hole transfer from the dye cation to the HTM (reaction 1) and
the recombination dynamics between photo-injected electrons
and HTM cations (reaction 2).
Dye+ + HTM ? Dye + HTM+
(1)
HTM+ + e2TiO2 ? HTM
(2)
Transient absorption data were collected following optical
excitation of the Ru(L)2(NCS)2 sensitiser dye at 550 nm. In the
absence of HTM, a broad positive absorption band was
observed centred at 800 nm and a negative feature at 540 nm,
spectral features assigned as previously to the formation of the
Ru(L)2(NCS)2 cation following photoinduced electron injec-
tion.10 In the presence of the HTM a reduction in the photo-
induced dye cation signal at 800 nm is observed, along with the
appearance of a positive feature with an absorption maximum at
~ 520 nm, a spectral feature we have previously assigned to the
formation of the HTM radical cation.10
Fig. 1 Transient absorption data collected for TiO2/RuL2(NCS)2/HTM 9
films as a function of lithium ion concentration added to the HTM
deposition solution. Data collected at a probe wavelength of 520 nm,
monitoring the appearance and decay of the HTM cation absorption band,
assigned to the charge recombination reaction, eqn. (2).
The addition of Li ions to the HTM spiro-OMeTAD in the
t
The yield of the hole transfer (reaction 1) was determined as
a function of lithium ions in the presence and absence of t-butyl
pyridine in the HTM domain for both HTMs 8 and 9, as
summarized in Table 1. In the absence of Li+, the yield of hole
transfer from the dye cation to HTMs 8 and 9 was determined as
79 and 88% respectively, consistent with the large free energy
difference between the dye and HTM oxidation potentials, as
we have discussed previously.10 For HTM 8 in the absence of
tBP, it is apparent that an increase in Li+ from 0 to 0.04 M results
in a reduction in the hole transfer yield from 88 to 74%.
Increasing the lithium ion concentration beyond 0.04 M results
in a rapid loss of hole transfer yield from the dye cation to the
HTM 8 and an increase in the optical light scattering of the film.
This observation can most reasonably be rationalized in terms
of incomplete wetting of the dye sensitised TiO2 film pores by
HTM due to crystallization of the lithium triflamide salt during
spin-coating. The addition of tBP to the HTM 8 solution reduced
the sensitivity of the transient signal amplitude to lithium ion
concentration, with significant loss of hole transfer yield only
being observed for a Li+ concentration of 0.25 M, consistent
presence of BP has previously been shown to increase the
efficiency of dye sensitized photovoltaic cells.6 This increase
was attributed to a retardation of the interfacial recombination
reaction (reaction 2) due to electrostatic screening of the
photoinjected electron from the HTM cation. We consider
therefore the influence of the lithium ions upon the interfacial
recombination dynamics employing HTM 9 in the absence of
tBP, as shown in Fig. 1. It is apparent that the addition of lithium
ions results in a 5–10 fold retardation of the interfacial
recombination dynamics, consistent with desired ionic screen-
ing of the charge separated species.
In conclusion we have demonstrated that an organic hole
transporting material with TEG side chains can be used to
solvate lithium ions without co-solvents such as tert-butylpyr-
idine. We have employed such materials to control interfacial
charge transfer at a dye sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2/organic
HTM heterojunction. Specifically we have demonstrated that
lithium ion doped TEG-HTMs can be used to control interfacial
charge recombination and simultaneously achieve a high yield
of hole transfer from dye cations to HTM. Such materials
therefore provide a novel approach to achieving ion solvation in
organic HTM’s for a wide range of potential device applica-
tions.
This work was funded by the LINK Foresight Program,
Department of Trade and Industry, UK, and the Engineering
and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). TP would
like to acknowledge Johnson Matthey Ltd., the British Council
and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust for financial support.
We would also like to acknowledge the EPSRC Mass
Spectroscopy Centre for mass spectroscopy characterisation.
t
with previous reports that the co-addition of BP increases the
solubility of Li+ ions in the HTM.1 We note however that the
addition of tBP is undesirable for technological applications due
both to its volatility and carcinogenic properties.
In contrast to the data we obtained for HTM 8, we find that
the hole transfer yield for HTM 9 (bearing TEG groups) is not
reduced by Li+ for all ion concentrations studied. Furthermore
no recrystallisation of the lithium triflamide salt was observed.
We thus conclude that HTM 9 solvates lithium ions readily;
resulting in no crystallization of the lithium triflamide salt
during the spin-coating procedure. It is also apparent from the
data in Table 1 that, in the absence of tBP, the addition of Li+ to
the HTM 9 actually results in a small increase in HTM cation
yield (from 79 to 96%). This small increase most probably
arises from faster electron injection dynamics from the
RuL2(NCS)2 excited state into the TiO2 conduction band,
consistent with our previous observations.11
Notes and references
1 U. Bach, D. Lupo, P. Compte, J. E. Moser, F. Weissortel, J. Salbeck, H.
Spreitzer and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1998, 395, 583.
2 W. U. Huynh, J. J. Dittmer and A. P. Alivisatos, Science, 2002, 295,
2425.
3 S. Coe, W-K. Woo, M. Bawendi and V. Bulovic, Nature, 2002, 420,
800.
Table 1 HTM cation yields determined by transient laser spectroscopy for
TiO2/RuL2(NCS)2/HTM filmsa
4 T. M. Brown, R. H. Friend, I. S. Millard, D. J. Lacey, J. H. Burroughes
and F. Cacialli, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79()), 174; J. Kruger, U. Bach
and M. Gratzel, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12(6), 447.
5 Q. Pei, Y. Yang, G. Yu, C. Zhang and A. J. Heeger, Science, 1995, 269,
1086.
Li+
tBP
Yield (%)
[Cell]a
[Li+]/[HTM]bb [tBP]/[Li+]b HTM 9 HTM 8
6 J. Kruger, R. Plass, L. Cevey, M. Piccirelli, M. Gratzel and U. Bach,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79(13), 2085.
7 J. Morgado, F. Cacialli, R. H. Friend, B. S. Chuah, H. Rost and A. B.
Holmes, Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 3094.
8 T. Yamamoto, M. Nishiyama and Y. Koie, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39,
2367.
9 (a) M. Ranger and M. Leclerc, Can. J. Chem., 1998, 76, 1571; (b) Q. Pei
and Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7416.
10 S. A. Haque, Taiho Park, Andrew B. Holmes and J. R. Durrant,
ChemPhysChem, 2003, 1, 89.
[HTM]
—
—
—
—
—
7.3
2.2
1.1
79
96
96
91
77
78
81
88
74
—
—
73
71
22
[HTM + Li+]
0.04
0.13
0.25
[HTM + Li+ + tBP] 0.04
0.13
0.25
a The yield of hole transfer from the dye cation to the HTM was determined
by comparing the amplitude of the dye cation band at 800 nm in the presence
and absence of HTM, as detailed previously.11
11 Y. Tachibana, S. A. Haque, I. Mercer, J. R. Durrant and D. R. Klug, J.
Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 7424.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2878–2879
2879