B. K. Feld, G. A. Weiss / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1665–1667
1667
Khorana procedure for morpholidate synthesis caused
decomposition of 6, and no product could be detected.
However, a simple change of the solvent system from
H O/t-butanol to H O/i-butanol led to quantitative for-
In summary, we present a significantly faster method for
the synthesis of farnesyl monophosphate, which can eas-
ily be extended to the synthesis of other allyl monophos-
phates. We also evaluated and optimized two different
monophosphate coupling methods for the formation
2
2
mation of the desired morpholidate. This new solvent
system led to better yields and cleaner products in the
morpholidate formation for phosphates 4–6 (Table 2).
This improvement is likely due to the fact that i-butanol
and water are only slightly miscible. Therefore, the
phosphate likely remains mainly in the aqueous phase
and the morpholine in the organic phase. This separa-
tion diminishes hydrolysis of the phosphate by the
strongly basic morpholine. Morpholidate formation of
phosphates 3 and 7 could not be achieved using either
method. Therefore, diphosphate 11 remains inaccessible
through the morpholidate method.
1
2
of P -farnesyl-P -substituted diphosphates. Though the
use of morpholidate intermediate compounds can result
in better yields for diphosphates with imidazole- or
CDI-sensitive functionalities, it is less convenient than
the CDI-catalyzed coupling reactions, requiring two
separate reaction steps in place of one. Furthermore,
as demonstrated here, a broader variety of diphosphates
are accessible via CDI coupling, including compounds
inaccessible via the morpholidate route, such as diphos-
phate 11. The reactions presented in this publication
demonstrate that the CDI-based reaction conditions
can be used in the presence of esters, Michael acceptors,
and unprotected amines.
The synthesis of diphosphate 10 demonstrates the use-
fulness of the tetrazole-catalyzed coupling reaction for
allylic diphosphates. After two days reaction time, the
solvent was evaporated, and diphosphate 10 was isolat-
ed via preparative LC–MS in 55% yield (Scheme 2).
Supporting information
Experimental procedures, NMR, and mass spectral data
for compounds 1–3 and 8–14 are available.
Table 2. Synthesis of phosphomorpholidates by improved conditions
Acknowledgments
a
a
We gratefully acknowledge support by the ACS Petro-
leum Research Fund and the Arnold and Mabel Beck-
man Foundation. We also thank Brett Howard for
preliminary experiments and Dr. John Greaves for the
acquisition of high resolution mass spectral data.
R
Yield
O/t-BuOH)
Yield
(H O/i-BuOH)
(
H
2
2
b
6)
c
(
n.r.
99% (12)
84% (13)
e
d
n.a.
Me (4)
References and notes
e
5)
(
39% (14)
100% (14)
1. Cane, D. E. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 1089.
2
. Brody, E. P.; Gutsche, C. D. Tetrahedron 1977, 33,
23.
3. Cramer, F.; Rittersdorf, W. Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 3015.
7
f
c
c
C
15
H25 (3)
n.r.
n.r.
4
. Warren, C. D.; Jeanloz, R. W. Biochemistry 1972, 11,
2565.
e
c
c
(
7)
n.r.
n.r.
5
. Kanegasaki, S.; Wright, A.; Warren, C. D. Eur. J.
Biochem. 1983, 133, 77.
a
b
c
d
e
f
0
-Morpholine-N,N -dicyclohexylcarboxamidinium salt of morpholidate.
6. Danilov, L. L.; Maltsev, S. D.; Shibaev, V. N.; Kochet-
kov, N. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 88, 203.
7. Ryu, Y.; Scott, A. I. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4713.
8. Davisson, V. J.; Woodside, A. B.; Neal, T. R.; Stremler,
K. E.; Muehlbacher, M.; Poulter, C. D. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 4768.
4
p-Toluidine salt.
No reaction.
Not available.
Free acid.
Ammonium salt.
9
. Davisson et al. report the use of acetonitrile. In the
formation of farnesyl monophosphate, though, we noted
formation of a small amount of bisfarnesyl monophos-
phate. This side reaction was minimized with DMF as the
solvent.
1
1
0. (a) Cramer, F.; Schaller, H.; Staab, H. A. Chem. Ber. 1961,
4, 1612; (b) Schaller, H.; Staab, H. A.; Cramer, F. Chem.
Ber. 1961, 94, 1621.
9
1. Moffatt, J. G.; Khorana, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961,
83, 649.
12. Wittmann, V.; Wong, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2144.
Scheme 2.