2
60
Z. Wang et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 511 (2012) 257–261
−
1
Fig. 8. FC/ZFC plots at 100 Oe of Ni/Si showing TB was 230 K (a) ꢂ was roughly linear with temperature in agreement with the Curie–Weiss law (b). The M–H hysteresis
loops of Ni/Si taken at 5–400 K (c).
exhibited a rather broad size distribution in the range of 10–50 nm
and the splitting ZFC–FC magnetization curves reached a crossing
point around 300 K, indicating a blocking temperature above room
temperature. Jardim’s group [5] also reported that the fcc nickel
the anisotropy barrier [31]. It was well known that at nanoscale
confinement, where the size was of the order of 5–50 nm, the ther-
mal activation energy overcome the cohesive energy of fluctuating
magnetic domains. Above a certain blocking temperature, the ade-
quate energy for the alignment of particle moments in an applied
magnetic field was supplied [29]. As a result, at T > TB, the hysteretic
behavior was suppressed and the system behaves as a strong para-
magnet or superparamagnetism. The temperature dependence of
coercivity was given by the relation [30]:
nanoparticles embedded in a SiO amorphous matrix had been pre-
2
pared which exhibit superparamagnetism above TB < 40 K. So it was
meaningful to study the magnetic properties of ∼35 nm Ni particles
deposited on the surface of SiNWs.
Each silicon nanowire could be seen as core/shell structure
ꢀ
ꢃ
[
25,30]. The loose and rough shell (mean roughness height 1–5 nm)
ꢁ
ꢂ
k
T
contained a large number of interface states or defects. This rough-
ness might be attributed to randomness of the lateral oxidation and
etching in the corrosive aqueous solution or slow HF etching and
faceting of the lattice during synthesis. These defects located in the
oxide and at the interface of the crystalline core to the surround-
ing oxide were proved to possess paramagnetic properties [16]. By
the electroless plating, it was thought that Ni particles were pref-
erentially deposited on the surface defect regions of SiNWs. The
paramagnetic defects and magnetic particles would interact and
affect the Ni/SiNWs magnetic properties.
The magnetic properties of fcc-Ni nanoparticles decorated
SiNWs were investigated. The temperature dependent of the
magnetization (M–T) and hysteresis loops (M–H) curves were
obtained by the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and the field-cooled (FC)
measurement. It was known that the main features of the super-
paramagnetic systems as follows: (1) the ZFC curves are rounded
at the blocking temperature TB, defined as the temperature of the
maximum, indicating a blocking process of the small particles,
and (2) above TB, a paramagnetic like behavior can be found, i.e.,
Curie–Weiss law is satisfied [5]. From ZFC and FC curves as shown
in Fig. 3, Ni nanoparticles decorated SiNWs composite turns from
ferromagnetic to superparamagnetic and the blocking temperature
HC = HC0 1 −
(1)
TB
where HC0 was zero temperature coercivity, the exponent value k
was 0.5 for an assembly of aligned particles and 0.77 for randomly
oriented particles [31]. Referring to Fig. 6, the red line showed
the fitting result according to Eq. (1) using the blocking temper-
ature as the fitting parameter. In Ni/SiNWs studied, when k was
0
.5, the experimental data fitted very well to the above theoretical
relation. From the fitting curve, the coercivity at T = 0 K (HC0) for
nanoparticles was ∼394.2 Oe while the blocking temperature was
3
83.1 K. The blocking temperature obtained is in agreement with
FC/ZFC measurement (370 K in Fig. 3). So it is also concluded that
Ni nanoparticles in our study were well aligned.
For T ≥ TB, the magnetization of superparamagnetic grains in a
magnetic field H was better described as Langevin function [5]:
ꢁ
ꢂ
ꢁ
ꢂ
ꢁ
ꢂ
M
ꢃH
ꢃH
1
= L
= coth
−
(2)
MS
B
k T
B
k T
ꢃH/kBT
where k is Boltzmann constant and ꢃ is the effective moment.
Normalized magnetization as a function of H/T at temperature
400 K is shown in Fig. 6. The experimental results fitted to
Eq. (2) very well. The best-fit parameter of magnetic moment,
B
−
16
4
(
TB) was estimated to be 370 K. Above TB, the reciprocal of suscepti-
ꢃ = 4.9 × 10
erg/Oe = 5.3 × 10 ꢃ , was obtained, where ꢃ was
B
B
−1
bility, ꢂ , was roughly linear with temperature, in agreement with
the Curie–Weiss law, which provided an evidence for the suggested
superparamagnetic behavior.
Bohr Magneton. Such high value of magnetic moment had been
reported for similar nanosystems that show superparamagnetic
behavior [32]. It was concluded that a large number of paramag-
netic defects on the surface of silicon nanowires could give rise
to such high magnetic moment which in turn could explain the
superparamagnetism in Ni/SiNWs.
The M–H hysteresis loops at 5–400 K were measure. And the
5
–400 K loops are shown in Fig. 4. For the loop at 5 K, the values
of saturation magnetization and coercivity were ∼4.5 emu/g and
375.3 Oe, respectively, whereas for the loop at 400 K, the values
∼
From the X-ray diffraction pattern showed previously in Fig. 1,
NiO was also detected. It is reported that NiO/Ni composites exhib-
ited an exchange bias effect due to interfacial interaction between
ferromagnetic Ni and antiferromagnetic NiO [5]. Fig. 7 is the partial
enlarged drawing of the hysteresis loops. Defining HC and HC as
the coercive fields with decreasing and increasing fields, respec-
tively, a measure of the symmetry of the M–H curves was given
were ∼2.6 emu/g and ∼33.3 Oe, respectively. With the temperature
increasing, the values of coercivity and saturation magnetization
decreased due to the thermal activation effect, as shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 5 shows the relationship between the coercivity values and
temperature. A monotonic decrease in coercivity with tempera-
ture was observed. The reason could be explained by considering
the effects of thermal fluctuation of the blocked moment across
+
−
+
−
by ꢄHC = (HC + H )/2. The hysteresis loops displayed in Fig. 5
C