where T is the temperature of the solution in Kelvin, M is the
molecular weight of the solvent, w is the association parameter
equal to 2.6 in this case, n is the viscosity: 0.89 cP in the case of
water at 25 ꢁC and V is the molar volume of the solute at the
normal boiling point estimated for complex molecules from
atomic contributions as defined by La Bas.25 This produced
diffusion coefficient value of 9.3 ꢀ 0.9 ꢂ 10ꢃ6 cm2 sꢃ1 for
cysteine. Modelling of the reaction process with DIGISIM2
for a planar electrode suggested that a forward rate constant
of 9.0 ꢀ 1.0 ꢂ 104 molꢃ1 cm3 sꢃ1 for the catalytic reduction
of octacyanomolybdate(V) with cysteine produced an excellent
fit between the experimentally determined and modelled data.
The corresponding plots of oxidation peak current against
scan rate comparing the theoretically (ꢂ) predicted and experi-
mentally obtained (L) data for a solution containing 250 mM
cysteine and 500 mM Mo(IV) in pH 10 (0.1 M borax, 0.5 M
KCl) and shown in Fig. 7a. Fig. 7b compares the theoretically
modelled (ꢂ) and experimentally obtained (L) plots of peak
current against concentration of cysteine. These plots reveal
that excellent and consistent agreement was observed over a
wide range of scan rates (25 to 400 mV sꢃ1) and concentrations
of thiol added (0–500 mM).
4. Conclusions
We have examined the electrochemical oxidation of octacy-
anomolybdate at solid carbon electrodes (GC and BDD).
The response was found to produce a one electron electroche-
mically reversible signal. Under alkaline conditions the oxi-
dised octacyanomolybdate species was found to react with
the solvent in an EC reaction process. This mechanism has
been successfully modelled using DIGISIM2 modelling with
rate constants deduced for both the heterogeneous and homo-
geneous processes.
Furthermore, the electrochemical oxidation of octacyano-
molybdate has been studied in solutions containing thiols
(cysteine, homocysteine and glutathione). It was shown that
in the presence of thiols a second electrocatalytic reaction
occurred involving the oxidation of the thiol species to the cor-
responding disulfide product and the concomitant reduction of
Mo(V) to Mo(IV). The response was found to be independent of
pH (9–11) suggesting that the octacyanomolybdate(V) species
could oxidise both protonated and de-protonated thiol species.
This overall E(C)C’ reaction mechanism was subsequently
modelled with a suitable rate constant deduced for the homo-
geneous oxidation of cysteine.
3.5. Analytical performance
Acknowledgements
In order to prove that the reaction mechanism of the octacy-
anomolybdate with thiols is generic in nature, analogous experi-
ments were conducted using other thiols: homocysteine and
glutathione. It was found that upon addition of homocysteine
or glutathione to the solution of octacyanomolybdate(IV) an
increase in the oxidation peak current was observed with a cor-
responding decrease in the reduction peak current analogous to
that shown for cysteine.
ON expresses her gratitude to the Analytical Division of
the RSC for the award of a studentship. NSL thanks Schlum-
berger Cambridge Research for financial support.
References
The analytical performance of the above reaction mecha-
nism of cysteine oxidation with the electrochemically generated
octacyanomolybdate(V) was examined through the use of cyc-
lic voltammetry. In order to study the effect of the concentra-
tion of octacyanomolybdate(IV) on both sensitivity and limit of
detection, increasing additions of cysteine were made to solu-
tions with different concentrations of octacyanomolybdate(IV)
(50, 100, 250 and 500 mM). It was found that the sensitivity
was independent of the concentration of the octacyanomolyb-
date; however the limit of detection decreased with lower con-
centrations of octacyanomolybdate. Thus the response of the
electrode in a solution containing 50 mM octacyanomolyb-
date(IV) to increasing additions of cysteine produced the lowest
limit of detection—0.3 mM. This confirms that the reaction
might be utilised for post-column electrochemical detection
of thiols.
1
P. C. White, N. S. Lawrence, J. Davis and R. G. Compton,
Electroanalysis, 2002, 14, 89.
2
3
4
R. Cordova-Orellana and F. Lucena-Conde, Talanta, 1977, 24, 124.
J. G. Leipoldt, L. D. C. Bok, S. S. Bosson, A. J. Van Wyk, C. R.
Dennis and P. J. Cilliers, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1978, 8, 93.
G. J. Lamprecht, J. G. Leipoldt, C. R. Dennis and S. S. Basson,
React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1980, 13, 269.
M. A. Olatunji and R. C. Okechukwu, Transition Met. Chem.,
1987, 12, 205.
M. A. Olatunji and R. O. Okechukwu, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1987,
131, 89.
5
6
7
8
9
H. A. Hodali and R. A. El-Zaru, Polyhedron, 1990, 9, 113.
H. A. Hodali and R. A. El-Zaru, Polyhedron, 1990, 9, 2299.
10 B. Saha, M. Hung and D. M. Stanbury, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41,
5538.
11 H. G. Waddill and G. Gorin, Anal. Chem., 1958, 30, 1069.
12 G. Gorin and W. E. Godwin, J. Catal., 1966, 5, 279.
13 J. M. Leal, B. Garcia and P. L. Domingo, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
1998, 173, 79.
14 J. Svitel, M. Stredansky, A. Pizzariello and S. Miertus, Electro-
analysis, 1998, 10, 581.
15 M. R. Milani, N. R. Stradiotto and A. A. Cardoso, Electro-
analysis, 2003, 15, 827.
16 O. Nekrassova, G. A. Allen, N. S. Lawrence, L. Jiang, T. G. J.
Jones and R. G. Compton, Electroanalysis, 2002, 14, 1464.
17 U. Scho¨der and F. Scholz, Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 1006.
18 A. R. Howells, P. J. Zambrano and M. M. Collinson, Anal.
Chem., 2000, 72, 5265.
19 N. Oyama, T. Ohsaka, N. Yamamoto, J. Matsui and O.
Hatozaki, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1989, 265, 297.
20 A. Marchaj, A. Plesinski and Z. Stasicka, Z. Roczniki Chem.,
1976, 50, 1239.
21 M. Bogdanov, R. Grybos, A. Samotus and K. Bogolitsyn, Transi-
tion Met. Chem., 1993, 18, 599.
22 M. Rudolph, D. P. Reddy and S. W. Feldberg, Anal. Chem., 1994,
66, 589A.
23 G. J. Bridgart, M. W. Fuller and I. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1973, 12, 1274.
24 C. R. Wilke and P. Chang, AIChE J., 1955, 1, 264.
25 Chemical Engineers Handbook, ed. J. H. Perry, McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1950.
Fig. 7 (A) Comparison of the corresponding plots of oxidation peak
current against the square root of the scan rate based on experimen-
tally obtained (L) and modelled (ꢂ) data for solution containing 500
mM octacyanomolybdate and 250 mM cysteine (pH 10). (B) Compari-
son of the corresponding plots of oxidation peak current against con-
centration of cysteine added based on experimentally obtained (L) and
modelled (ꢂ) data for solution containing 500 mM octacyanomolyb-
date (pH 10).
T h i s j o u r n a l i s Q T h e O w n e r S o c i e t i e s 2 0 0 4
1320
P h y s . C h e m . C h e m . P h y s . , 2 0 0 4 , 6 , 1 3 1 6 – 1 3 2 0