1176
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1176-1178
toxic compound detrimental to the longevity of cells,9 and
Sp in Tr a p p in g w ith
(c) a “dormant” compound (perhaps a hydroxylamine)
which exposes itself to EPR spectroscopy only after free
radicals are formed.10 For best results pure DMPO must
be kept under N2 in the dark and at dry ice temperature
even during shipping, and used immediately after warm-
ing to room temperature.
5-Meth yl-5-p h en ylp yr r olin e N-Oxid e. A
Rep la cem en t for 5,5-Dim eth ylp yr r olin e
N-Oxid e
Nagaraju Sankuratri, Edward G. J anzen,*,†
Melinda S. West, and J . Lee Poyer
4
5
3
2
4
5
3
2
Free Radical Biology and Aging Research Program,
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
Me
Me
C6H5
Me
1
N
1
N
O
O
DMPO
5,5-dimethylpyrroline
MPPO
5-methyl-5-phenylpyrroline N-oxide
Received August 1, 1996
N-oxide
5,5-Dimethylpyrroline N-oxide (DMPO)1 has become
the most commonly used spin trap in biological systems
to date. This is because the hydroxyl radical spin adduct
gives a simple and distinctive EPR spectrum2 consisting
of four peaks with relative intensity 1:2:2:1, and the
superoxide/hydroperoxyl radical spin adduct gives a
different but also distinctive multiline EPR spectrum2
composed of 6 major peaks plus additional partially
resolved doublets. These unique signatures are readily
recognizable in the presence of each other and thus
provide a convenient approach to the study of systems
where both the hydroxyl and superoxide/hydroperoxyl
radicals are produced simultaneously. Moreover, since
EPR spectroscopy is a very sensitive technique the spin
trapping method is unequaled in its capability to detect
low concentrations of these two species when in situ
experiments can be arranged. It has been shown that
DMPO is better than cytochrome c in detecting super-
oxide,3,4 and alternate methods for detecting hydroxyl
radical by salicylate or phenylalanine hydroxylation5 also
bring along with them problems associated with meta-
bolic production of similar derivatives. Cytochrome c and
salicylate are the “benchmark” methods for detecting
superoxide and hydroxyl radicals, respectively.
However, a major concern in the use of DMPO is the
presence of artifacts some of which appear to be due to
compounds also produced in the synthesis of DMPO.6
Small molecular weight nitrones are very reactive mol-
ecules and self-reaction is usually prevented by attaching
substituents with sterically hindering groups or conjuga-
tion.7,8 DMPO is relatively unprotected and contains no
aryl groups. The melting point is low, and the colorless
crystalline state is difficult to achieve. Most preparations
result in a liquid which acquires a yellow color on
standing. This product often contains (a) an EPR signal
which confounds the analysis of an EPR spectrum,6 (b) a
We have synthesized a DMPO replacement which gives
similar hydroxyl radical and superoxide/hydroperoxyl
radical spin adduct signatures as DMPO but which can
be readily prepared in pure form and appears to be stable
under normal shelf-life conditions indefinitely. Here we
describe the first synthesis of 5-methyl-5-phenylpyrroline
N-oxide (MPPO). Derivatives of DMPO for the purpose
of spin trapping have been synthesized before, but all of
them suffer from serious drawbacks ranging from com-
plex EPR spectra of spin adducts to expensive pathways
for synthesis. Moreover, simply placing a phenyl or
methyl group in the 3- or 4-position leaves the 3- or
4-tertiary carbon-hydrogen bond vulnerable to reaction
with the same radicals the nitronyl function is designed
to trap. MPPO has the carbon position on carbon-5
protected with a methyl group.
The prime reason for seeking improvements in spin
trapping methodology is for use in biological applica-
tions.11 Although in vivo detection of free radicals by
magnetic resonance is making progress,12 there is still a
problem with sensitivity. The sensitivity of these meth-
ods is directly dependent on the number of EPR lines
attributed to any spin adduct. Thus, the most desirable
spin traps are those which give the least number of EPR
hyperfine lines and which produce the most persistent
spin adducts with no artifacts.6
The approach we have used to synthesize MPPO is a
textbook preparation of synthon I, namely, 2-methylpyr-
roline N-oxide by Michael addition of nitromethane to
methyl vinyl ketone followed by reductive cyclization with
zinc:
(9) Ueno, I.; Kohno, M.; Mitsuta, K.; Mizuta, Y.; Kanegasaki, S. J .
Biochem. 1989, 105, 905-910.
(10) Makino, K.; Imaishi, H.; Morinishi, S.; Hagiwara, T.; Takeuchi,
T.; Murakami, A. Free Radical Res. Commun. 1989, 6, 19.
(11) (a) J anzen, E. G. Free Radical Biol. 1980, 4, 115. (b) McCay, P.
B.; Noguchi, T.; Fong, K.-L.; Lai, E. K.; Poyer, J . L. Free Radical Biol.
1980, 4, 153. (c) J anzen, E. G. In Oxygen Radicals in Biological
Systems, Methods in Enzymology; Packer, L., Ed.; Academic Press,
Inc.: New York, NY, 1984; Vol. 105, p 188. (d) Mason, R. P. In Spin
Labeling in Pharmacology; Holtzman, J . L., Ed.; Academic Press: New
York, 1984; p 87. (e) Rosen, G. M. Adv. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1985,
1, 345. (f) Mason, R. P.; Maples, K. R.; Knecht, K. T. Electron Spin
Resonance; Symons, M. C. R., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London,
1989, Vol. 11B, p 1. (g) Dodd, N. S. F. Electron Spin Resonance;
Symons, M. C. R. Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, 1990, Vol.
12A, p 136.
† Alternate address: Departments of Clinical Studies and Biomedi-
cal Sciences Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph,
Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
(1) J anzen, E. G.; Liu, J . I.-P. J . Magn. Reson. 1973, 9, 510.
(2) Harbour, J . R.; Chow, V.; Bolton, J . R. Can. J . Chem. 1974, 52,
3549.
(3) Kotake, Y.; Reinke, L. A.; Tanigawa, T.; Koshida, H. Free Radical
Biol. Med. 1994, 17, 215.
(4) Sanders, S. P.; Harrison, S. J .; Kuppusamy, P.; Sylvester, J . T.;
Zweier, J . L. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1994, 16, 753.
(5) Powell, S. R. Free Radical Res. 1994, 21, 355.
(6) Tomasi, A.; Iannone, A. In EMR of Paramagnetic Molecules -
Biol. Magn. Reson. Plenum Press: New York, NY, 1993; Vol. 13,
Chapter 9, p 353.
(7) J anzen, E. G.; Haire, D. L. In Advances in Free Radical
Chemistry; Tanner, D. D., Ed.; J AI Press, Inc.: Greenwich, CT, 1990,
Chapter 6, p 253.
(12) (a) Lurie, D. L.; McLay, J .; Nicholson, I.; Mallard, J . R. J . Magn.
Reson. 1991, 95, 191. (b) Halpern, H. J .; Pou, S.; Peric, M.; Yu, C.;
Barth, E.; Rosen, G. M. J . Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 218. (c) Halpern, H.
J .; Yu, C.; Barth, E.; Peric, M.; Rosen, G. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1995, 92, 796. Recently phosphorylated spin traps have been
published with more persistent spin adducts but additional hyperfine
splittings are produced in this case: Zeghdaoui, A.; Tuccio, B.; Finet,
J .-P.; Cerri, V.; Tordo, P. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1995, 2087
and references therein.
(8) J anzen, E. G. In Bioradicals Detected by ESR Spectroscopy;
Ohya-Nishiguchi, Packer, L., Eds.; Birkhau¨ser Verlag: Switzerland,
1995; p 113.
S0022-3263(96)01476-4 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society