C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
M-1). Tetraethylphosphonium and ammonium bromides 7(b-c)+-
Br-, as well as adamantane and 1-hydroxyadamantane did not
interact with cavitands 4 under the same conditions.
The octaamide 5 also forms a kinetically stable 1:1 complex with
7a+Br- either in dry or water-saturated CDCl3. The induced upfield
shifts for the 1H and 31P signals were considerably smaller (∆δ )
-3.4 and -5.8 ppm, respectively) than those for the complex with
4. An analogous trend was found also for the complexes with
triethylammonium chloride. Apparently the four imidazole rings
in 4 contribute to the shielding effect of the cavity. The addition
of 5% of methanol resulted in a complete destruction of the
inclusion complexes of cavitands 4. Whether this is due to better
solvation of the guest, host or both is not yet known.
In summary, readily available tetrabenzimidazole cavitands 4 are
new open-ended hosts with deep cavities. The crucial role of water
in the hydrogen bonding with 4 is, to the best of our knowledge,
the first example of such solvent effects on simple cavitands.6,13
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the Skaggs Foundation
and the National Institute of Health for financial support. A.R.F.
and A. S. are Skaggs postdoctoral fellows.
Figure 2. The 1H NMR spectra in water-saturated CDCl3 (600 MHz, 295
K): (a) 4b; (b) 3 4b + 7a+ Br- water saturated CDCl3. (b) water; (*)
methine protons of the bridges; (1) methyl protons of benzimidazole
fragments.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures and
analytical data for compounds 4 (PDF). This material is available free
symmetrical vase conformation of cavitands. A signal for water
involved in hydrogen bonds to 4 was broad and centered at 2.70
ppm; free water molecules gave a broad signal at 1.6 ppm. The
pattern for the cavitand protons did not significantly change with
temperature between 233 and 323 K. The vase conformation is rigid.
The pattern of hydrogen bonds presented by the imidazoles is
self-complementary and raised the possibility that the compounds
exist as dimeric capsules, but the following experiments exclude
such structures. The 1H NMR spectra of 1:1 mixtures of 4a + 4b,
4a + 4c, and 4b + 4c in water-saturated CDCl3 were the
superimpositions of the spectra of the individual components and
showed no sign of kinetically stable heterodimers. Moreover,
cavitands 4 and monomeric self-folding cavitands 5 showed nearly
the same kinetics of NOEs (1D GOESY) upon irradiation of the
methine protons of the bridges, which reveals the comparable size
of both molecules. This is in contrast to the same experiments with
the tetraimide 6.10 This compound exists as a dimer and forms a
cylindrical capsule approximately twice as large as the monomers
4 and 5.11 The capsule’s negative NOEs are about 10 times stronger
than those of the monomers 4 and 5. The solubility and the NMR
spectra of 5 in CDCl3 show no dependence on the amount of water
present in the solution.
Structure B has nearly the same size of cavity as 5 (structure C,
Figure 2), and therefore similar inclusion properties were expected.
The addition of tetramethylphosphonium bromide 7a+Br- to the
solution of 4b in water-saturated CDCl3 resulted in a new set of
cavitand signals which grew at the expense of the original set upon
further addition of the salt (Figure 2b). A sharp doublet emerged
at -2.32 ppm, corresponding to the methyl protons of the
complexed cation. The large upfield shift for this resonance (∆δ
) -4.4 ppm) is consistent with the position of the cation 7a+ deep
in the cavity of the host. The broad signal for water was found at
3.0 ppm in the caviplex.12 Upon complexation, the 31P resonance
of 7a+ undergoes an upfield shift of 8.0 ppm. The complex has a
1:1 stoichiometry and is kinetically stable on the NMR time scale
at 295 K. The low solubility of 7a+Br- in CDCl3 and its strong
complexation in the cavitand hampered the reliable evaluation of
the stability constant.
References
(1) Reviews: (a) Cram, D. J.; Cram, J. M. In Container Molecules and Their
Guests; Stoddart, F., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, 1994.
(b) Timmerman, P.; W. Verboom, Reinhoudt, D. N. Tetrahedron 1996,
52, 2663. (c) Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek, J., Jr., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
1991-2005. (d) Calixarenes 2001; Asfari, Z., Bo¨hmer, V., Harrowfield,
J., Vicens, J., Saadioui, M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht,
Boston, London, 2001.
(2) (a) Cram, D. J.; Karbach, S.; Kim, H.-E.; Knobler, C. B.; Maverick, E.
F.; Ericson, J. L.; Helgeson, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2229-
2237. (b) Moran, J. R.; Ericson, J. L.; Dalcanale, E.; Bryant, J. A.; Knobler,
C. B.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5707-5714.
(3) For a very recent example of kinetically stable caviplexes see: Corinne
L. D. Gibb, C. L. D.; Stevens, E. D.; Gibb, B. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5849-5850.
(4) Cram, D. J.; Choi, H. -J.; Bryant, J. A.; Knobler, C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 7748-7765.
(5) (a) Rudkevich, D. M.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 12216-12225. (b) Haino, T.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Shivanyuk,
A.; Rissanen, K.; Rebek, J., Jr. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3797-3805. (c)
Saito, S.; Nuckolls, C.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9628-
9630.
(6) For examples of solvent-sealed hydrogen-bonded molecular capsules,
see: (a) MacGillivray, L. R.; Atwood, J. L. Nature 1999, 389, 469-472.
(b) Murayama, K.; Aoki, K. Chem. Commun. 1998, 607-608. (c) Rose,
K. N.; Barbour, L. J.; Orr, G. W. Atwood, J. L. Chem. Commun. 1998,
407-408. (d) Shivanyuk, A.; Rissanen, K.; Kolehmainen, E. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 1107-1108. (e) Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 7662-7665. (f) Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 2374-2375. (g) Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 2424-2425.
(7) (a) Chi, Y.-C.; Sun, C.-M. Synlett 2000, 591-594. (b) Fujita, M.; Egawa,
H.; Miyamoto, T.; Nakano, J.; Matsumoto, J.-I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996,
44, 987-990. (c) Fujita, M.; Egawa, H.; Kataoka, M.; Miyamoto, T.;
Nakano, J.; Matsumoto, J.-I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 2123-2132.
(8) Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.;
Caufield, C.; Hendickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11,
440-467.
(9) MeOH, EtOH, n-BuOH, t-BuOH and BnOH were studied.
(10) (a) Heinz, T.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek, J., Jr. Nature 1998, 394, 764-
766. (b) Heinz, T.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 1136-1139.
(11) Neuhaus, D.; Williamson, M. The Nuclear OVerhauser Effect In Structural
and Conformational Analysis; VCH Publishers Inc.: New York, 1989; p
328.
(12) The 1H NMR spectrum of 7a+Br- in water-saturated CDCl3 contained a
broad signal at 1.7 ppm corresponding to the protons of water molecules.
(13) Electrostatic interactions between anions and cations were used for the
extension and rigidification of the resorcinarene’s cavity: Shivanyuk, A.;
Spaniol, T. P.; Rissanen, K.; Kolehmainen, E.; Bo¨hmer, V. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3497-3500.
A kinetically stable 1:1 complex between cavitands 4 and
triethylammonium chloride 7d+Br- was observed in water-saturated
CDCl3 at 295 K, although the binding was rather weak (Kass < 10
JA012453P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 12, 2002 2855