10.1002/anie.201711739
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
The UV-visible absorption spectrum of FHBC is compared
with well-known tBuHBC6,17 in CH2Cl2 in Figure 3A. Each shows
characteristic well-resolved vibronic structure; however, the
significant expansion of the graphitic core in FHBC, leads to a
large red shift (by ~90 nm) of its absorption bands (325, 451,
and 486 nm; ɛ451 = 6.0 x 105 M-1cm-1) and increased molar
The cation radical of FHBC was generated in solution via
quantitative redox titrations using magic blue (i.e., MB+• or tris-4-
bromophenylamminium cation radical, Ered = 0.70 V vs Fc/Fc+,
λmax = 728 nm, εmax = 28,200 cm-1 M-1) as an oxidant (Figure
4B).18,19 The spectrum of FHBC+• remained unchanged at
tenfold higher concentration, as well as in the presence of
excess (up to 10 equivalents) neutral FHBC, suggesting a lack
of aggregation either between the molecules of FHBC+• or
FHBC+•/FHBC in solution. In contrast, tBuHBC+• readily forms a
absorptivity compared to tBuHBC (230, 360, and 390 nm; ε360
=
1.9 x 105 M-1cm-1). Normalized emission spectra of FHBC and
tBuHBC, at the same concentrations, Figure 3B, show a red-shift
of the emission bands of FHBC (582, 612 nm) compared to
tBuHBC (486, 520 nm). At higher concentrations, tBuHBC shows
a broad excimeric emission (at ~560 nm) indicating aggregate
(i.e., dimer, and higher oligomers) formation.17 In contrast, the
emission spectrum of FHBC does not show the appearance of a
new excimeric band (Figure S9 in the Supporting Information).
dimeric cation radical in solution, i.e. tBuHBC+•
+
tBuHBC à
+•
[
tBuHBC]2 with an equilibrium constant K = 1100 M-1 (see Figure
S8 in Supporting Information). Expansion of the chromophoric
size of FHBC+• (λmax = 460, 528, 664, 1261, and 1418 nm, ε1418
=
36,000 cm-1 M-1) leads to an increased molar absorptivity (by a
factor of ~6) when compared to tBuHBC+• (λmax = 550, 836, 1570,
1740, 2100 nm, ε2100 = 5700 cm-1 M-1), see Figure S7 in the
Supporting Information.6,17
451
486
582
Summarizing, while tBuHBC forms aggregates in neutral,
excited, and cation radical states, as judged by, respectively,
broad NMR spectra, observation of excimeric emission (at ~560
nm),6,17 and observation of intervalence transition (at 1200
nm)6,17 in its cation radical spectrum in the presence of neutral
tBuHBC (see Figures S8/S9 in the Supporting Information), such
spectroscopic signatures of aggregation were completely absent
in the case of FHBC. A cursory examination of the molecular
structures of FHBC and tBuHBC suggests that the narrow bay
areas in FHBC do not afford arrangement of two hexyl chains in
a staggered (sandwich-like) dimer. On the other hand, the
relatively wider bay areas in tBuHBC provide sufficient space for
smaller methyl groups to be accommodated in a sandwich-like
(staggered) dimeric structure (Figure 5A).
As a further probe of the lack of aggregation in FHBC, we
performed (1-ns long) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at
ambient temperature, which showed that neutral tBuHBC indeed
forms a stable dimer (with the interplanar separations between
the aromatic cores close to van der Waals contact (~3.5 Å),
while in dimeric FHBC the pair of nanographenes lie at a
separation of ~7.8 Å (Figure 5B-C). Indeed, the presence of the
long hexyl chains in FHBC hinders the approach of the graphitic
cores in the dimer in favor of multiple CH-π interactions between
the large π-system and alkyl chains (Figure 5B/C). It is important
to emphasize that access to FHBC platform, which resist self
aggregation, will open new avenues for the preparation of 2-
dimensional extended aggregates via π-π contacts between
the outer phenylenes of fluorene moieties that can be
functionalized with appropriate groups at its vertices.
FHBC
FHBC
tBuHBC
tBuHBC
486
325
612
230
360
390
520
200
400
Wavelength, nm
600 400
550
Wavelength, nm
700
Figure 3. Comparison of the UV-vis absorption (10-6 M) and emission spectra
of FHBC (red) and tBuHBC (blue) in CH2Cl2 at 22 °C.
Electrochemical analysis showed that FHBC displays four
reversible oxidation waves at 0.40, 0.76, 1.01 and 1.19 V (vs.
Fc/Fc+) corresponding to the formation of monocation, dication,
trication and tetracation, respectively (Figure 4A). In contrast,
tBuHBC exhibits a single oxidation wave at 0.64 V vs Fc/Fc+ in
CH2Cl2 (see Figure S4 in the Supporting Information).6,17
Moreover, the expansion of the size of the graphitic core in
FHBC results in a significant lowering of the first oxidation
potential (by ~240 mV) in comparison to tBuHBC.
A
B
.
FHBC+
.
MB+
1.4
0.7
0.0
500
1000
1500
2000
V vs Fc/Fc+
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 4. (A) Cyclic (solid red line) and square-wave (dashed blue line)
voltammograms of FHBC (0.63 mM) in CH2Cl2 containing 0.2 M n-Bu4NPF6 at
a scan rate of 200 mV s-1 and 22 oC. (B) The spectral changes observed upon
-
the reduction of 5.5 x 10-6 M MB+•SbCl6 by an incremental addition of sub-
stoichiometric amounts of FHBC in CH2Cl2 at 22 oC.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.