M. Canbulat Özdemir, E. Aktan and O. S¸ ahin
Journal of Molecular Structure 1242 (2021) 130684
Table 1
Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for 2a–2c.
have been synthesized. The structures of the salts were confirmed
by appropriate spectroscopic methods (1H, 13C, and 19 F NMR,
FTIR) and elemental analysis. The experimental evidence of the
association of like-charged ions in synthesized salts was demon-
strated through single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (SCXRD).
Dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D3) studies
were also conducted to compare experimentally obtained and the-
oretically calculated results [37].
2a
2b
2c
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
C
22H23N4Cl2PF6
C22H23N4Br2PF6
648.23
C24H29N4O2PF6
550.48
559.31
Monoclinic
P21/n
Monoclinic
C2/c
Monoclinic
C2/c
˚
a (A)
8.9958 (6)
23.5782 (17)
11.7593 (9)
91.057 (2)
2493.8 (3)
4
8.9324 (7)
21.0010 (18)
13.4307 (11)
94.227 (3)
2512.6 (4)
4
9.4422 (11)
21.107 (3)
13.3039 (13)
96.654 (5)
2633.6 (5)
4
˚
b (A)
˚
c (A)
β (°)
2. Experimental section
3
˚
V (A )
Z
Dc (g cm−3
)
1.490
1.714
1.388
2.1. Materials and instrumentation
μ (mm−1
)
0.39
3.35
0.18
θ range (°)
Measured refls.
3.1–26.2
41,730
3.0–28.3
20,454
3.6–26.2
27,769
All the reagents and solvents were supplied commercially
and handled as received. Acetic acid (glacial), acetylacetone,
acetonitrile, 4-chlorophenylhydrazine hydrochloride (for synthe-
sis), 4-bromophenylhydrazine hydrochloride (for synthesis), 4-
methoxyphenylhydrazine hydrochloride (for synthesis), ethyl ac-
etate, ethanol (absolute), sodium chloride, n-hexane were obtained
from Merck. Sodium bicarbonate, sodium sulfate, and hexafluo-
rophosphoric acid (~55 wt.% in H2O) were purchased from Sigma
Aldrich.
Independent refls.
4579
2327
2730
Rint
0.073
0.066
0.054
S
1.06
1.13
1.15
R1/wR2
˚
ꢀρmax/ꢀρmin (eA
0.104/0.219
0.57/–0.47
0.070/0.128
0.52/–0.41
0.065/0.153
0.21/–0.28
−3
)
3,5-dimethyl-1-(p-methoxyphenyl)pyrazolium hexafluorophosphate
(2c): FTIR (ATR, cm−1) νmax= 3444, 3144, 2970, 1598, 1513, 1453,
1318, 1257, 1171, 1039, 848, 555. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ = 2.28
(s, 3H, -CH3), 2.35 (s, 3H, -CH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, p-(OCH3)-pH), 6.19 (s,
1H, -CH), 7.0–7.03 (d, 2H, pH, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.29–7.32 (d, 2H, pH,
J = 8.9 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ = 11.83, 12.06, 55.70, 107.44,
114.89, 127.15, 128.51, 143.54, 147.65, 160.53. 19 F-NMR (CDCl3,
ppm): −70.79, −73.32. Analysis: calcd for C24H29F6N4O2P: C 52.36
H 5.31 N 10.18. Found: C 52.30 H 5.28 N 10.20. Yield: 90 % (white
crystal), M.p: 133 °C.
The synthesis of 3,5-dimethyl-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)-1H-
pyrazole derivatives (1a-1c) was carried out under microwave
irradiation by the multimode oven (Microsynth-Milestone). NMR
spectra (1H, 13C, 19 F) of the salts (2a–2c) were recorded on a
Bruker Avance 300 Ultra-Shield spectrometer. FTIR spectra of all
compounds were acquired with a “Thermo Fischer Scientific Nico-
let iS10 FTIR” spectrometer. Their melting points were measured
ꢀꢀ
by the “Electrothermal 9200 melting point apparatus and were
not corrected. The elemental analysis of the salts was obtained by
ꢀꢀ
the “LECO, CHNS-932 elemental analyzer.
2.2. Synthesis and characterization of the pyrazolium based tunable
protic salts (2a-2c)
2.3. X-ray diffraction analysis
The data collection was performed on a D8-QUEST diffractome-
ter equipped with graphite-monochromatic Mo-Kα radiation by se-
lecting suitable crystals of 2a-2c at 296 K. The structures of the
salts were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-2013 [38] and
refined by full-matrix least-squares methods on F2 using SHELXL-
2013 [39]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic
parameters. The H atom of the N atom was located in a difference
map and refined freely. The other H atoms were located from dif-
ferent maps and then treated as riding atoms with a C-H distance
The
appropriate 3,5-dimethyl-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)−1H-
pyrazole compound (1a-1c) (5 mmol), which was synthesized
under MW irradiation by following a reported procedure [36], was
dissolved in ethanol (5 mL). Hexafluorophosphoric acid (5 mmol,
55% in water) was added dropwise to the solution stirring at room
temperature, and continued to stir for 30 min. The solid formed
was collected by filtration, dissolved in acetonitrile (10 mL), and
refluxed with active charcoal. After filtration, the solvent was evap-
orated. Their single crystals were acquired by slow evaporation of
ethanol solutions of the salts.
˚
of 0.93-0.96 A. The following procedures were implemented in our
analysis: data collection: Bruker APEX2 [40]; the program used for
molecular graphics were as follows: MERCURY programs [41]; soft-
ware used to prepare material for publication: WinGX [42]. Details
of data collection and crystal structure determinations are given in
1-(p-chlorophenyl)-3,5-dimethylpyrazolium hexafluorophosphate
(2a): FTIR (ATR, cm−1) νmax= 3424, 3115, 2987, 2927, 1601, 1550,
1495, 1413, 1093, 846, 555. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ = 2.33 (s,
3H, -CH3), 2.43 (s, 3H, -CH3), 6.27(s, 1H, -CH), 7.40–7.43 (d, 2H,
pH, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.51–7.54 (d, 2H, pH, J = 8.8 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3,
ppm) δ = 11.66, 11.88, 108.30, 127.05, 130.14, 133.06, 136.46,
144.31, 147.85. 19 F-NMR (CDCl3, ppm): −70.58, −73.11. Analysis:
calcd for C22H23Cl2F6N4P: C 47.24 H 4.14 N 10.02. Found: C 46.74
H 4.11 N 9.93. Yield: 80 % (white crystal), M.p: 117 °C.
2.4. Quantum chemical calculations
1-(p-bromophenyl)−3,5-dimethylpyrazolium hexafluorophosphate
(2b): FTIR (ATR, cm−1) νmax= 3423, 3144, 3107, 2971, 2925, 1597,
1549, 1491, 1408, 1071, 843, 555. 1H-NMR (DMSO–d6, ppm):
δ = 2.17 (s, 3H, -CH3), 2.30 (s, 3H, -CH3), 6.09 (s, 1H, -CH), 7.45–
7.48 (d, 2H, pH, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.66–7.69 (d, 2H, pH, J = 8.7 Hz).
13C-NMR (DMSO–d6, ppm) δ =12.56, 13.56, 108.11, 120.27, 126.41,
132.47, 138.96, 140.25, 148.64. 19 F-NMR (CDCl3, ppm): −70.41,
−72.97. Analysis: calcd for C22H23Br2F6N4P: C 40.76 H 3.58 N 8.64.
Found: C 40.25 H 3.68 N 8.54. Yield: 82 % (white crystal), M.p: 141
°C.
The molecular geometry optimizations and the maps of
molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) of the 3,5-dimethyl-1-(p-
substitutedphenyl)pyrazolium hexafluorophosphates (2a–2c) were
carried out using a 6–31G(d) basis set in which B3LYP-D3 func-
tional were implemented in the gas phase. Each optimized struc-
ture of the salts was confirmed to be local minima on the po-
tential energy surface through vibrational frequency analysis to
prevent imaginary frequencies. The geometry optimizations of the
salts were conducted based on their crystal structures using the
Gaussian 09 program package [43].
2