol% catalyst
3
and 10 ml of solvent. The reaction mixture was stirred
at 140 °C for a period of time, and determined by GC
based on iodobenzene. The product was identified by
comparison with authentic sample.
Acknowledgements
Project supported by the Foundation of Science and
Technology Development of Shanghai, China.
References
[
1] (a) R.F. Heck, Palladium Reagents in Organic Syntheses, Aca-
demic Press, New York, 1985;
(b) W. Cabri, I. Candiani, Acc. Chem. Res. 28 (1995) 2;
(
c) T. Jeffery, Adv. Met.-Org. Chem. 5 (1996) 153.
2] (a) B.L. Shaw, S.D. Perera, E.A. Staley, Chem. Commun. (1998)
361;
[
1
(
b) W.A. Herrmann, C. Brossmer, C.-P. Reisinger, T.H. Rier-
Pd(OAc) employed in the catalytic systems, generally
8
2
meier, K. Ofele, M. Beller, Chem. Eur. J. 3 (1997) 1357;
(c) M. Ohff, A. Ohff, M.E. van der Boom, D. Milstein, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 11687.
in combination with tertiary phosphine ligands, is re-
duced to the catalytically active palladium(0) species in
the presence of base, such as, triethyl amine [8]. We
assumed that the monomeric complexes 2 and 4 are
easier to be reduced to the active Pd(0) species com-
pared with the corresponding dimeric ones under the
same conditions. The in situ generated Pd(0) species
probably were the actually active catalysts, thus re-
sulted in the different catalytic activity observed in our
investigation.
In summary, we have found that cyclopalladated
complexes of tertiary arylamines 1–4 are active cata-
lysts for Heck reactions of iodoarenes with methylacry-
late in contrast with traditional palladium catalysts.
Meanwhile, the monomeric complexes (2 and 4) were
found to be more efficient than the corresponding
dimeric ones (1 and 3). The palladium mirror observed
at the end of the reaction is a support for the classic
Pd(0)/Pd(II) cycle. Further studies on the palladium
[
[
3] F. Miyazaki, K. Yamaguchi, M. Shibasaki, Tetrahedron Lett. 40
(
1999) 7379.
4] M. Ohff, A. Ohff, D. Milstein, Chem. Commun. (1999) 357.
[5] W.A. Herrmann, M. Elison, J. Fisher, C. K o¨ cher, G.R.J. Artus,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34 (1995) 2371.
[
[
6] M.T. Reetz, E. Westermann, R. Lohmer, G. Lohmer, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 39 (1998) 8449.
7] (a) A.C. Cope, E.C. Friedrich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 909;
(
b) J.C. Gaunt, B.L. Shaw, J. Organomet. Chem. 102 (1975) 511;
(c) B. Crociani, T. Boschi, R. Pietropaolo, U. Belluco, J. Chem.
Soc. (A) (1970) 531.
[
8] (a) F. Ozawa, A. Kubo, T. Hayashi, Chem. Lett. (1992) 2177;
(
2
b) S. Hiller, S. Sartori, O. Reiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996)
077;
(c) C. Amatore, A. Jutand, M.A. M’Barki, Organometallics 11
(1992) 3009.
[
9] (a) B.L. Shaw, S.D. Perera, Chem. Commun. (1998) 1863;
(
(
(
b) M. Beller, T.H. Riermeier, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1 (1998) 29;
c) B.L. Shaw, New J. Chem. 22 (1998) 77;
d) W.A. Herrmann, V.P.W. B o¨ hm, C.-P. Reisinger, J.
Organomet. Chem. 576 (1999) 23.