Octylphenol Polyethoxylate-degrading Bacteria in Paddy Fields
1793
=
disperse polyethylene glycol units averaging n 10.
by silica gel column chromatography with
n
-hexane-
All other reagents, including high-performance
ethyl acetate (20:1) as the eluent to aŠord pure ethyl
liquid chromatographic grade
n
-hexane, ethanol,
6-[
ahexanoate in an 84.4
ethyl 6-[ -(1 ,1 ,3 ,3
dioxahexanoate (11.0 g 30 ml of dry THF) was
p
-(1
?
,1
?
,3
?
,3
?
-tetramethyl-butyl)phenyl]-3,6-diox-
yield (11.3 g). A solution of
? ? ? ?-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-3,6-
isopropanol, methanol and ethyl acetate were pur-
chased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka,
Japan).
z
p
W
added to a suspension of LiAlH4 (1.5 g 50 ml of dry
W
Preparation of the standard degradation products.
9
THF) at below 5 C while stirring. After this addi-
a) 2-[
p
-(1
?
,1
?
,3
?
,3?
-tetramethylbutyl)phenoxy]etha-
tion, the mixture was stirred at room temperature for
4 hrs, before ethyl acetate (20 ml) was added drop-
nol (OP1EO): A solution of sodium octylphenoxide
(22.8 g) and ethyl bromoacetate (17.0 g) in dry
wise to the reaction mixture at below 10
pose excess LiAlH4. After the usual workup, crude 6-
-(1 ,1 ,3 ,3 -tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-3,6-dioxa-
9C to decom-
DMSO (80 ml) was stirred overnight at 259C. After
the reaction had been completed, 200 ml of water was
added to the reaction mixture, and the mixture was
[
p
? ? ? ?
hexanol (OP2EO) was obtained as a pale yellow liq-
uid. This product was puriˆed by silica gel column
extracted with ether (200 ml
×
3). The ethereal layer
was washed twice with water and dried over anhy-
drous sodium sulfate. The ethereal layer was evapo-
rated in vacuo to give a crude product. This product
was puriˆed by silica gel column chromatography
chromatography with
as an the eluent to aŠord pure 6-[
methylbutyl)phenyl]-3,6-diox-ahexanol (OP2EO) in
a 78.3 (CDCl3): 0.71
yield (7.5 g). 1H-NMR
(CH3 2, s), 1.70 (CH2, s),
n
-hexane-ethyl acetate (15:1)
p
-(1?,1?,3?,3?-tetra-
z
d
with
aŠord ethyl
yacetate as a pale yellow liquid (22.8 g; 78.1
n
-hexane-ethyl acetate (15:1) as the eluent to
- (1 ,1 ,3 ,3 -tetramethylbutyl)phenox-
yield).
-tetramethyl-
3, s), 1.34 (CH3
× ×
×
=
9.0 Hz), 7.29
p
?
?
?
?
3.80–4.21(CH2 4, m), 6.83 (2H, d,
J
9.0 Hz). 13C-NMR
d (CDCl3): 31.6 (3C),
=
z
(2H, d,
J
A solution of this ethyl
p
-(1
?
,1
?
,3
?
,3
?
31.7 (2C), 32.2, 37.9, 56.9, 61.7, 67.2, 69.7, 72.5,
butyl)phenoxy-acetate (22.4 g 100 ml of dry THF)
113.7(2C), 127.0(2C), 142.5, 156.2. UV
l
max
W
was added dropwise to a suspension of LiAlH4 (1.83
(EtOH) nm (
e
): 283 (1,145), 277 (1,381), 225 (9,457).
): 294 (M+, 8), 223
=
g 50 ml of dry THF) below 5
9
C while stirring. After
GCMS: tR 10.53 min; m z (
z
W
W
this addition, the mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 3 hrs. After the reaction had been com-
pleted, ethyl acetate (20 ml) was added dropwise to
(100), 135 (47).
c) 9-[ p-(1?,1?,3?,3?-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-
3,6,9-trioxanonanol (OP3EO): OP3EO was synthe-
sized from OP2EO by a method similar to that for
the reaction mixture at below 10
excess LiAlH4. After the usual workup, crude
2-[ -(1 ,1 ,3 ,3 -tetramethylbutyl)phenoxy]ethanol
9
C to decompose
OP2EO in an 82.3
z
yield (5.1 g). 1H-NMR
d
× ×
(CDCl3): 0.71 (CH3 3, s), 1.34 (CH3 2, s), 1.70
p
?
?
?
?
(OP1EO) was obtained as a pale yellow liquid. The
product was puriˆed by silica gel column chro-
(CH2, s), 3.61–4.25 (CH2
×
6, m), 6.83 (2H, d,
J 9.0
=
9.0 Hz). 13C-NMR
d (CDCl3):
=
Hz), 7.29 (2H, d,
J
matography with
n
-hexane-ethyl acetate (20:1) as the
-(1 ,1 ,3 ,3 -tetramethyl-
31.6 (3C), 31.7 (2C), 32.2, 37.9, 56.9, 61.7, 67.2,
69.8, 70.3, 70.7, 72.5, 113.7 (2C), 126.9 (2C), 142.4,
eluent to aŠord pure 2-[
p
? ? ? ?
butyl)phenoxy]-ethanol (OP1EO, 16.7 g, 87.2
z
156.2. UV
(1,210), 225 (8,324). GCMS: tR
): 338 (M+, 6), 267 (100), 135 (25)
l
max (EtOH) nm (
e
): 283 (1,038), 277
1
yield). H-NMR
d
(CDCl3): 0.71 (CH3
×
3, s), 1.34
=
10.53 min; m z
W
×
×
(CH3 2, s), 1.70 (CH2, s), 3.80–4.22(CH2 2, m),
(z
6.84 (2H, d,
13C-NMR
(CDCl3): 31.6(3C), 31.7(2C), 32.2, 37.7,
56.8, 60.0, 69.0, 113.7(2C), 127.0(2C), 142.5, 156.2.
J 9.0 Hz), 7.28 (2H, d, J 9.0 Hz).
= =
1
d
Instrumental analyses. 13C- and H-NMR spectra
were recorded by a JEOL AL400 instrument, using
tetramethylsilane as an internal standard.
The degradation process was tracked by an
IATROSCAN TH-10 instrument (Iatron Laborato-
ries) with Chromarod-S III.
UV lmax (EtOH) nm (e): 283 (1,350), 277 (1,580),
=
225 (11,080). GCMS: tR 9.04 min; m z (
z): 250
W
(M+, 4), 179 (100), 135 (39).
b) 6-[ p-(1?,1?,3?,3?-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]3,6-
dioxahexanol (OP2EO): A solution of OP1EO (10 g
30 ml of dry THF) was added dropwise to a suspen-
sion of sodium hydride (60 in oil: 2.3 g 50 ml of
GCMS analyses were performed by a Perkin Elmer
GCMS Q-910 instrument equipped with a Supelco
SPBTM1 column (30 m length, 0.32 mm diameter) au-
tomatic injector.
HPLC analyses were performed by a Shimadzu
LC-6A instrument equipped with a Shodex MS pak
GF-310 4E column (4.6 250 mm).
×
W
z
W
dry THF) while stirring at room temperature. The
evolution of hydrogen ceased after 1 hr of stirring,
and an ethyl bromoacetate solution (7.0 g 30 ml of
W
dry THF) was then added dropwise to the reaction
mixture at 10
9
C. The reaction mixture was stirred at
PCR ampliˆcation was carried out with a TP-500
DNA thermal cycler (Takara Biochemicals).
room temperature for 1 hr and then re‰uxed for 3
hrs. After the usual workup, crude ethyl 6-[
(1 ,1 ,3 ,3 -tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-3,6-dioxahex-
anoate was obtained. The crude product was puriˆed
p
-
?
?
?
?
Soil samples. The soil samples were collected in
April 2000 from 35 diŠerent paddy ˆelds in West