J. Janczak
Polyhedron 197 (2021) 115024
2.4. Synthesis of the zinc phthalocyanine complexes 4–7
2.6. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)
A mixture of 4,5-dimethylphthalonitrile 3 (0.2 g, 1.282 mmol)
The purity of the obtained peripherally octamethyl zinc(II)
phthalocyanines with various axial substituents (4–7) were
checked by powder X-ray diffraction on a PANanalytical X’Pert
and zinc acetate (0.08 g, 0.372 mmol) in a glass ampoule was cov-
ered with 10 mL pyridine (3-mepy, 3,4-lutidine or 3,5-lutidine) and
a few drops of DBU as a catalyst. Next the ampoule was degassed
and sealed under reduced pressure. The ampoule was heated at a
temperature of about 10 °C below the boiling point of pyridine
or its corresponding derivative for about 20 h. After such processes,
well-developed single crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray
analysis were obtained. The crystals were separated by filtration,
washed with acetone and diethyl ether, and dried in air.
diffractometer equipped with
a
Cu-K
a
radiation source
(k = 1.54182 Å). The diffraction data were recorded in the range
5–50 ° at room temperature. The powder diffraction patterns of
4–7, together with the simulated ones, are included in the support-
ing information (Fig. S3).
2.7. Hirshfeld surface analysis
Zinc(II)(pyridine)-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-octamethylphthalocya-
nine (4). Yield: 40.5% (0.100 g, 0.130 mmol). Analysis found: Zn,
Hirshfeld surface analysis and 2D fingerprint plots, as well as
8
(
3
1
1
.42; C, 70.55; N, 16.44; H, 4.59%; calculated for C40
C H N): Zn, 8.50; C, 70.26; N, 16.39; H, 4.85%. IR/KBr (cm ):
5 5
32 8
H N Zn
percentage contributions for various intermolecular contacts in
the investigated crystals, were calculated using the Crystal
Explorer Ver. 3.1 program package [20].
À1
400w, 3287w, 2915w, 2216w, 1615 m, 1564w, 1517 s, 1498 s,
446 m, 1394 m, 1372 m, 1330w, 1303 s, 1181w, 1134w,
101vs, 1024 s, 1010vs, 878 m, 838 m, 781w, 775 s, 730w, 689 s.
Zinc(II)(3-methylpyridine)-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24- octamethylph-
2.8. Theoretical calculations
thalocyanine (5). Yield: 37.7% (0.095 g, 0.121 mmol). Analysis
found: Zn, 8.30; C, 70.78; N, 16.00; H, 4.92%; calculated for C40
Molecular orbital calculations with full geometry optimization
H
32
À1
-
of the zinc phthalocyanine complexes 4–7 were performed with
the Gaussian16 program package [21]. All calculations were car-
ried out using the DFT method (Becke3-Lee-Yang-Parr exchange
correlation functional B3LYP) [22] with the 6-31G basis set [23],
assuming the geometry resulting from the X-ray diffraction study
as the starting structures. As convergence criterions, the threshold
limits of 0.00025 and 0.0012 a.u. were applied for the maximum
force and the displacement, respectively. The three-dimensional
molecular electrostatic potential (3D MESP) maps were obtained
on the basis of the DFT (B3LYP/6-31G) optimization. The calculated
N
8 6
Zn(C H
7
N): Zn, 8.35; C, 70.54; N, 16.09; H, 5.02%. IR/KBr (cm ):
3
1
1
6
394w, 3344w, 2360w, 2336w, 1617w, 1562w, 1486 m; 1450,
399 m, 1378 m, 1308 s, 1239 m 1202w, 1178 m, 1132w,
099vs, 1020 s, 988 m, 877 m, 855 m, 804w, 790w, 749 s, 711 s,
68 m, 646 m, 572w, 502w.
Zinc(II)(3,4-dimethylpyridine)-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-
octamethylphthalocyanine (6). Yield: 38.3% (0.098 g, 0.123 mmol).
Analysis found: Zn, 8.10; C, 71.08; N, 15.68; H, 5.14%; calculated for
C
40
H
32
À1
N
8
Zn(C
7 9
H N): Zn, 8.20; C, 70.81; N, 15.81; H, 5.18%. IR/KBr
(
cm ): 3382w, 3338w, 1614 m, 1485 s, 1458 m, 1398 m,
3
(
D MESP was mapped onto the total electron density isosurface
1
1
6
374w, 1332 m, 1308 s, 1240 m, 1203 m, 1174w, 1133w,
098vs, 1018 s, 988 m, 874 m, 857 m, 824w, 805w, 748 s, 714 s,
10w, 572w, 523w, 502w.
À3
0.008 e Å ) for each molecule. The colour code of the MESP maps
À1
is in the range À0.05 (red) to 0.05 e Å (blue). After the geometry
optimization, time-dependent (TD) DFT calculations [24] were per-
formed to evaluate the absorption spectrum employing the same
level and basis sets. All stationary points were optimized without
any symmetry assumptions and characterized by normal coordi-
nate analysis at the same level of theory.
Zinc(II)(3,5-dimethylpyridine)-2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24-
octamethylphthalocyanine (7). Yield: 38.6% (0.099 g, 0.124 mmol).
Analysis found: Zn, 8.08; C, 61.12; N, 15.66; H, 5.145%; calculated
for C40
H
32
À1
N
8
Zn(C
7 9
H N): Zn, 8.20; C, 70.81; N, 15.81; H, 5.18%. IR/
KBr (cm ): 3380w, 3336w, 1615 m, 1487 s, 1458 m, 1399 m,
1
9
5
376w, 1334 m, 1304 s, 1240w, 1173w, 1134w, 1098vs, 1019 s,
87 m, 878 m, 858 m, 804 m, 748 s, 714 s, 667w, 574w, 548w,
02 m.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis
4
,5-Dimethylphthalonitrile was obtained from o-xylene in a
2
.5. X-ray single crystal measurement
two-step reaction using standard procedures [25], as shown in
Scheme 2. The octa-substituted zinc phthalocyanine complexes
4–7 were prepared starting from 4,5-dimethylphthalonitrile 3
and zinc acetate, as shown in Scheme 3. The reaction was carried
out by the solvothermal method using a suitable solvent that also
played the role of an axial ligand as well as the role of the crystal-
lization medium. In addition, a few drops of 1,8-diaza[5.4.0]bicy-
cloundec-7-ene (DBU) were added to the reaction mixture as a
catalyst. The solvothermal reactions were carried out in glass
ampoules under reduced pressure at about 10 °C below the boiling
point of respective solvents (pyridine or its corresponding deriva-
tive) for about 20 h and then they were cooled to room tempera-
ture. Under the solvothermal conditions, the tetramerization of
nitrile 3 with the simultaneous incorporation of the Zn2+ ion into
the central hole of the formed octamethyl-substituted phthalo-
cyaninate(2-) macrocycle takes place. The formed octamethyl sub-
stituted zinc phthalocyanine then interacts with pyridine or its
respective derivative yielding the axially ligated complexes 4–7.
The direct thermal reaction of 4,5-dimethylphthalonitrile with zinc
in the powdered form without pyridine or other solvents was also
The obtained single crystals of 4–7 were used for data collection
on a four-circle KUMA KM4 diffractometer equipped with a two-
dimensional CCD area detector. Graphite monochromatized Mo-
Ka radiation (k = 0.71073 Å) and the x-scan technique (Dx = 1°)
were used for data collection. Lattice parameters were refined by
least-squares methods on all reflection positions. One image was
monitored as a standard after every 40 images for a control of
the stability of the crystal. Data collection and reduction along with
absorption correction were performed using the CrysAlis software
package [16]. The structures were solved by direct methods using
SHELXT [17], giving positions of almost all non-hydrogen atoms.
Initially, the structures were refined using SHELXL-2018 [18] with
anisotropic thermal displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms of
the phthalocyanine moiety as well as of the axial ligands were
refined as rigid. Visualizations of the structures were made with
the Diamond 3.0 program [19]. Details of the data collection
parameters, crystallographic data and final agreement parameters
are collected in Table 1.
3