In light of this, it is not surprising that the values for n , n
intermediate carbanionic species (E1cB).
A
B
and n
: n appear so relevant to the initial 1-alkene selec-
Bw80
B
tivity in the present case, as indicated by a comparison of
Figs. 3 and 6 with 9b. To check in detail how the above
picture Ðts the present results, the initial selectivity to 4-
methylpent-1-ene has been plotted vs. n : n in Fig. 10, where
It has already been noted that Ce Zr O does not lie on
the curve, its selectivity to 4-methylpent-1-ene being rather
low in comparison with that for the other samples of similar
0.2 0.8
2
n : n . For Ce Zr
0.2 0.8
sites is quite similar (n
Bw80
O the strength of the acid and base
B
A
B
A
2
previous data for ceria, lanthania and zirconia-based
catalysts9,11 have also been reported. (Both the present and
former data refer to 50% conversion). With the exception of
Ce Zr O , the two sets of data are Ðtted by the same
: n \ 55%; n
: n \ 61%,
B
Aw80
A
from Figs. 6 and 3). The fraction of alcohol that adsorbs on
these sites by a two-point mechanism does not undergo car-
banion formation, but rather one-step alkene formation
through a concerted E2 pathway. Both the latter and the
simultaneously present E1 mechanism lead to 2-alkene, which
explains the observed low selectivity to 4-methylpent-1-ene.
The conversion of the reactant alcohol, as well as the selec-
tivities to the various products, were not a†ected in the same
way for all the catalysts by time-on-stream. Some loss of the
0.2 0.8
2
volcano-shaped curve. In agreement with the picture outlined,
the maximum in 1-alkene selectivity corresponds to those
catalysts (Na-doped zirconia, ZrO /27;11 ceria prepared from
2
CeIII hydroxide by calcination in air, CeO /49 9 and
2
Ce Zr O ) where the acid and base functions are well-
balanced as to the number of sites (n : n is close to 1), but
unbalanced as to the strength (n
: n \ 0% for ZrO /27 from data in ref. 11; 70 and 31%
for CeO /49 from data in ref. 9, and 86 and 31% for
0.8 0.2
2
B
A
Bw80
: n \ 80% and
overall activity occurred over CeO , where conversion
decreased from 50 to 35% after 24 h on-stream and then did
not change further; the selectivities to 4-methylpent-1-ene,
B
2
n
Aw80
A
2
2
Ce Zr
O
from Figs. 6 and 3). These catalysts represent
S
, 4-methylpent-2-ene, S , C -alkene isomers, S , 4-
0.8 0.2
2
1A
2A
6
C6
somewhat of a limiting case in which dehydration through the
E1cB mechanism predominates. Other limiting cases are rep-
resented by the two zirconia samples ZrO /98 and ZrO /46,
prepared from di†erent precursors:11 on the latter, n : n is
so high that dehydrogenation is strongly favoured over dehy-
dration, on the former, n : n is so low that only dehydration
methylpentan-2-one, S , were nearly constant over the entire
K
run (54, 35, 3 and 1%, respectively). The catalyst appeared
grey-coloured after reaction; after treating at 773 K for 6 h
under air Ñow, the initial activity was restored. Probably,
small amounts of alkene oligomers that accumulated on the
surface during the early hours on-stream are responsible for
the observed activity loss (such an e†ect would be ampliÐed
by the low surface area of the catalyst). This is also suggested
by the presence in the reactor effluent of unusual amounts of
light alkenes (selectivity, S \ 5%), which were detected only
in traces for the other samples; these light alkenes are likely
originated by fragmentation (favoured by the high reaction
temperature) of the oligomers, whose presence was also
2
2
A
B
B
A
practically occurs, almost exclusively by the E1 mechanism.
ZrO , CeO and Ce Zr
O
as well as CeO /48 (a pure
2
2
0.5 0.5
2
2
ceria sample prepared from CeIII nitrate by calcination in air9)
lie on the left-hand branch of the curve in Fig. 10, showing a
tendency of the selectivity to 4-methylpent-1-ene to increase
with n : n . Both Saytze†- and Hofmann-oriented pathways
LA
B
A
are simultaneously present, as indicated by the values of 1-
alkene selectivity (47È60%). As n : n increases, the two-point
adsorption of the reactant alcohol is enhanced, which favours
E2 and E1cB over E1. However, the strength of the acid and
detected in the reactor effluent (selectivity, S \ 2%).
B
A
HA
Inclusion of zirconia in the ceria lattice originates a stable
catalyst for zirconia contents up to 50 mol%; the case of
base sites is not balanced over these catalysts (n
: n \
Ce Zr O , i.e. the more selective catalyst for the desired
Bw80
B
0.8 0.2 2
85% and n
: n \ 55% for CeO /48, from data in ref. 9;
1-alkene, is shown in Fig. 11 as an example. For Ce Zr
O
Aw80
A
2
0.2 0.8 2
n
: n \ 54% and n
: n \ 0% for CeO , 100 and
a continuous increase of conversion with time-on-stream from
ca. 15% up to more than 60% was observed (Fig. 12a), associ-
ated with a remarkable variation of the selectivities (Fig. 12b):
Bw80
B
Aw80
A
2
60% for ZrO , and 81 and 39% for Ce Zr O , from Figs.
2
0.5 0.5 2
6 and 3), which makes 2-alkene formation through the E2
mechanism unlikely. Hofmann orientation could result either
from a concerted pathway (E2 with a transition state having a
growth of 4-methylpent-2-ene, drop of C -alkene isomers,
6
decrease of the desired 1-alkene; only trace amounts of ketone
were formed at any time-on-stream. As already observed for
the acidÈbase properties and the initial selectivity to 1-alkene,
the on-stream features of Ce Zr
O also seem unique in
0.2 0.8
2
comparison with the other CeÈZr samples. It is worthy of note
that this behaviour is also completely di†erent from that of
the parent pure zirconia. For the latter, neither the conversion
nor the selectivities signiÐcantly changed with time-on-stream:
4-methylpent-1-ene was always slightly favoured over 4-
methylpent-2-ene (S \ 55%;
S
\ 43%); C -alkene
1A
2A
6
isomers were almost negligible (S \ 2%); only traces of 4-
C6
methylpentan-2-one were detected.
The observed changes in the catalytic behaviour of
Ce Zr
O with time-on-stream indicate that some kind of
0.2 0.8
2
surface conditioning occurs during reaction. The possibility
should be considered that this stems from a modiÐcation of
the acidÈbase parameters relevant to the reaction selectivity,
originated by a Ce4`/Ce3` shift occurring on the surface as a
consequence of the reducing atmosphere experienced by the
catalyst in contact with the reactant alcohol. However, even
assuming that the reaction conditions make the sample
undergo reduction to an extent similar to that occurring after
overnight exposure to hydrogen atmosphere at 673 K, the
Fig. 10 Initial selectivity to 4-methylpent-1-ene, S , vs. n : n for
1A
B
A
various catalysts. Full symbols refer to previously investigated cata-
lysts: two zirconia samples, ZrO /98 and ZrO /46, prepared from dif-
changes in the values of n : n and n
the observed selectivity changes with time-on-stream. For the
: n do not justify
B
A
Bw80
B
2
2
ferent precursors;11 Na-doped zirconia, ZrO /27;11 two ceria
2
H -exposed sample n : n and n
respectively (from data in Fig. 8); accordingly, a progressive
shift towards a more E1cB character should be expected upon
: n are 1.0 and 63%
samples, CeO /49 and CeO /48, prepared from di†erent precursors9
2
B
A
Bw80
B
2
2
and lanthania, La O /50.9 Open symbols represent the samples inves-
2
3
tigated in this work.
3374 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 3369È3375