the conversion of o-bis(ethynyl)benzene into naphthalene,
is one of the potential reactions for the synthesis of
π-extended aromatic compounds. Although to our best
Scheme 2. Syntheses of 2a and 2b
7
knowledge only a few examples of the Bergman cyclo-
8
aromatization on chalcogenophenes have been reported, we
thought that the reaction was worth considering in the
synthesis of highly extended heteroarenes and planned to
examine the Bergman double cyclization on benzo[1,2-b:
4
,5-b′]dichalcogenophenes (1, Scheme 1),9 which gives
Scheme 1. Consecutive Double Cyclization Approach to 2
in the Larock protocol to form benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dichal-
1
2
cogenophene derivatives (5). The trimethylsilyl groups on
were substituted with iodine to give tetraiodo compounds
6), and these were readily converted into tetrakis(trimeth-
5
(
ylsilylethynyl) derivatives (7) by the Sonogashira coupling
reaction. Formation of the outermost benzene rings of 2 was
achieved in reasonable yields with the Bergman cycloaro-
matization, using in situ generated sodium telluride as
1
3
reagent. Under the reaction conditions of the final step,
desilylation was concomitantly induced to give 2 directly.
Both sulfur (2a) and selenium (2b) analogues were stable
pale yellow solids that were well-characterized by spectro-
scopic and combustion elemental analyses. Single-crystal
X-ray analyses enabled unquestionable characterization of
these highly extended heterocycles (vide infra).
benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]bis[b]benzochalcogenophenes (2)10 pos-
sessing five aromatic rings fused in a linear fashion. In this
approach, the tetraethynyl derivative of 1 is a rational
precursor. Since various derivatives of 1 are readily synthe-
sized by double electrophilic heterocyclization of the central
9
Cyclic voltammetry of 2 showed irreversible oxidation
waves (for charts, see Figure S1 in the Supporting Informa-
tion). The oxidation peaks of 2a and 2b were found at +1.15
benzene core, the combination of these two cyclization
protocols can provide a unique and efficient synthetic
approach to 2 (five aromatic rings) from a benzene derivative
+
and +0.89 V (vs Fc/Fc ). The potential of 2a was much
(one aromatic ring) via 1 (three aromatic rings). We here
higher than that of 1a (+0.95 V), whereas the potential of
report the efficient synthesis of 2 by this approach, their
properties and crystal structures, and the preliminary results
of FET characteristics of their evaporated thin films.
Scheme 2 shows the synthetic route to 2. Readily available
2
b was comparable to that of 1b (+0.89 V). On the premise
+
that the Fc/Fc energy level is 4.8 eV below the vacuum
1
4
level, HOMO levels of 2a and 2b were estimated by using
oxidation onsets (+0.96 V for 2a and +0.76 V for 2b) 5.8
and 5.6 eV below the vacuum level, respectively. These
values are consistent with the HOMO levels that were
calculated by using DFT methods (5.57 eV for 2a and 5.41
eV for 2b). It should be noted that the HOMO levels of 2
were similar to or slightly lower than those of 1, even though
the former have a more extended π-system than the latter,
indicating that the electronic structures of 2 are different from
those of 1.
11
1
,4-dibromo-2,5-bis(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene (3) was
converted into 1,4-bis(methylthio)- or 1,4-bis(methylseleno)-
,5-bis(trimethylsilylethynyl)benzene (4), which was utilized
2
(6) (a) Okamoto, T.; Kudoh, K.; Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 5301-5304. (b) Okamoto, T.; Kudoh, K.; Wakamiya, A.;
Yamaguchi, S. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 548-556.
(
7) (a) Bergman, R. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1973, 6, 25-53. (b) For an
excellent review, see: Grissom, J. W.; Gunawardena, G. U.; Klingberg,
D.; Huang, D. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6453-53. (c) Bowles, D. M.; Anthony,
J. E. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 85-87.
(8) Lo, C.-Y.; Kumar, M. P.; Chang, H.-K.; Lush, S.-F.; Liu, R.-S. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10482-10487.
9) Takimiya, K.; Konda, Y.; Ebata, H.; Niihara, N.; Otsubo, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 10569-10571.
10) The synthesis of 2a with conventional synthetic strategies has been
(12) (a) Yue, D.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1905-1909.
(b) Kesharwani, T.; Worlikar, S. A.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
71, 2307-2312.
(13) (a) Tsuchiya, T.; Sashida, H.; Kurahashi, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1991, 802. (b) Landis, C. A.; Payne, M. M.; Eaton, D. L.;
Anthony, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1338-1339.
(14) (a) Br e´ das, J.-L.; Silbey, R.; Boudreaux, D. S.; Chance, R. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6555-6559. (b) Pommerehne, J.; Vestweber,
H.; Guss, W.; Mark, R. F.; B a¨ ssler, H.; Porsch, M.; Daub, J. AdV. Mater.
1995, 7, 551-554.
(
(
reported: (a) Ahmed, M.; Ashby, J.; Ayad, M.; Meth-Cohn, O. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 1099-1102. (b) Rao, D. S.; Tilak, B. D. J. Sci.
Ind. Res. 1958, 17B, 260-266. (c) Pandya, L. J.; Pillai, G. N.; Tilak, B. D.
J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1959, 18B, 198-202.
(11) Goldfinger, M. B.; Crawford, K. B.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 4578-4593.
4500
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 22, 2007