J Nat Med (2013) 67:350–358
357
1014, 817. UV kmax (MeOH) nm (log e): 252 (4.27), 210
(4.04). 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) d: 7.88 (2H, d,
J = 8.4 Hz, H-200 and 600), 7.70 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-300
and 500), 5.43 (1H, d, J = 16.8 Hz, H-800a), 5.37 (1H, d,
J = 16.8 Hz, H-800b), 4.03 (1H, tt, J = 7.6, 5.1 Hz, C-3),
2.65 (1H, dd, J = 15.0, 5.1 Hz, H-2a), 2.65 (1H, dd,
J = 15.0, 7.6 Hz, H-2b), 1.52 (2H, m, H2-4), 1.34 (2H, m,
H2-5), 1.33 (2H, m, H2-6), 1.32 (2H, m, H-7), 0.90 (3H, t,
J = 7.1 Hz, H-8); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100 MHz) d: 193.9
(C-700), 172.7 (C-1), 134.5 (C-100), 133.3 (C-300 and 500),
130.6 (C-200 and 600), 129.8 (C-400), 69.3 (C-3), 67.3 (C-700),
43.1 (C-2), 37.9 (C-4), 32.8 (C-6), 26.2 (C-5), 23.6 (C-7),
14.3 (C-8); HR-ESI–MS (positive-ion mode) m/z: 379.0526
[M?Na]? (calcd for C16H21O4Na79Br: 379.0515) and
381.0488 [M?Na]? (calcd for C16H21O4Na81Br: 381.0494).
J = 9.0 Hz, H-200 and 600), 7.63 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-300
and 500), 7.53–7.56 (2H, m, MTPA aromatic protons), 7.37–
7.39 (3H, m, MTPA aromatic protons), 5.52 (1H, tt,
J = 7.8, 5.4 Hz, H-3), 5.19 (1H, d, J = 16.4 Hz, H-800a),
5.13 (1H, d, J = 16.4 Hz, H-800b), 3.55 (3H, q, J = 1 Hz,
–OCH3), 2.83 (1H, dd, J = 16.2, 7.8 Hz, H-2a), 2.76 (1H,
dd, J = 16.2, 5.4 Hz, H-2b), 1.74–1.79 (2H, m, H-4), 1.34
(2H, m, H-6), 1.32 (2H, m, H-5), 1.30 (2H, m, H-7), 0.89
(3H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, H-8); HR-ESI–MS (positive-ion mode)
m/z: 595.0914 [M?Na]? (calcd for C26H28O6F3Na79Br:
595.0913) and 597.0882 [M?Na]? (calcd for C26H28O6F3-
Na81Br: 597.0893).
Methylation of 4
23
D-glucose: ½aꢁD ?34.1 (c 0.25, H2O, 24 h after being dis-
Five milligrams of 4 was dissolved in 1 mL MeOH and
methylated with an excess amount of trimethylsilyl
solved in H2O).
diazomethane. On removal of the solvent, 5.1 mg 4e (= 5)
26
was obtained. Compound 4e: Amorphous powder, ½aꢁD
-
Preparation of (R)-ester (4c) and (S)-MTPA ester (4d)
from 4b
36.9 (c 0.34, MeOH); NMR: identical with those of 5; HR-
ESI–MS (positive-ion mode) m/z: 359.1675 [M?Na]?
(calcd for C15H28O8Na: 359.1676).
A solution of 4b (1.0 mg) in 1 mL dehydrated CH2Cl2 was
reacted with (R)-MTPA (10.2 mg) in the presence
of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydro-
chloride (EDC) (9.5 mg) and N,N-dimethyl-4-aminopyri-
dine (4-DMAP) (5.1 mg), and the mixture was then stirred
occasionally at 40 °C for 18 h. After the addition of 1 mL
CH2Cl2, the solution was washed with H2O (1 mL), 5 %
HCl (1 mL), NaHCO3-saturated H2O, and brine (1 mL),
successively. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and
then evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was
purified by preparative TLC [silica gel (0.25 mm thick-
ness); the residue being applied for 18 cm, developed with
CHCl3-(CH3)2CO (20:1) for 9 cm, and then eluted with
CHCl3–MeOH (5:1)] to furnish an ester, 4b (0.5 mg).
Through a similar procedure, 4c (0.5 mg) was prepared
from 4a (1.0 mg) using (S)-MTPA (17.4 mg), EDC
(9.4 mg), and 4-DMAP (6.6 mg). Compound 4c: Amor-
phous powder, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d: 7.75 (2H, d,
J = 9.0 Hz, H-200 and 600), 7.64 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-300
and 500), 7.53–7.56 (2H, m, MTPA aromatic protons), 7.37–
7.39 (3H, m, MTPA aromatic protons), 5.53 (1H, tt,
J = 7.8, 5.4 Hz, H-3), 5.26 (1H, d, J = 16.4 Hz, H-800b),
5.31 (1H, d, J = 16.4 Hz, H-800a), 3.55 (3H, q, J = 1 Hz,
–OCH3), 2.89 (1H, dd, J = 16.2, 7.8 Hz, H-2a), 2.79 (1H,
dd, J = 16.2, 5.4 Hz, H-2b), 1.67–1.73 (2H, m, H2-4), 1.31
(2H, m, H2-6), 1.28 (2H, m, H2-5), 1.27 (2H, m, H2-7),
0.86 (3H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, H-8); HR-ESI–MS (positive-ion
mode) m/z: 595.0935 [M?Na]? (calcd for C26H28O6F3-
Na79Br: 595.0913) and 597.0876 [M?Na]? (calcd for
C26H28O6F3Na81Br: 597.0893). Compound 4d: Amor-
phous powder, 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d: 7.73 (2H, d,
Antioxidant activity with a DPPH radical-scavenging
system
The antioxidant activity was evaluated using a DPPH
radical-scavenging system. In a 96-well plate, 2 lL-ali-
quots of the DMSO solution of the compounds were diluted
with 98 lL MeOH in triplicate. A 100 lL-aliquot of a
methanolic solution of DPPH was added to each well to
give a final concentration of 100 lM. The compounds were
tested at final concentrations of 50, 30, 10 and 5 lM. Each
mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at room
temperature, followed by measurement of the absorbance
at 515 nm using a Molecular Devices Versamax tunable
microplate reader. DMSO was used as a negative control
and Trolox as a positive control. Radical-scavenging
activity was expressed as the inhibition percentage and was
calculated using the following formula:
% Inhibition ¼ ½ðAcontrol ꢂ AtestÞ = Acontrolꢁ ꢃ 100
where Acontrol is the absorbance of the control (DMSO) and
Atest the absorbance of a test compounds.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for access to the
superconducting NMR instrument (JEOL JNM a-400) at the Ana-
lytical Center of Molecular Medicine of the Hiroshima University
Faculty of Medicine, and an Applied Biosystem QSTAR XL system
ESI (Nano Spray)-MS at the Analysis Center of Life Science of the
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University. This
work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Thanks are also due to
123