886
P.P. Salvi et al. / C. R. Chimie 14 (2011) 883–886
confirmed that the IL is structurally stable even after fifth
run.
[BMIM][BF4]: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 0.72 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
3H), 1.11 (m, 2H), 1.67 (m, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 4.17 (s, 2H),
7.85 (s, 1H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 9.63 (s, 1H).
3. Conclusion
[(CH2)4SO3HMIM][HSO4]: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 1.49 –
1.59 (m, 2H), 1.82 – 1.92 (m, 2H), 2.51 – 2.58 (m, 2H), 3.85
(s, 3H), 4.18 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (s, 2H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.78
(s, 1H), 9.16 (s, 1H).
Several BAILs with different acidic scales were synthe-
sized. Their acidity was infuenced by the structures of both
the anion and the cation. In particular, the presence of a
SO3H group in the anions of BAILs might be responsible for
[CMIM][HSO4] (before any run): 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
3.63 (s, 3H), 4.84 (t, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (s, 2H), 8.49 (bs,
a
higher acidity, which brought about
a
signicant
1H).
promoting effect on the formation of 1,8-dioxo-octahy-
droxanthene. The product yield attained a plateau when
the reaction was promoted with BAILs. Further study of
[CMIM][HSO4] with similar reaction shows discrimination
in the good to excellent yield. The reusability of ILs has
given the green touch to the research.
[CMIM][HSO4] (after fifth run): 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
3.82 (s, 3H), 5.11 (t, J = 2.9, 2H), 7.76 (s, 2H), 9.0 (bs, 1H).
[BMIM][HSO4]: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
d
3H), 1.25 – 1.18 (m, 2H), 1.73 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 4.15 (s,
2H), 7.41 (bs, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 9.31 (s, 1H).
[BMIM][H2PO4]: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 0.87 (t, J = 7.2,
3H), 1.22 (m, 2H), 1.74 (s, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 4.16 (s, 2H), 7.71
(s, 1H), 7.78 (s, 1H), 9.28 (s, 1H), (H of H2PO4 not seen).
4. Experimental
[NMP][HSO4]: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 1.83 – 1.91 (m,
4.1. Materials and methods
2H), 2.15 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (s, 3H), 3.27 (t, J = 6.9 Hz,
2H), 9.78 (bs, NH, HSO4).
All the chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich
and used as received without further purication. The IR
spectra was run on a Perkin–Elmer, FTIR-1600 spectro-
photometer and expressed in cmÀ1 (KBr). 1H and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance (300 MHz)
spectrometer. An LC-MS spectrum was obtained with
Shimadzu LC-MS–2010 equipped with electrospray ioni-
zation interface.
Acknowledgments
The authors P.P.S. and S.S.K., thanks to DAE–BRNS, New
Delhi (India) for the research fellowship and financial
assistance respectively.
References
4.2. Synthesis of ionic liquids
[1] J.F. Huang, G.A. Baker, H. Luo, K. Hong, Q.F. Li, N.J. Bjerrum, S. Dai, Green
Chem 8 (2006) 599.
[2] E.D. Bates, R.D. Mayton, I. Ntai, J.H. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc 124 (2002)
926.
[3] A.E. Visser, R.P. Swatloski, W.M. Reichert, R. Mayton, S. Sheff, A. Wierz-
bicki, J.H. Davis, R.D. Rogers, Chem. Commun. 1 (2001) 135.
[4] S. Lee, Chem. Comm. 10 (2006) 1049.
All the six ionic liquids such as [BMIM][BF4],
[BMIM][HSO4], [BMIM][H2PO4], [CMIM][HSO4], [NMP]
[HSO4] and [(CH2)4SO3HMIM][HSO4] were synthesized
according to reported methods [20–23].
[5] M. Picquet, I. Tkatchenko, I. Tommasi, P. Wasserscheid, J. Zimmermann,
Synth. Catal 345 (2003) 959.
4.3. General procedure
[6] P.P. Salvi, A.M. Mandhare, A.S. Sartape, D.K. Pawar, S.H. Han, S.S.
[7] S. Hatakeyma, N. Ochi, H. Numata, S. Takano, Chem. Commun. 17
(1988) 1202.
[8] G. Song, B. Wang, H. Luo, L. Yang, Catal. Commun 8 (2007) 673.
[9] H.R. Shaterian, A. Hosseinian, M. Ghashang, Phosphorus, Sulfur and
Silicon 183 (2008) 3136.
[10] J.J. Li, X.Y. Tao, Z.H. Zhang, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon 183 (2008)
1672.
[11] H.R. Shaterian, A. Hosseinian, M. Ghashang, Turk J. Chem 33 (2009) 233.
[12] D. Kumar, J.S. Sandhu, Synth. Commun 1 (40) (2010) 510.
[13] H.R. Shaterian, R. Doostmohammadi, F. Khorami, M. Ghashang, Phos-
phorus, Sulfur and Silicon 185 (2010) 171.
[14] D.M. Pore, T.S. Shaikh, N.G. Patil, S.B. Dongare, U.V. Desai, Synth.
Commun 1 (40) (2010) 2215.
[15] F. He, P. Li, Y. Gu, G. Li, Green Chem 11 (2009) 1767.
[16] B. Das, P. Thirupathia, K.R. Reddya, B. Ravikantha, L. Nagarapu, Catal.
Commun 8 (2007) 535.
[17] H.N. Karade, M. Sathe, M.P. Kaushik, Arkivoc xiii (2007) 252.
[18] D. Fang, K. Gong, Z.-L. Liu, Catal. Lett. 127 (2009) 291.
[19] D. Fang, J.-M. Yang, Z.-L. Liu, J. Heterocyclic Chem. 48 (2011) 468,
[20] R. Zheng, X. Wang, H. Xu, J. Du, Synth. Commun 36 (2006) 1503.
[21] W. Wang, L. Shao, W. Cheng, J. Yang, M. He, Catal. Commun 9 (2008)
337.
The round-bottomed flask was charged with benzalde-
hyde (5 mmol), dimedone (10 mmol) and [CMIM][HSO4]
(10 mol %). Unfortunately, as the [CMIM][HSO4] is very
viscous, water (10 mL) was used as sequester. The mixture
was then stirred at 70 8C for an appropriate time (Table 1).
On completion of reaction (monitored by TLC), the
precipitated crude product was collected by filtration to
get a product in excellent yield (95%). The product was
identified by IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and LC-MS with those
reported in the literature.
3,3,6,6-Tetramethyl-9-phenyl-3,4,5,6,7,9-hexahydro-
2H-xanthene-1,8-dione (3):
mp 202-204 8C; IR (KBr): 2960 cmÀ1 (-CH3 stretching),
2874 cmÀ1 (Ar C – H stretching), 1665 cmÀ1
(a, b –
unsaturated carbonyl group), 1622 and 1453 cmÀ1 (Ar C –
C stretching); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
0.9 (s, 6H), 1.1
(s, 6H), 2.2 (s, 4H), 2.4 (s, 4H), 4.7 (s, 1H), 7.1 – 7.3 (m, 5H);
13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
27.3, 29.2, 31.8, 32.1, 40.8,
d
d
50.7, 115.6, 126.3, 128.0, 128.3, 144.0, 162.2, 196.2; M/
z = 351 (M + 1); Purity by LC-MS = 100%.
[22] H. Tajika, K. Niknam, F. Parsa, J. Iran Chem. Soc. 6 (2009) 159.
[23] Y. Gu, F. Shi, Y. Deng, J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem 212 (2004) 71.