Protonation of Me3Si-Substituted C-C Multiple Bonds
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 16, 1996 3839
whose product concentrations were substantially greater than the
solutions extracted, thus facilitating the NMR analysis.
Kinetics. Reaction rates were determined spectroscopically by
monitoring the decrease in alkene or acetylene absorbance at 200-
2
05 nm. Measurements were made with Cary 118 and 2200 spec-
trometers whose cell compartments were thermostated at 25.0 ( 0.05
C. Portions (3.0 mL) of aqueous acids contained in cuvettes were
°
first allowed to come to temperature equilibrium with the spectrometer
cell compartments, and reactions were then initated by adding 5.0-µL
aliquots of stock solutions of substrates dissolved in acetonitrile to these
acid solutions; final substrate concentrations in the reaction mixtures
-
4
were ca. 10 M. Absorbance decreases were followed for several
half-lives. The data conformed to the first-order rate law well, and
first-order rate constants were obtained by nonlinear least squares fitting
of exponential functions. Acid concentrations were determined by
titration of weighed samples.
Results
Figure 1. Cox-Yates plot for the protonation of 1-(trimethylsilyl)-
1
-propyne in aqueous perchloric acid at 25 °C.
Product analyses were conducted for the reaction of 1-(tri-
methylsilyl)cyclohexene and 1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-hexyne with
aqueous perchloric acid at acid concentrations near the midpoints
of the ranges used for kinetic measurements (13.8 and 27.4 wt
Table 1. Summary of Rate Data for the Protonation of
Cyclohexene, Propyne, 1-Hexyne, and Their Trimethylsilyl
Derivatives in Aqueous Solution at 25 °C
%
, respectively). Proton and carbon-13 NMR spectra of the
H+/M- s-1
1
ma
+/k
+
D
substrate
cyclohexene
-(trimethylsilyl)cyclohexene
propyne
-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne
1-hexyne
k
k
H
spent reaction mixtures showed cyclohexene to be the only
product formed from the cyclohexene substrate and 1-hexyne
to be the only product formed from the hexyne substrate.
Elimination of the trimethylsilyl moiety from the carbocations
formed in these olefin and acetylene protonation reactions thus
occurs more rapidly than capture of the cations by solvent. This
-
-
8
1.73 × 10
2.10 × 10
6.11 × 10
3.32 × 10
1.37 × 10
7.78 × 10
1.50
1.54
1.13
1.45
1.02
1.26
4
1
2.25
1.55
1.28
-10
-5
1
-
-
9
5
1
-(trimethylsilyl)-1-hexyne
is consistent with results obtained in the protonation of
a
Cox-Yates correlation slope.
7
(phenyltrimethylsilyl)acetylene and the solvolysis of 2-(tri-
4
methylsilyl)cyclohexyl derivatives, as well as with the general
propensity of â-trimethylsilyl cations to lose their trimethylsilyl
groups.
Rates of protonation of the presently studied alkenes and
alkynes were measured in moderately concentrated aqueous
perchloric acid solutions. For each substrate, duplicate or
triplicate determinations were made at each of 5-6 acid
concentrations. The data so obtained are summarized in Table
examined conformed to this relationship well; an example is
shown in Figure 1. The values of kH obtained in this way are
+
9
listed in Table 1.
Some rate constants were also determined for the silyl-
substituted substrates in solutions of DClO4 in D2O. Replicate
measurements were made for each substrate at a single acid
concentration in the concentration range used for the measure-
10
ments in H2O solution; these data are summarized in Table S2.
1
0
S1.
Kinetic isotope effects were evaluated from the results obtained
by comparison with H2O rate constants at the same acid
concentration; the latter were obtained by interpolation of the
Cox-Yates correlations. The results are listed in Table 1.
Rates of protonation of cyclohexene in aqueous perchloric
As is usual for the protonation of carbon-carbon double and
triple bonds, rates of reaction of the present substrates increased
with increasing acidity of the medium more rapidly than in direct
proportion to acid concentration, and an acidity function was
1
1
therefore used to analyze the data. The Cox-Yates method
14
acid have been measured before, and the dilute-solution
12
using the X0 function appears to be the best procedure currently
avialable for this purpose.13 The data were fitted using the
expression shown in eq 6, where kH+ is the bimolecular
hydronium ion rate constant that applies in dilute solution and
-8
-1
+
hydronium ion rate constant reported, kH ) 4.43 × 10
M
-1
+
s , though broadly consistent with our result, kH ) 1.73 ×
-8
-1 -1
1
0
M
s , is not in good numerical agreement with it. In
the previous study, however, extrapolation to dilute solution was
performed using the H0 acidity function, which is not an
appropriate acidity scale for this reaction. Fortunately, the raw
+
log (kobs/[H ]) ) log kH
+
+ mX0
(6)
data were also published in this earlier report, and reanalysis
+
8
m is a slope parameter. The data obtained for all six substrates
of that using the Cox-Yates method gives k
) 1.67 × 10
H
-1 -1
M
s , in very good agreement with the presently determined
value.
Rates of protonation of propyne and 1-hexyne were also
(9) Olah, G. A.; Berrier, A. L.; Field, L. D.; Prakash, G. K. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1349-1355. Prakash, G. K. S.; Reddy, V. K.; Rasul,
G.; Casanova, J.; Olah, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3076-3078.
Siehl, H.-U.; Kaufmann, F.-P.; Apeloig, Y.; Braude, V.; Danovich, D.;
Berndt, A.; Stamatis, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1479-
15
determined before, but the previous measurements were made
in sulfuric acid rather than the perchloric acid used here.
Sulfuric acid solutions at the concentrations employed contain
appreciable quantities of undissociated bisulfate ion, which
functions as an efficient general acid proton donor and makes
rates of protonation in this medium considerably faster than
1
4
1
1
482. Siehl, H.-U.; Kaufmann, F.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4937-
939. Siehl, H.-U.; Kaufmann, F.-P.; Hori, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
14, 9343-9349. Lew, C. S. Q.; McClelland, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
993, 115, 11516-11520. Lew, C. S. Q.; McClelland, R. A.; Johnston, L.
J.; Schepp, N. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 395-397.
10) Supporting information; see paragraph at the end of this paper
regarding availability.
(
(
11) (a) Cox, R. A.; Yates, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3861-
(14) Chwang, W. K.; Nowlan, V. J.; Tidwell, T. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 7233-7238.
(15) Cramer, P.; Tidwell, T. T. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2683-2686.
Allen, A. D.; Chiang, Y.; Kresge, A. J.; Tidwell, T. T. J. Org. Chem. 1982,
47, 775-779.
3
867. (b) Cox, R. A. Acct. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 27-31.
(
(
12) Cox, R. A.; Yates, K. Can. J. Chem. 1981, 59, 2116-2124.
13) Kresge, A. J.; Chen, H. J.; Capen, G. L.; Powell, M F. Can. J. Chem.
1
983, 61, 249-256.