Organic Letters
Letter
tert-butyl piperazine-1-carboxylate (2b),8 were employed as the
coupling partners to verify the viability and limitation of N-
allylbromodifluoroacetamides 1. As shown in Scheme 2, both
amines 2a and 2b were amenable to this protocol, and they
reacted with diverse N-phenyl and N-benzyl substrates 1 to
give the desired products 3a−3al in moderate to good
chemical yields, although relatively lower yields were obtained
for morpholine 2a. The electronegativity and position of the
substituent on the phenyl or benzyl moiety of substrates 1 had
a significant impact on the chemical yield, but there was no
clear pattern. Subsequently, other heterocycles were also
evaluated, and it was noteworthy that 2,6-dimethylmorpholine
(2c) with severe steric hindrance was also suitable for this
photocatalytic transformation, furnishing the corresponding
product 3am in a satisfactory yield (67%). Moreover, N-
acetyl-, N-Cbz-, and N-ethoxycarbonyl-substituted piperazine
could deliver the desired products 3an−3ap in 39−67% yield
as well. Gratifyingly, another important amine, 4-carbethox-
ypiperidine, was also able to serve as an effective coupling
partner to react with N-allyl-2-bromo-2,2-difluoro-N-phenyl-
acetamide, albeit with a low yield (23%). However, N-alkyl- or
N-heterocyclic-substituted bromodifluoroacetamide was un-
able to proceed in the transformation. Presumably because of
their steric hindrance, internal alkenes have been tested in the
standard reaction, but no desired products were isolated. N-
(But-3-en-1-yl)-N-(dibromofluoromethyl)benzamide has been
synthesized and subjected to the standard conditions, but no
six-membered product was obtained. We also tested several
cyclic amines, including 1-methylpiperazine and piperidine,
and linear amines, but no desired amino product was detected.
Presumably, these unsuccessful amines preferred to serve as
hydrogen atom donors to undergo a HAT process rather than
as nucleophiles to proceed in SN2 nucleophilic substitution to
give the desired products. Other type of nucleophiles
(including aniline, alcohols, TMSN3, and thiophenol) have
been evaluated, but no desired products were isolated under
the current conditions. Pleasingly, a scale-up reaction of 3o was
performed, affording the desired product smoothly in a similar
yield. Further transformation of the as-prepared product 3a has
also been performed, which unfortunately only rendered a
fairly complex reaction under the current reaction conditions
(Scheme 2, bottom).
To gain mechanistic insights into this process, several
control experiments were implemented (Scheme 3; see the
experiments were performed by adding butylated hydroxyto-
luene (BHT) under the standard reaction conditions. The
formation of 3a was completely suppressed but with a 48%
yield of BHT adduct 4a, suggesting that a radical pathway was
involved in the transformation (Scheme 3a). It is worth noting
that the transformation for 3a was impeded by adding 1 equiv
of 1-methylpiperazine, and only 3,3-difluoro-4-methyl-1-
phenylpyrrolidin-2-one (5a) was obtained (Scheme 3b).
These results essentially verify our hypothesis that there was
a competitive HAT process involved in this photocatalytic
procedure. The Stern−Volmer studies revealed that both 1a
and 2a could quench the photoexcited fac-Ir(ppy)3. (For
experiments on the reaction of 1a and 2a demonstrated that
the corresponding product 3a could be produced upon
constant irradiation and in the dark, suggesting that a radical
chain propagation pathway might be involved. (For details, see
Scheme 3. Control Experiments and Proposed Mechanism
agreement with the results of the on/off experiments.
Interestingly, the bromo-substituted cyclic intermediate 6a
could directly deliver the desired product 3a even without
light, indicating that the final amination/defluorination step is
not a photocatalytic process. However, the reaction efficiency
for the conversation of 6a to 3a dramatically decreased in the
absence of NaI, illustrating that NaI was able to effectively
inhibit the HAT process and promote the desired trans-
formation (Scheme 3c). Moreover, piperidine also reacted with
6a to afford the corresponding product 3ar (Scheme 3c). On
the contrary, 3,3-difluoro-4-methylenepyrrolidin-2-one 7 was
submitted to the standard conditions with morpholine, and 3a
was obtained in 64% yield, implying that this intermediate was
possibly involved in the process.
On the basis of the previously described experimental
observation, the possible reaction mechanism is thus proposed
(Scheme 3, bottom). Upon irradiation by visible light,
photocatalyst Ir3+ was sensitized to excited *Ir3+, which
underwent an oxidative quenching by N-allylbromodifluor-
oacetamide 1 to generate the radical intermediate A and the
corresponding Ir4+. A single-electron transfer between the
iodine ion and Ir4+ would complete the catalytic cycle,
regenerating the photocatalyst and giving an iodine radical.
Subsequently, a rapid 5-exo-trig radical cyclization of A formed
the cyclic radical species B. Once the intermediate B was
captured by hydrogen atom, the byproduct was predominantly
formed. Alternatively, radical−radical cross-coupling with an
iodine radical or the direct abstraction of a bromine atom from
substrate 1 resulted in the intermediate 6. Finally, the
4756
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4754−4758