Asao and Aikawa
TABLE 1. AuBr3-Catalyzed [4 + 2] Benzannulation between
o-(Alkynyl)benzaldehydes 1 and Carbonyl Compounds 2a
13% yield (eq 3). Probably, acetaldehyde would be produced
in situ by the retro-aldol condensation between 2h and a small
amount of water, which might exist in the media. Then, the
benzannulation between the resulting acetaldehyde and 1a would
take place to afford 3i. This result clearly shows that 2h can be
used as a masked acetaldehyde in the [4 + 2] benzannulation,
although the chemical yield of 3i was low.
entry
1
1
R
2
R1
R2 ratio (3:4)b
yield (%)c
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
1a Ph
2a Ph
2b CH3
2c C5H11
2d Pr
2e
2f
H
3a:4a
3b:4b
3c:4c
3d:4d
3e:4e
3f:4f
87:13
97:3
99:<1
80:20
82:18
91:9
90
87
81
81
56
45
45
71
d,e
2
H
H
H
3
f
i
4
5
g
-(CH2)4-
H CH3
f
6
7
8
2g BnO
H
H
3g:4g
3h:4h
99:<1
99:<1
d
Not only the benzaldehyde derivatives underwent benzan-
nulation; conjugated enyne aldehydes also underwent benzan-
nulation, leading to polysubstituted benzene derivatives regio-
selectively. For example, the reaction of 1c with phenylacetal-
dehyde 2a gave terphenyl derivative 3j and 4i in 42 and 6%,
respectively. When the reaction was carried out using propanal
1b C4H9 2b CH3
a
The reaction was performed using 1 (1 equiv) and 2 (1.2 equiv) in the
presence of AuBr3 (10 mol %) in 1,4-dioxane at 100 °C within 3 h unless
b
1
c
d
otherwise noted. Determined by H NMR. Combined isolated yield. Five
equivalents of 2b were used. The reaction was carried out at 80 °C. The
reaction was carried out in the presence of 30 mol % of AuBr3. The
reaction was carried out in the presence of 20 mol % of AuBr3.
e
f
g
2
b, 3k was obtained in 70% together with 4j in 12% yield (eq
4
).
with small amounts of decarbonylated products 4 in good to
4
,5
high yields, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The
reaction proceeded well even with the sterically bulky aldehyde,
such as 3-methylbutanal 2d, although an increased amount of
catalyst was needed (entry 4). In addition to aldehydes, ketones
were also usable as a 2π-system in the present reaction. When
1
a was treated with cyclohexanone 2e, the corresponding six-
membered annulated naphthalene 3e was obtained in a moderate
yield (entry 5). Analogously, the reaction of 1a with acetone
The reaction of 1 with acetal compounds 5, instead of
carbonyl compounds 2, also proceeded to give a variety of
aromatic compounds. Treatment of 1a with 1,1-dimethoxyoctane
2
f proceeded to give 3f, which is a regioisomer of 3b (entry 6).
Not only simple alkyl and aryl substituents can be introduced
to the naphthalene skeleton; an alkoxy group can also be
introduced to the naphthalene skeleton. The reaction of 1a with
benzyloxyacetaldehyde 2g gave 3g as a sole product (entry 7).
The benzannulation of 1b, having butyl group at the terminal
position of alkyne, with 2b gave 3h in 71% yield (entry 8). In
5
a in the presence of gold catalyst gave the corresponding
naphthalene derivative 3l in 27% yield. The chemical yield was
improved by addition of water (3 equiv), and 3l was obtained
in 68% yield together with 4k in 5% yield (eq 5). We also
examined the reaction of 1a and 1d with paraldehyde 5b. Even
without external addition of water, the corresponding products
i and 3m were obtained in 61 and 52% yields, respectively
eq 6). Furthermore, the reaction between 1c and 5b proceeded
smoothly to give benzophenone derivative 3n in 51% yield
together with a small amount of 4l (8%) (eq 7). These results
showed that 5b can work as an acetaldehyde source in the
[4 + 2] benzannulation as well as 2h.
1
every case, we did not detect the regioisomers of 3; R was
2
always at the C-3 position and R was always at the C-2
3
(
position.
Interestingly, when the reaction of 1a with crotonaldehyde
2
h was examined, naphthyl phenyl ketone 3i was obtained in
(2) For reviews, see: (a) Kotha, S.; Brahmachary, E.; Lahiri, K. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 4741. (b) Modern Arene Chemistry; Astruc, D., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002. (c) Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. ReV.
2000, 100, 2901. (d) Gevorgyan, V.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Organomet. Chem.
1999, 576, 232. (e) Lautens, M.; Klute, W.; Tam, W. Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 49. (f) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259. (g)
Grotjahn, D. B. In ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Hegedus,
L. S., Abel, E. W., Stone, F. G. A., Wilkinson, G., Eds.; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, 1995; Vol. 12, p 741. (h) Schore, N. E. In Comprehensive Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991;
Vol. 5, p 1129. (i) Schore, N. E. Chem ReV. 1988, 88, 1081.
(
3) Asao, N.; Aikawa, H.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
458.
4) For reviews on the Au-catalyzed reactions, see: (a) Ma, S.; Yu, S.;
7
(
Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 200. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6990. (c) Hoffmann-R o¨ der, A.; Krause, N. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 387. (d) Arcadi, A.; Di Giuseppe, S. Curr. Org.
Chem. 2004, 8, 795. (e) Hashmi, A. S. K. Gold Bull. 2004, 37, 51. (f)
Hashmi, A. S. K. Gold Bull. 2003, 36, 3. (g) Dyker, G. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 4237.
(5) For gold-catalyzed benzannulation, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Frost,
T. M.; Bats, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11553. (b) Hashmi, A. S.
K.; Frost, T. M.; Bats, J. W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3769. (c) Dankwardt, J. W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5809. (d) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Frost, T. M.; Bats,
J. W. Catal. Today 2002, 72, 19.
5250 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 14, 2006