A closer inspection of the data on the gels derived from the
compounds having the same fluoroalkyl chain-length but
different spacers led to a few interesting correlations. Both
Bangalore, is thanked for financial support to AJS. We also
thank an anonymous referee for valuable comments.
9 2 9
DC23C F19 and DC24CH C F19 formed gels in DMSO and the
enthalpy of gel–sol transition (80 and 85 kJ mol), the storage
modulus (19 000 and 20 500 Pa) and the stiffness (11 and 12) of
their DMSO gels were very similar. The two corresponding litho
Notes and references
1
2
3
P. Terech and R. G. Weiss, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 3133.
L. Estroff and A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 1201.
Molecular Gels: Materials with Self-assembled Fibrillar Networks, ed.
P. Terech and R. G. Weiss, Springer, Dordrecht, 2006.
derivatives (LC23
similarities in their CGCs (0.2 and 0.3%) and storage modulus
600 Pa for both). There were similarities between the shorter
chain (–C F ) derivatives, too. They are either non-gelators or
9 2 9
C F19 and LC24CH C F19) also showed some
4
(a) N. M. Sangeetha and U. Maitra, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 821;
(
(
b) A. R. Hirst, B. Escuder, J. F. Miravet and D. K. Smith, Angew.
7
15
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8002; (c) S. Banerjee, R. K. Das and
U. Maitra, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6649; (d) M. Zelzer and
R. V. Ulijn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3351; (e) J. W. Steed, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 1379; (f) A. Dawn, T. Shiraki, S. Haraguchi,
S.-i. Tamaru and S. Shinkai, Chem.–Asian J., 2011, 6, 266.
S. Mukhopadhyay and U. Maitra, Curr. Sci., 2004, 87,
1666.
(a) H. Sobotka and N. J. Czeczowiczka, J. Colloid Sci., 1958, 13, 188;
(b) A. Rich and D. M. Blow, Nature, 1958, 423; (c) N. Ramanathan,
A. L. Currie and J. R. Colvin, Nature, 1961, 779.
poor gelators. For example, DC C F is not a very efficient
23 7 15
gelator (CGC 1.5%) of DMSO whereas LC C F is a poor
3 7 15
2
gelator capable of forming gels only above 2.0%. Similarly,
15, DC24CH 15 and LC24CH 15 were either
C24CH
2
C
7
F
2
C
7
F
2 7
C F
5
6
non-gelators or formed weak/partial gels in organic–aqueous
mixtures.
7
(a) S. B. Schryver, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1914, 87, 366; (b)
S. B. Schryver, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1916, 89, 176; (c)
Y. Qiao, Y. Lin, Y. Wang, Z. Yang, J. Liu, J. Zhou, Y. Yan and
Y. Huang, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 4500; (d) Y. Qiao, Y. Lin, Z. Yang,
H. Chen, S. Zhang, Y. Yan and J. Huang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2010,
114, 11725; (e) S. Bhowmik, S. Banerjee and U. Maitra, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 8642.
Conclusions
We have reported the synthesis and gelation studies of a new
class of perfluorinated analogues of bile acids. They formed gels
2
in aromatic hydrocarbons, DMSO and in DMSO/DMF–H O
mixtures depending on the choice of the bile acid moiety, the
perfluoroalkyl segment and the spacer. The variation in the
gelation properties of the derivatives through a modulation of
the aforementioned structural aspects essentially points out the
fine balance that is required between the sovent–gelator and
gelator–gelator interactions for effective gel formation. These
gels were mostly transparent with reasonably high thermal
stability. The thermal stability, the mechanical properties and the
morphology of the gels were investigated in detail using appro-
priate techniques. Rheological investigations demonstrated that
these gels behaved as viscoelastic materials and the mechanical
properties of these gels could be modulated by changing either
the bile acid moiety or by varying the length of the fluoroalkyl
segment. Although there are a few reports in the literature on the
fluorinated gelators, to the best of our knowledge these are the
first examples of fluorinated gelators derived from the bile acids.
The presence of the perfluoroalkyl chains which are simulta-
neously hydrophobic and lipophobic introduced new properties
to these compounds. For example, the efficient organogelators
among these derivatives are the ones possessing deoxycholic and
lithocholic acid moieties whereas in the literature most of the
reported organogelators are based on the cholic acid skeleton.
8
(a) U. Mairta, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. Sarkar, P. Rao and S. S. Indi,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2281; (b) N. M. Sangeetha,
S. Bhat, A. R. Choudhury, U. Maitra and P. Terech, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2004, 108, 16056; (c) P. Terech, N. M. Sangeetha and
U. Maitra, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 15224; (d) N. M. Sangeetha
and U. Maitra, Macromol. Symp., 2006, 241, 60; (e) P. Babu,
D. Chopra, T. N. Guru Row and U. Maitra, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2005, 3, 3695.
9
Y. Hishikawa, K. Sada, R. Watanabe, M. Miyata and K. Hanabusa,
Chem. Lett., 1998, 795.
0 H. M. Willemen, T. A. Vermonden, T. M. Marcelis and
1
E. J. R. Sudh o€ lter, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 2329.
11 (a) H. M. Willemen, T. A. Vermonden, T. M. Marcelis and
E. J. R. Subh o€ lter, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 7102; (b) H. M. Willemen,
T. M. Marcelis, E. J. R. Subh o€ lter, W. G. Bouwman, B. Dem ꢀe and
P. Terech, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 2075.
12 V. Noponen, Nonappa, M. Lahtinen, A. Valkonen, H. Salo,
€
E. Kolehmainen and E. Sievanen, Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 3789.
3 Nonappa and U. Maitra, Soft Matter, 2007, 3, 1428.
4 C. L. Young, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1969, 65, 2639.
5 (a) K. Shinoda, M. Hato and T. Hatashi, J. Phys. Chem., 1972, 76,
909; (b) T. Kunitake and N. Higashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107,
1
1
1
6
92; (c) W. Guo, M. Fung, A. Edgar and E. A. O’Rear, J. Phys.
Chem., 1992, 96, 10068; (d) R. Oda, I. Huc, D. Daninoa and
Y. Talmon, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 9759.
1
1
6 R. J. Twieg, T. P. Russell, R. Siemens and J. F. Rabolt,
Macromolecules, 1986, 18, 1361.
7 (a) P. L. Nostro, C. Y. Ku, S.-H. Chen and J.-S. Lin, J. Phys. Chem.,
The presence of the CO
2
-philic fluoroalkyl groups also makes
1995, 99, 10858; (b) C. Y. Ku, P. L. Nostro and S.-H. Chen, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 1997, 101, 908.
them promising candidates for forming aerogels in supercritical
29
CO
2
.
18 M. George, S. L. Snyder, P. Terech, C. J. Glinka and R. G. Weiss, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10275.
1
9 M. Yamanaka, K. Sada, M. Miyata, K. Hanabusa and K. Nakano,
Chem. Commun., 2006, 2248.
Acknowledgements
2
0 (a) J. M. DeSimone, Z. Guan and C. S. Elsbemd, Science, 1992, 257,
545; (b) T. Hoefling, D. Sofesky, M. Reid, E. Beckman and
R. M. J. Enick, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 1992, 5, 237; (c) K. A. Consani
and R. D. Smith, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 1990, 3, 51.
1 For reviews on aerogels see: (a) N. H u€ sing and U. Schubert, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 23; (b) A. C. Pierre and G. M. Pajonk,
Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 4243.
2 For a report on aerogel formation from a series of perfluorinated low
molecular mass gelators see: C. Shi, Z. Huang, S. Kilic, J. Xu,
R. M. Enick, E. J. Beckman, A. J. Carr, R. E. Melendez and
A. D. Hamilton, Science, 1999, 286, 1540.
This work has been supported by the Indo-French Center for the
Promotion of Advance Research (IFCPAR), New Delhi. The
Institute Nanoscience Initiative (INI) is acknowledged for TEM
and SEM facility and Mr T.B.N. Satyanarayana for recording
the SEM images. The Department of Science & Technology is
thanked for a J.C. Bose Fellowship to UM. The Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi is thanked
for the award of Research Fellowship to SB and JNCASR,
2
2
1
4704 | J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 14693–14705
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011