specific interactions between metal ions and a variety of amino
acids, modification of the recognition site in other sensors is being
actively undertaken in our laboratory to develop more advanced
fluoroionophore sensors for metal ion recognition in water. These
studies will provide a foundation for future investigations of metal
ion–peptide or ion–protein interactions.
The authors are grateful to the projects of NSFC (No. 20373017
and 20473028), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and
Innovative Research Team in University (IRT0422) and the
Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities
(B06009).
Fig. 4 Proposed Pb2+–indole interaction model for Pb2+–PLT.
indicate that the entire indole ring binds to the Pb2+ in a
noncovalent interaction (possibly due to spatial positioning).
Because the chemical shift of Trp indolyl C(3) is exquisitely
sensitive to changes in the torsion angles of the side-chain, the
observed chemical shift (DdC3 = 0.318 ppm) reflects substantial
reorientation mobility of the indole unit.11 Chelation of Pb2+ with
carboxylate leads to reorganization of the indole unit to achieve
Pb2+ coordination, leading to changes in the torsion angles of the
Trp indole group (Fig. 4). This coordination mechanism was
further supported by the downfield shift of a-carbon C(9) proton
(DdH9 = 0.066 ppm) and its splitting into four peaks (Fig. 3) due to
the influence of nonequivalent hydrogen C(8)H2, with the rotatory
movement of the indole ring being limited upon binding of
Pb2+ with carboxylate. Furthermore, the chemical shifts of C(12)
(DdC12 = 20.2 ppm) and C(11) (DdC11 = 0.416 ppm) are consistent
with the formation of a hydrogen bond between the carbonyl
oxygen and amide hydrogen (Fig. 4) based on the similar proposed
model.12 Thus, the electrostatic interaction between Pb2+ and
carboxylate induced coordination of Pb2+ within the Trp moiety
and subsequent hydrogen bonding between amide groups, thereby
generating a pyrene dimer. The formation of dimer induced a
C(14) upfield shift of 2.142 ppm due to the high shielding of the
pyrene (see ESI{).
In conclusion, we have characterized a fluoroionophore sensor,
PLT, that shows high selectivity for Pb2+ over Ca2+, Cd2+, Co2+,
Cr3+, Cu2+, K+, Mg2+, Na+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ in aqueous
solution. The sensor exhibited changes in its dimer/monomer
fluorescence emission ratio (I470/I377) in response to Pb2+ in water,
allowing highly sensitive Pb2+ detection (detection limit 0.15 mM).
The high sensitivity and selectivity observed for PLT are very
important for the real-time monitoring and in situ detection of
toxic Pb2+ in the environment.3 In addition, we found that the
indole ring of PLT as well as the formation of pyrene-dimer is
crucially important for the selective recognition of Pb2+. Due to the
Notes and references
1 A. P. de Silva, D. B. Fox, A. J. M. Huxley and T. S. Moody, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 41; V. Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli,
C. Mangano, P. Pallavicini, L. Parodi and A. Poggi, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
1999, 192, 649.
2 H. Ueyama, M. Takagi and S. Takenaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
14286; A. Miyawaki, J. Llopis, R. Heim, J. M. McCaffery, J. A. Adams,
M. Ikura and R. Y. Tsien, Nature, 1997, 388, 882; K. R. Gee,
Z.-L. Zhou, W.-J. Qian and R. Kennedy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
776.
3 A. Fetch, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1998, 28, 267.
4 (a) T. Hayashita, D. Qing, M. Minagawa, J. C. Lee, C. H. Ku and
N. Teramae, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2160; (b) T. Hayashita, D. Qing,
R. A. Bartsch, S. Elshani, R. E. Hanes and N. Teramae, Supramol.
Chem., 2005, 17, 141; (c) R. Me´tivier, I. Leray and B. Valeur,
Chem. Commun., 2003, 996; (d) J. Y. Kwon, Y. J. Jang, Y. J. Lee,
K. M. Kim, M. S. Seo, W. Nam and J. Yoon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 10107.
5 L. Pu, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 1687.
6 S. L. de Wall, E. S. Meadows, L. J. Barbour and G. W. Gokel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5613; H. Kumita, T. Kato, K. Jitsukawa,
H. Einaga and H. Masuda, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 3936.
7 N. V. Kaminskaia, G. M. Ullmann, D. B. Fulton and N. M. Kostic,
Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 5004; T. Motoyama, Y. Shimazaki, T. Yajima,
Y. Nakabayashi, Y. Naruta and O. Yamauchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 7378.
8 A. Ueno, I. Suzuki and T. Osa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 6391.
9 A. Yamauchi, T. Hayashita, S. Nishizawa, M. Watanabe and
N. Teramae, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 2319.
10 DdH2, DdH4, DdH5, DdH6 and DdH7 are 0.033, 0.039, 0.064, 0.084 and
0.063 ppm, respectively; DdC2, DdC5, DdC6, DdC7, DdC7a and DdC3, DdC3a
and DdC4 are 0.171, 0.203, 0.194, 0.154, 0.098 and 20.318, 20.3 (peak is
part of overlap) and 20.162 ppm, respectively.
11 H. Sun and E. Oldfield, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 4726; Y. Li and
C. M. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 3527; O. Jardetzky,
K. Akasaka, D. Vogel, S. Morris and K. C. Holmes, Nature, 1978, 273,
564.
12 I. I. Schuster, J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 1656.
2704 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 2702–2704
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006