1886
M. Baidossi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 1885–1887
Table 1. Domino condensation and reduction results (Eq. 2)
We have developed the condensation reaction of ethyl
cyanoacetate with aldehydes or ketones combined with
the simultaneous reduction of the C@C bond under
300 kPa pressure of dihydrogen in the presence of a mix-
ture of the EDDA and Pd/C catalysts (Eq. 2)
Entry
Substrate
Time
(h)
Yield (%) and
conversion (%)
(based on GC)
1a
Benzaldehyde
4-Anisaldehyde
4.5
4.5
99(100)
85(100)
92(100)
90(100)
100(100)
71(100)
70(100)
2a
3a
2,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde
2,3-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde
4-Isopropylbenzaldehyde
2-Naphthaldehyde
4-Chlorobenzaldehyde
Propanal
4.5
4.5
4a
O
5a
4.5
4.5
6a
10% EDDA
10% Pd/C
[bmim]BF4
O
1
1
2
R
R
7a
5
(110209)2
O
H
2
CH CH
C
O
CN
+
+
+ H2O
8a,c
9a,c
10a,c
11a,c
12a
13a
14a
15b
16b
17b
300 kPa
25-90°
4-12 h
R2
R
CN
O
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
1290(100)
1295(100)
10 90(100)
4.5
3
1
2
R1, R2 = H,alkyl or aryl
90-100%
ð2Þ
Phenylacetaldehyde
Acetophenone
Cyclohexanone
97(100)
85(30)
100(100)
98(75)
27(50)
98(90)
4
4
Unpredictably when reaction 2was carried out in a
common organic solvent such as DMA a considerable
amount of benzyl alcohol and toluene was formed by
competing direct hydrogenation of the starting alde-
hyde. Evidently the selective reaction 2is unique to
the IL environment.
Ethyl acetoacetate
Diethyl malonate
Ethyl cyanoacetate
15
17
5
a Ethyl cyanoacetate was used as substrate.
b 4-Anisaldehyde was used as substrate.
c The reaction was carried out at room temperature. Experimental
procedure: see text.
In a typical procedure, a 22 ml Parr autoclave equipped
with a magnetic stirrer was charged with 25 mg of 5%
Pd/C (Sigma–Aldrich, 0.05 mmol) dispersed in 1.0 g of
[bmim]BF4, this IL was prepared according to the liter-
ature,9) 113.0 mg (1 mmol) of ethyl cyanoacetate, 2,
15 mg EDDA (0.1 mmol) and 1 mmol of a ketone or
aldehyde, 1. The autoclave was purged three times with
dihydrogen and a pressure of 300 kPa was maintained
throughout the process. The autoclave was placed in a
thermostatic oil bath for the desired time. After cooling,
the reaction mixture was extracted four times with 3 ml
portions of diethyl ether. Analysis and mass balance
were accomplished using gas chromatography. The
combined extracts were evaporated under vacuum and
purified over a silica gel column using 20 ml of a 5:1
petroleum ether–ethyl acetate mixture as eluent. The
products were identified using mass spectroscopy. The
mass balance was calculated based on GC analysis using
authentic samples as standards.
hyde, 2-tolualdehyde, 4-anisaldehyde, 2,4-dimethoxy-
benzaldehyde, 2,3-dimethoxyacetaldehyde, 4-isoprop-
ylbenzaldehyde, 2-naphthaldehyde, 2-, 3- and 4-chloro-
benzaldehyde after 4.5 h (Table 1, entries 1–7).
The yield of the saturated aromatic products exceeded
95% in all cases with the exception of 2-naphth-
aldehyde (71% of the saturated product and 28% of
the unsaturated product). This is probably due to steric
hindrance affecting the hydrogenation rate (Table 1,
entry 6). The reactions of chlorobenzaldehydes suffered
from competing dehydrochlorination which decreased
the yields of the desired product to 70% (Table 1,
entry 7).
Ketones such as acetophenone and cyclohexanone re-
acted under the latter conditions to give complete con-
version and practically quantitative yields of the
saturated product (Table 1, entries 13–14).
Both the Pd/C and EDDA catalysts remained in the
ionic liquid after the extraction step with diethyl ether
and were consequently recycled for a second catalytic se-
quence. The combined solvent and catalyst mixture
could be used in five consecutive experiments without
any loss in activity and selectivity. The prompt disper-
sion of the Pd/C catalyst in [bmim]PF6 and its conve-
nient reuse were previously reported by Hagiwara
et al.10 who applied this system to the Heck reaction.
Other active methylene compounds such as ethyl aceto-
acetate, diethyl malonate, and ethyl cyanoacetate re-
acted with aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes in a
similar manner (Table 1, entries 15–17).
In view of a kinetic analysis of the second reaction with
acetaldehyde as an electrophile (based on GC analyses
of samples taken from the reaction mixture every
30 min), we asserted that the rate of the condensation
step is approximately an order of magnitude faster than
the hydrogenation step.
With aliphatic linear aldehydes as substrates, the second
reaction, took place swiftly at 25 °C. Thus acetalde-
hyde, propanal, butanal, pentanal, hexanal, and phen-
ylacetaldehyde all reacted according to Eq. 2 with
100% conversion after 12h with yields of the saturated
products exceeding 90% in all cases (Table 1, entries
8–12).
We verified that competing condensation reactions of
the aldehydes with the weakly acidic IL solvent (an
imidazole salt with a pKa = 24) reported by Mereu and
co-workers11 did not occur under our reaction
conditions.
Aromatic aldehydes required a higher temperature. At
95 °C complete conversion was recorded for benzalde-