G Model
CARP-8751; No. of Pages9
ARTICLE IN PRESS
C. Goncalves et al. / Carbohydrate Polymers xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
Results for the preparation of halogenated cellulose derivatives.
.
Entry
Reagent
Number of eq.,
addition mode
Sample
DS
Weight
gain
Yield (isolated
product)
Comments
1
2
3
4
1,3-Dibromopropane
12 eq., one portion
12 eq., one portion
12 eq., three
2a
2b
2c
2c
–
–
–
2.76
–
–
–
–
10%
35%
Elimination reaction
Elimination reaction
Insoluble
1-Bromo-4-(2-bromoethyl)benzene
1-Bromo-4-(bromomethyl)benzene
1-Bromo-4-(bromomethyl)benzene
−63%
38%
Soluble in THF/CDCl3
portions
12 eq., dropwise
5
1-Bromo-4-(bromomethyl)benzenea
2c
2.78
130%
60%
Soluble in THF/CDCl3
a
Reaction time: 24 h.
Compound 3a was obtained as
a
grey powder (330 mg,
3. Results and discussion
DG = 2.18), using (4-ethylphenyl)boronic acid.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 1.25
( CH2 CH3), 2.68
(
CH2 CH3), 3.15 (H-5), 3.24 (H-2), 3.36 (H-3), 3.63 (H-6),
3.90 (H-4), 4.13, 4.36 (H-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 4.38 (H-1), 4.59, 5.00 (H-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ),
6.88–7.69 (H Ar).
The first step of this study was the preparation of a halogenated
cellulose derivative. Cellulose was thus solubilized in N,N-dimethyl
acetamide (DMA)/LiCl in the presence of sodium hydroxide and 1,3-
dibromopropane was added (Table 1, entry 1) (Sachinvala et al.,
mation of the desired halogenated cellulose 2a, but the presence
of allyl-cellulose, issued from an elimination reaction of a HBr
molecule in this basic medium, was detected. The same behaviour
was observed on 1-bromo-4-(2-bromoethyl)benzene, leading to
the formation of 1-allyl-4-bromobenzene (Table 1, entry 2). 1-
Bromo-4-(bromomethyl)benzene was then chosen (Table 1, entry
3) as no elimination can occur on this reagent. Indeed, the desired
halogenated cellulose 2c was obtained but with a DS too low to be
soluble in common solvents, such as CDCl3 (which prevented the
DS to be determined by NMR). It seems highly likely that cellulose
ethers that have even lower DS are soluble in the aqueous phase
and are thus lost during the extraction process, accounting for the
negative weight gain.
The brominated reagent was then added in three portions
instead of one at the beginning of the reaction, which led to the for-
thanks to the addition of a few drops of d1-TFA in the NMR tube
in order to displace downfield the NMR signals of exchangeable
protons and water (Ross & Lowe, 2000). An excellent yield of 60%
was then obtained when 1-bromo-4-(bromomethyl)benzene was
added dropwise over the course of 24 h (Table 1, entry 5), which
seems to show the poor stability of this reactant in our reaction
conditions. Full structure characterization of 2c was carried out at
500 MHz using one-, two-dimensional homo- and 1H–13C hetero-
correlated techniques. Experiments were run in CDCl3 as d6-DMSO
caused spectral line broadening and required long accumulation
time because of the poor solubility of 2c in this solvent. Thanks to
the 1H/1H COSY and 1H/13C HSQC NMR analyses (Fig. 4), the 1H
and 13C signals of the modified AGU can be respectively assigned
as follows (Fig. 3): 3.13 ppm (H-5), 3.23 ppm (H-2), 3.29 ppm (H-
3), 3.60 ppm (H-6), 3.84 ppm (H-4), 4.34 ppm (H-1) and 68.1 ppm
(C-6), 75.0 ppm (C-5), 77.0 ppm (C-4), 81.8 ppm (C-2), 83.5 ppm (C-
3), 102.7 ppm (C-1). The signals for H-7 and H-7ꢀ were respectively
found at 4.14 and 3.38 ppm, while the protons in position 7ꢀꢀ are
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 15.6
(
CH2 CH3), 28.5
(
CH2 CH3), 68.0 (C-6), 72.1, 72.8, 74.5 (C-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 75.0 (C-
5), 77.1 (C-4), 81.6 (C-2), 83.5 (C-3), 102.7 (C-1), 121.5 (Cq-Ar),
126.8, 126.9, 128.2, 129.0, 129.3, 131.1, 131.4 (C Ar), 136.4, 137.7,
138.4, 140.1, 140.6, 143.1, 143.6 (Cq-Ar).
FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3434 vOH (weak), 3024, 2961, 2926, 2868
vC H, 1498 vC C, 1458, 1400 vC H, 1152–1037 vC
vC Br.
O C, 810
3a is soluble in THF and chloroform.
Compound 3b was obtained as
a grey powder (326 mg,
DG = 1.76), using (4-butylphenyl)boronic acid.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 0.89 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3),
1.41 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 1.61 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 2.64
(
CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 3.11 (H-5), 3.21 (H-2), 3.30 (H-3), 3.60 (H-
6), 3.88 (H-4), 4.12 (H-7), 4.33 (H-1), 4.55 (H-7ꢀꢀa), 4.63 (H-7ꢀ), 4.99
(H-7ꢀꢀb), 6.77–7.70 (H Ar).
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 14.3 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3),
22.8 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 32.0 ( CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 37.3
(
CH2 CH2 CH2 CH3), 68.2 (C-6), 72.3 (C-7), 74.3 (C-7ꢀ), 74.7 (C-
7ꢀꢀ), 75.1 (C-5), 76.9 (C-4), 81.8 (C-2), 83.6 (C-3), 102.7 (C-1), 121.2,
121.5 (Cq-Ar), 129.1, 129.2, 129.3, 129.4, 129.7, 131.3, 131.4, 131.5,
131.6, 131.7, 131.8 (C Ar), 136.8, 137.0, 137.1, 138.3 (Cq-Ar).
FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3424 vOH (weak), 2924, 2867 vC H, 1488
vC C, 1458, 1358 vC H, 1174–970 vC
O
C, 802 vC Br.
3b is soluble in THF and chloroform.
Compound 3c was obtained as
a
grey powder (330 mg,
DG = 1.20), using (4-(ethoxycarbonyl)phenyl)boronic acid.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 1.34 ( CH2 CH3), 3.06 (H-5), 3.17
(H-2), 3.49 (H-3), 3.51 (H-6), 3.77 (H-4), 4.05 (H-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 4.27 (H-
1), 4.33 ( CH2 CH3), 4.43 (H-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 4.64 (H-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 6.71–8.15
(H Ar).
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): ı = 14.4
( CH2 CH3), 61.1
(
CH CH3), 69.9 (C-6), 72.2, 74.3, 74.6 (C-7/7ꢀ/7ꢀꢀ), 75.2 (C-5),
76.9 (C-4), 81.8 (C-2), 83.6 (C-3), 102.7 (C-1), 121.8 (Cq-Ar), 126.9,
127.2, 128.3, 129.0, 129.1, 129.3, 130.0, 130.2, 131.2, 131.4, 131.5
(C Ar), 143.9, 144.3, 144.9, 166.6 (Cq-Ar).
FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3435 vOH (weak), 2867 vC H, 1710 vC O,
1487 vC C, 1397, 1365 vC H, 1183–950 vC
3c is soluble in THF and chloroform.
O C, 803 vC Br.
Please cite this article in press as: Goncalves, C., et al. Synthesis of new cellulose ethers using Suzuki–Miyaura reactions. Carbohydrate