Cavitand 2 was directly prepared as reported by de
Mendoza,24 and the intermediates, i.e., the corresponding
octanitro cavitand and octaamino cavitand reported by
Rebek23,25-27 were similarly prepared by the method reported
by Cram et al.28
At room temperature, cavitand 2 was barely soluble in
CH2Cl2, CHCl3, toluene, or mesitylene but reasonably soluble
in DMF or DMSO, as reported by de Mendoza.24 However,
at elevated temperature it became soluble in these nonpolar
solvents and then stayed in homogeneous solution at room
temperature.
The encapsulation studies of cavitand 2 and 4-methyl-N-
p-tolylbenzamide 4 were performed in mesitylene as devised
by Rebek.12,13 A mixture of cavitand 2 and guest 4 in
mesitylene remained as a heterogeneous mixture at room
temperature even after 5 days, but at above 100 °C the
mixture was slowly homogenized. The encapsulation com-
plex 4@2‚2 was prepared by heating the mixture under reflux
until it became homogeneous and then removing the solvent
by vacuum distillation at 70 °C. The solid residue was dried
at 100 °C under vacuum. The solid complex 4@2‚2 is then
soluble in CDCl3, DMSO-d6, or toluene-d8 at room temper-
ature.
An equimolar mixture of cavitand 2 and guest 4 (1.67 mM:
1.67 mM) in mesitylene gave a soluble complex in a
relatively short period (30 min at 170 °C), but incomplete
encapsulation was observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy, which
showed three different chemical shifts of the N-H of urea
moieties for cavitand 2 (10.35, 10.36, and 10.40 ppm). The
chemical shift of the N-H of cavitand 2 was a good indicator
of whether the encapsulation complex 4@2‚2 was formed
completely or partially: the chemical shift of 2‚2 in toluene-
d8 was observed at 10.35 ppm.
A complete encapsulated complex 4@2‚2 was prepared
from a mixture of cavitand 2 and guest 4 (1.67 mM:6 mM,
respectively) in mesitylene by heating under reflux for 30
min. The 1H NMR spectrum of 4@2‚2 in toluene-d8 at 100
°C showed the chemical shifts for guest 4 at 5.41 (d, Hc),
5.20 (d, He), 3.29 (d, Hb), 3.14 (d, Hf), -2.33 (s, Hg), and
-2.41 (s, Ha) ppm (Figure 2 and Table 1). Like the
isomorphous cavitand 1‚1,11 the large upfield chemical shifts
of encapsulated guest 4 in capsule 2‚2 are observed up to
4.50 ppm for the methyl group (Ha, 2.09 ppm) of free 4 in
the 1H NMR spectrum as a result of the shielding by aromatic
ring current of capsule 2‚2. Compared to the chemical shifts
(∆δ1) for 4 in 1‚1, those (∆δ2) in 2‚2 are slightly smaller
(∆∆δ ) 0.40, 0.37 for Ha and Hg, respectively), which is
consistent with the molecular dimensions (17.21 vs 17.43 Å
through the long C4 axis of 1‚1 and 2‚2, respectively)
calculated using semiempirical AM1.
Figure 1. Hydrogen bonding modes of self-assembled pyrazin-
imide capsule 1‚1 and phenyleneurea capsule 2‚2. The bond lengths
were calculated from the energy-minimized structures (Spartan 04,
V1.0.1, AM1 semiempirical).
nonpolar mesitylene-d12. The inclusion complexes G@1‚1
show interesting guest-exchange phenomena and unprec-
edented isomerism.11-23
Phenyleneurea cavitands 2, 3, and other analogues were
first reported by de Mendoza et al.24 These cavitands
aggregated, forming different self-organized structures such
as vesicles or filaments, depending on the nature and length
of the four alkyl feet. Cavitand 2 formed large reverse
vesicles through side to side extensive stacking. In contrast,
cavitand 3 formed dimeric capsules with carboxylic acids.
We report the observation of the unusually stable capsule
formation of cavitand 2. At elevated temperature guest
molecules could template cavitand 2 to form a dimeric
capsule 2‚2 by reorganizing the intermolecular hydrogen
bonds of the aggregate of cavitand 2.
(13) Ko¨rner, S. K.; Tucci, F. C.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Heinz, T.; Rebek,
J., Jr. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 187.
(14) Craig, S. L.; Lin, S.; Chen, J.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 8780.
(15) Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 684.
(16) Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12074.
(17) Scarso, A.; Shivanyuk, A.; Hayashida, O.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6239.
(18) Shivanyuk, A.; Scarso, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. Chem. Commun. 2003,
1230.
(19) Shivanyuk, S.; Rebek, J., Jr. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2326.
(20) Hayashida, O.; Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 3423.
(21) Chen, J.; Ko¨rner, S.; Craig, S. L.; Lin, S.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek,
J., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 2593.
(22) Hof, F.; Rebek, J., Jr. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4775.
(23) Far, A. R.; Shivanyuk, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 2854.
The two different chemical shifts of the N-H of urea
moieties for cavitand 2 (10.40 and 10.36 ppm) confirm that
(25) Rudkevich, D. M.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9911.
(26) Rudkevich, D. M.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 12216.
(27) Tucci, F. C.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 4555.
(24) Ebbing, M. H. K.; Villa, M.-J.; Valpuesta, J.-M.; Prados, P.; de
Mendoza, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4962.
(28) Cram, D. J.; Choi, H.-J.; Bryant, J. A.; Knobler, C. B.J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 7748.
4432
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004