4734
L. D. Jennings et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4731–4735
Table 3. Activity comparison in the colon cell line panel
Compound LoVo SW620 DLD1
IC50 (lM) IC50 (lM) IC50 (lM) IC50 (lM)
2. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R. A. Cell 2000, 100, 57.
3. Torrance, C. J.; Agrawal, V.; Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K.
W. Nature Biotechol. 2001, 19, 940.
4. Prendergast, G. C. Nature Biotech. 2001, 19, 919.
5. Levine, A. J. Cell 1997, 88, 323.
6. Stewart, Z. A.; Pietenpol, J. A. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001,
14, 243.
7. Vogelstein, B.; Lane, D.; Levine, A. J. Nature 2000, 408,
307.
8. Stewart, Z. A.; Leach, S. D.; Pietenpol, J. A. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 1999, 19, 205.
9. Waldman, T.; Kinzler, K. W.; Vogelstein, B. Cancer Res.
1995, 55, 5187.
HT29
2
4
0.14
0.08
0.02
0.05
0.11
0.18
0.17
0.19
0.19
0.12
0.03
0.07
0.14
0.24
0.17
0.42
0.29
0.15
0.04
0.09
0.14
0.29
0.18
0.41
0.24
0.18
0.04
0.12
0.15
0.36
0.15
0.42
11
12
13
15
17
19
10. Waldman, T.; Lengaur, C.; Kinzler, K. W.; Vogelstein, B.
Nature 1996, 381, 713.
11. Gopalsamy, A.; Ellingboe, J. W.; Tsou, H.-R.; Zhang, N.;
Wang, D.; Honores, E.; Johnson, S.; Powell, D.; Miranda,
M.; McGinnis, J. P.; Rabindran, S. K. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2005, 5(6), 591.
12. Cruceyra, A.; Gomez Parra, V.; Madronero, R. Anales de
Quimica (1968–1979) 1975, 71, 103, The authors actually
reported the preparation of 2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-
2,3,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-1H-benzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-
4-one (CAS # 37556-33-5) but probably, in fact, synthesized
the tetrahydrothieno pyrimidinone 2.
13. Wang, Y. D.; Johnson, S.; Powell, D.; McGinnis, J.;
Miranda, M.; Rabindran, S. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 3763.
Table 4. Binding of thienopyrimidinone cell proliferation inhibitors to
tubulin in a fluorescence binding assay22
Compound
Kd(apparent)
11
12
16
1.8 lM 0.14
4.0 lM 0.4
1.6 lM 0.26
50 mg/kg (oral dosing, once-daily). Solubility of 11 was
low (4 lg/mL at pH 7.4). The lack of in vivo efficacy
may be on account of the low bioavailability caused
by poor physical properties. However, a pharmacokinet-
ic study on 11 was not done.
14. Gerwald, K.; Schinke, E.; Bottcher, H. Chem. Ber. 1966,
99, 94.
The anti-tumor compound colchicine is known to work
by inhibiting microtubule formation. Colchicine is also
an inhibitor of p21ꢀ/ꢀ cell proliferation (IC50 p21ꢀ/ꢀ
0.02 lM) with approximately 10-fold selectivity for
p21 deficient cells over p21 proficient cells. We were
interested knowing whether or not the thienopyrimidi-
none series killed p21ꢀ/ꢀ cells by the same mechanism.
Using a fluorescence binding assay,22 11 was found to
bind saturably to the tubulin dimer with a one-to-one
stoichiometry and showed a Kd(apparent) of 1.8 lM. How-
ever, tubulin binding within the series (Table 4) was
essentially invariant, while potency of induction of
p21ꢀ/ꢀ cell apoptosis varied by orders of magnitude,
indicating that there is no correlation between tubulin
binding and induction of cell death in this series.
15. Martin, E. J.; Blaney, J. M.; Siani, M. A.; Spellmeyer, D.
C.; Wong, A. K.; Moos, W. H. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38,
1431.
16. (a) Eriksson, L.; Johanasson, E.; Kettaneh-Wold, N.;
Wold, S. Introduction to Multi- and Megavariate Data
Analysis Using Projection Methods (PCA
% PLS);
Umetrics AB: Umea, Sweden, 1999; (b) Calculations
performed using software product SIMPCA-P (Umetrics
AB, Umea, Sweden).
17. The most significant property contributors to the principal
components were as follows: [t]1, correlation to clogP and
reciprocal correlation to #HBD, #HBA, PSA, and
MWortho substituent; [t]2, correlation to MW; [t]3, correla-
tion to MWpara
MWmeta substituent
and reciprocal correlation to
substituent
.
18. 2-Amino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-benzo[b]thiophene-3-carbox-
amide (3a) (29 mg, 0.15 mmol) was suspended in 1 ml n-
butanol. 1,4-Benzodioxane-6-carboxaldehyde (24.6 mg, 1
equiv) and 10 lL conc. HCl were added and the reaction
mixture was heated to 80 ꢁC for 10 h. The reaction
product was collected by filtration, washed with water,
and dried to give 30 mg 4 [LC/MS (Hewlett Packard
1100 MSD with ChemStation Software, Keystone Aqua-
sil C18 50 mm · 2 mm column, 5 lm particle size, at
40 ꢁC, 10 mM NH4OAc–acetonitrile solvent system at
0.8 mL/min flow rate, 254 nm DAD detection, API-ES
scanning mode, fragmentor 70 mV): m/z 341 (M+H);
retention time 2.59 min]. Compounds that were not
judged to be sufficiently pure (>90%) by LC were
purified by RP-HPLC with automatic fraction collection
(Gilson Semi-Preparative HPLC system with Unipoint
Software v. 1.71, Phenomenex C18 Luna column, 21.2
mm · 100 mm, 5 lm particle size, water–acetonitrile sol-
vent system with added 0.05% NH4OH buffer, at
22.5 mL/min).
In summary, we have successfully used a parallel synthe-
sis to rapidly improve the potency of an initial lead. A
physical property-based approach was used to select
the building blocks for synthesis. Although the preferred
2-(1,4-dibenzodioxane) substituent was selected on ac-
count of its similarity to the reference, 4-methoxybenzal-
dehyde, it was not clear from this study if a selection
based on diversity or one based on similarity to a refer-
ence point was preferred. Probably, a combination
approach, as practiced here, is the best. This effort has
demonstrated the value of a parallel synthesis strategy
for the optimization of leads which led to the identifica-
tion of several analogs with submicromolar activity in a
panel of colon cell lines.
References and notes
19. Compounds not shown in the table had IC50 > 20 lM on
80S14, as well as HCT116 cell lines.
1. Paulovich, A. G.; Toczyski, D. P.; Hartwell, L. H. Cell
1997, 88, 315.
20. Compounds not shown on the table had IC50 > 10 lM on
80S14 as well as HCT116 cell lines.