2
K. Zhang et al. / Dyes and Pigments 102 (2014) 1e5
NMR spectra in CDCl3 were measured with a 400 MHz Bruker
spectrometer using TMS as internal reference for 1H and 13C NMR.
Accurate mass correction was measured with MALDI Tof Mass
Spectrometer (MALDI micro MX). Electrochemical studies made
use of cyclic voltammetry (CV) with a conventional 3-electrode
system using a BAS 100W electrochemical analyzer in deoxygen-
ated and anhydrous CH2Cl2 at room temperature. UVevis absorp-
tion spectrums were measured with UVevis Spectrophotometer
(HP 8453). Fluorescence spectra were obtained with a FP-6500
spectrophotometer (Jasco, Japan). Melting points were measured
on a Digital Melting Point Apparatus without correction.
142.6,142.2,142.2,142.1,132.0,131.8, 130.4,130.3,130.1, 127.8, 127.8,
126.3, 126.0, 124.3, 124.2, 124.1, 122.8, 120.7, 54.9, 47.2, 35.2, 33.5,
27.9, 26.9, 22.7, 13.8, 10.2; TOF HRMS ES þ calcd for C57H55N4
795.4427 [M þ H] þ, found 795.4436.
Compound LT3: light yellow powder, yield 76%. m.p. 225.6e
227.3 ꢂC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d (ppm): 8.67 (s,
2H), 8.44e8.42 (d, J ¼ 6.8 Hz, 4H), 8.31e8.29 (t, J ¼ 4.4 Hz, 2H),
8.09e8.06 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 4H), 7.87e7.81 (dd, J ¼ 8 Hz, 15.6 Hz, 4H),
2.38e2.31 (t, J ¼ 14.8 Hz, 4H), 0.95e0.73 (m, 18H), 0.55e0.52 (m,
12H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d (ppm): 154.0, 153.7,
153.2, 142.0, 141.8, 141.5, 136.5, 132.0, 130.0, 129.4, 129.4, 128.8,
128.7, 124.7, 124.6, 124.5, 121.8, 120.8, 55.1, 46.6, 35.1, 33.5, 28.0,
26.8, 22.6, 13.8, 10.2; TOF HRMS ES þ calcd for C53H51N4 743.4114
[M þ H] þ, found 743.4125.
Two-photon absorption spectra were measured by using
a
femtosecond (fs) fluorescence measurement technique as
described in the literature [18]. The samples were dissolved in THF
at a concentration of 1.0*10ꢀ5 M. Fluorescence emission curve
excited by different laser wavelengths, from 700 nm to 1040 nm
Compound LT4: green yellow powder, yield 84%. m.p. 160.1e
162.3 ꢂC [23].
(10 nm per step) was detected. The TPA cross-section (
d
) of chro-
Compound LT5: milk white floc, yield 79%. m.p. 173.1e174.5 ꢂC
[24].
mophores LT1eLT3 in THF (1.0*10ꢀ5 M) were measured using
fluorescein in pH ¼ 11 NaOH aqueous solution as the reference [19].
Compound LT6: milk white powder, yield 81%. m.p. 191.1e
The
d was calculated according to the following equation [20].
192.8 ꢂC [25].
ds
¼
dr ꢁ ðSs ꢁ Fr
ꢁ
hr ꢁ N Þ ðS ꢁ Fs
ꢁ
hs ꢁ NsÞ
(1)
=
r
r
3. Results and discussion
where the subscripts s and r stand for the sample and reference
molecule, S is the corrected intensity of two-photon-induced
3.1. Design and synthesis
fluorescence,
centration of the chromophore, and
the experimental setup, dr is the TPA cross section of the reference
molecule.
F
is the fluorescence quantum yield, N is the con-
is the collection efficiency of
Chromophores LT1eLT3 were synthesized by one-step
condensation reaction using TABEF$4HCl as the key intermediate,
and had the similar structures and p-conjugated length. To obtain
h
the larger two-photon absorption cross section, three quadrupolar
chromophores LT1eLT3 with the changes of the substituents at the
terminal position were synthesized. In the synthesis of compound
LT1, two isomers were found in the product. The symmetric com-
pound LT1 can be separated from them through column chroma-
tography. The other compounds LT2 and LT3 have the certain
structures without isomer. All these compounds LT1eLT6 were
synthesized as described in Scheme 1. Compounds LT1eLT3 and
compounds LT4eLT6 correspondingly have the similar structure.
2.2. Theoretical calculations
In order to understand the nature of the ground-state and the
low-lying excited states, quantum chemical calculations were
performed for chromophores LT1eLT3. The structures of them were
optimized using density functional theory (DFT) with B3LYP func-
tional and 6-31G basis set. All calculations were performed with
Gaussian 09 [21].
3.2. Linear photophysical properties
2.3. Synthesis
The comprehensive photophysical properties of these com-
pounds in CH2Cl2 and THF are listed in Table 1. Linear absorption
and single-photon excited fluorescence (SPEF) spectra of chromo-
phores LT1eLT3 in THF are respectively shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b).
A mixture of 0.133 g 1,8-Naphthalic anhydride (0.67 mmol),
0.2 g TABEF$4HCl [22] (0.335 mmol) and 5 ml glacial acetic acid
was heated to reflux for 4 h under argon. After cooling, the re-
action product was precipitated by the addition of MeOH (25 ml),
collected by vacuum filtration, and dried in air. The crude
product was dissolved in dichloromethane, preadsorbed on silica
gel, and purified by column chromatography (silica gel,
CH2Cl2:hexane ¼ 1:1 as eluent, gathering the band (Rf ¼ 0.2))
resulting in an orange solid compound LT1. (118 mg, yield: 45%)
Compounds LT2eLT6 were synthesized in the similar procedure.
Compound LT1: orange powder, yield 45%. m.p. >300 ꢂC. 1H
Due to the larger
p-conjugated system, compounds LT1eLT3
exhibit longer absorption wavelength and larger molar extinction
coefficient compared with reference compounds LT4eLT6, respec-
tively. As shown in Table 1, one can see that the absorption peak
position and emission peak position of compounds LT1eLT6 all
exhibit slight blue shift from CH2Cl2 to THF. Due to rigid structure
without geometry relaxation upon photoexcitation, compounds
LT2 and LT3, exhibit the smaller Stocks Shifts and the higher
quantum yields. Remarkably, they exhibit considerable molar
extinction coefficients, which are more than 105. Caused by the
introduction of benzimidazole unit, compounds LT1 and LT4 show
smaller molar extinction coefficients, and larger Stocks Shifts of
them were caused by the ICT effect. Notably compound LT1 has the
lower quantum yield compared with compound LT4 due to intro-
duction of one more benzimidazole unit, and this have been veri-
fied by the compounds of perylene diimide class [26].
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d (ppm): 9.08 (s, 2H), 8.89e8.88
(d, J ¼ 5.6 Hz, 4H), 8.31e8.29 (d, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, 2H), 8.16e8.14 (d,
J ¼ 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.89e7.82 (m, 6H), 2.20 (s, 4H), 0.91e0.73 (m, 18H),
0.59e0.51 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d
(ppm): 161.0, 149.9, 149.7, 144.0, 139.8, 135.5, 132.6, 131.9, 127.7,
127.7, 127.2, 123.7,121.2,115.5,107.5, 54.7, 46.2, 34.8, 33.7, 28.2, 26.8,
22.9, 14.1, 10.3; TOF HRMS ES þ calcd for C53H51N4O2 775.4012
[M þ H] þ, found 775.3949.
Compound LT2: yellow powder, yield 72%. m.p. 243.1e245.7 ꢂC.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d
(ppm): 9.34e9.19 (m, 4H),
3.3. Electrochemical properties
8.70e8.66 (t, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, 2H), 8.46e8.37 (m, 6H), 7.78e7.67 (m, 8H),
2.46e2.45 (d, J ¼ 5.2 Hz, 4H), 1.04e0.73 (m, 18H), 0.59e0.51 (m,
In order to investigate the electrochemical behavior of these
compounds, CV measurements were performed in CH2Cl2 solution
12H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢂC, TMS):
d (ppm): 153.7, 142.9,