U.K. Gautam et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 375 (2003) 560–564
561
ꢀ
the growth of the resulting phase could be arrested
giving rise to toluene-soluble monodisperse CdS
nanocrystals. Besides the yield of the CdS nano-
crystals, this method has certain advantages over
other techniques. The reaction is carried out in a
closed vessel and hence inert conditions are not
required. Since the nanocrystals are toluene solu-
ble, they can be size selectively precipitated using a
polar solvent leading to monodispersity. Unlike in
the room temperature synthesis, one obtains
highly crystalline particles.
geometry with Cu-Ka radiation (k ¼ 1:5418 A).
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images
were obtained using a JEOL (JEM3010) trans-
mission electron microscope operating with an
accelerating voltage of 300 kV. A solution of
capped CdS nanocrystals in toluene was evapo-
rated on a holey carbon grid for TEM imaging.
UV–vis absorption spectra of nanocrystals in tol-
uene solvent were recorded using a Hitachi U3400
spectrometer.
3. Results and discussion
2. Experimental
Reactions of Cd(St)2 with sulfur at 493 K in the
presence of tetralin and TOPO resulted in 4 nm
nanocrystals with nearly 100% yield. The presence
of tetralin facilitates the reaction because under
the reaction conditions, it reacts with sulfur and
produces H2S in-situ which reacts with Cd(St)2 to
give the desired phase. In the process, tetralin is
converted to naphthalene which is the more stable
compound. When the CdS particles are capped
with dodecanethiol, we obtain two different sizes
of nanocrystals. The smaller, 5 nm nanocrystals
remain in solution while 10 nanocrystals are
insoluble.
Cadmium stearate [Cd(St)2], prepared by the
addition of a Cd(CH3COO)2 solution to an
aqueous solution of sodium stearate at 363 K,
was used as the Cd source. The stearate was
washed thoroughly with hot water and dried. The
powder XRD pattern and the FT-IR spectrum
confirmed that the sample was free from unre-
acted stearic acid. In a typical reaction for the
preparation of dodecanethiol-capped CdS nano-
crystals, 0.46 g (0.68 mmol) of Cd(St)2 was mixed
with 0.022 g (0.68 mmol) of sulfur, 0.1 g of tetr-
alin (0.75 mmol) and 0.66 g (3.3 mmol) dodeca-
nethiol in 45 ml toluene. The reactants were
sealed in a stainless steel 70 ml teflon-lined auto-
clave and placed in an air oven which was pre-
heated to 493 K for 12h. After the reaction was
complete, the autoclave was taken out of the oven
and allowed to cool to room temperature. The
reaction mixture, upon centrifugation, gives a
yellow solid along with a yellow centrifugate. The
centrifugate contains the soluble smaller nano-
crystals which can be precipitated out using a
polar solvent, isopropyl alcohol. This was reso-
lubulized in toluene and reprecipitated twice be-
fore further characterization. The precipitate
contains the bigger nanocrystals which was wa-
shed thoroughly with toluene. A similar proce-
dure was followed in case of TOPO-capped CdS
nanocrystals, except instead of thiol, 0.10 g of
TOPO was used.
Powder XRD patterns of the various nano-
crystals are shown in Fig. 1. The peaks are con-
siderably broadened, indicating small size. Fig. 1a
represents the PXRD pattern of the TOPO-cap-
ped CdS nanocrystals. The pattern can be in-
ꢀ
dexed to a cubic (a ¼ 5:810 A) zinc blende
structure rather than the wurtzite structure. The
particle size estimated from X-ray broadening is
4 nm. To confirm the space group, a PXRD
pattern was simulated using the DIFFaX pro-
gram [16] wherein 4 ꢀ 4 nm2 slabs of hexagonal
CdS were stacked in an fcc arrangement. The
simulated pattern in Fig. 1d compares well with
the experimental pattern with comparable line
broadening. The PXRD patterns of the soluble
and the insoluble fractions of the CdS nanocrys-
tals obtained using dodecanethiol are shown in
Figs. 1b and c, respectively. From the peak
broadening the average size of the soluble nano-
crystals is estimated to be 5 nm and that of the
precipitated ones to be 10 nm.
All the samples were characterized by powder
X-ray diffraction using a Siemens5005 diffrac-
tometer employing the reflection Bragg–Brentano