Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
To selectively tailor surface properties of MgO, one catalyst
(composition according to row 8 in Table 3) was synthesized using
MgO sintered at 900 °C for 12 h in synthetic air in a muffle furnace.
Physicochemical Characterization. BET surface areas and pore
size distributions were determined by N2 adsorption−desorption at 77
K using a PMI Automated BET Sorptomatic 1900 series instrument.
Prior to the adsorption, the samples were evacuated at 250 °C for 2 h.
ICP-OES. ICP-OES was performed with a SpectroFlame Typ
FTMOA81A ICP-OES spectrometer from Spectro Analytical Instru-
ments. Samples were suspended in deionized water under ultrasonic
treatment. All samples were filtered before analysis.
mg of SiC. After preheating in He to 450 °C and a short equilibration
in the O2 isotope mixture, the temperature was increased with 5 °C/
min to 650 °C, feeding a gas stream of 10 mL/min with a composition
of 2.5% 18O2, 2,5% 16O2 and 95% He. The temperature was held at
650 °C for 15 min. 18O2 with 97% isotopic enrichment was used. For
detection of the different oxygen species, the following m/z signals
were used: 32 for 16O2, 34 for 16O18O and 36 for 18O2.
For the case of ethane, a gas flow of 9 mL/min He, 0.5 mL/min
C2H6 and 0.5 mL C2D6 was fed. The experiment was started at 450 °C
with a temperature ramp of 10 K/min up to 650 °C. The signals at m/
z 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36 were recorded.
Reactant Gases. For ODH of ethane, the following gases (all
supplied from Westfalen AG) were used: He 3.5, ethane (99.995%),
and O2 (10.1%, diluted in He 3.5). For calibrations, ethene 3.5 was
used. For the isotopic labeling studies, C2D6 and 18O2 (97% isotope
enrichment) were used.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Several figures describing reaction kinetics and physicochemical
characterization. This material is available free of charge via the
Catalytic Tests. Catalytic tests were carried out in a plug flow
reactor consisting of a catalyst fixed-bed in a quartz tube surrounded
by a heat distributing block and heating coils. Most experiments used
300 mg of the catalysts diluted in 700 mg SiC (450−600 μm) to
improve the heat transfer and ensure homogeneous temperature over
the entire catalyst bed. Layers of SiC and quartz wool encased the
catalyst bed to minimize dead volume. Reactant flow rates were
individually adjusted by mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst). The
effluent stream composition was quantified by a Maxum Edition II
Process gas chromatograph (Siemens) equipped with TCD detectors.
Oxygen, CO, and CH4 were separated on a Molesieve 5A column (2
m, 60/80 mesh), and the hydrocarbons other than CH4 were
separated on a HayeSep Q column (2 m, 80/100 mesh) combined
with a HayeSep T precolumn (0.5 m, 80/100 mesh). The time-
resolved product stream analysis in transient experiments and isotopic
studies was accomplished with a calibrated Pfeiffer Omni StarTM GSD
320 °C mass spectrometer system connected in parallel.
Steady-State Kinetic Measurements. Standard conditions for
steady-state experiments were partial pressures of ethane (99.5%) and
O2 (10.1% in He) of 70 mbar each with balance He (99.99%) to
atmospheric pressure. A temperature range between 450 and 650 °C
was explored at a WHSV of 0.8 h−1.
Sequential Step Transient Experiments. The catalyst was
heated to the reaction temperature in He and then 10% O2 in He was
subsequently supplied for a variable time (45 min to reach equilibrium,
1 min to establish the kinetics of the intermediate formation in a
different experiment). The probe reaction with ethane (10% C2H6 in
He) followed a purge with 40 mL/min He of variable duration
detecting the ethane consumption and ethene formation by MS
analysis.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Funding of this research by SOLVAY as well as fruitful
exchanges with Dr. Michel Strebelle, Dr. Armin Liebens, Dr.
Marco Piccinini, and Paul Degraeve are acknowledged. We
thank Pinghong Xu and Prof. Nigel Browning (UC Davis,
PNNL) for HAADF-TEM measurements. We also thank Prof.
Andreas Jentys and Maximilian W. Hahn, Technische
Universitat Munchen, and Prof. Angeliki Lemonidou, Aristo-
̈
̈
teles University of Thessaloniki, for fruitful discussions.
Christian Gartner thanks the TUM Graduate School and the
̈
Department Graduate Center Chemistry.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Zimmermann, H.; Walzl, R. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, 2000.
(2) Blasco, T.; Galli, A.; Lopez Nieto, J. M.; Trifiro, F. J. Catal. 1997,
169, 203.
(3) Ciambelli, P.; Lisi, L.; Pirone, R.; Ruoppolo, G.; Russo, G. Catal.
Today 2000, 61, 317.
Ethane and ethene were quantified by linear deconvolution of
different MS signals m/z = 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.
Steady State Isotope Transient Kinetic Analysis (SSITKA).
The LiKCl/MgO + Dy2O3 catalyst was used for the SSITKA
experiment. Three hundred mg of catalyst diluted with 700 mg SiC
was used at steady state for 48 h to achieve stable conversion levels.
Experiments were performed at 550, 600, and 625 °C subsequent to a
20 min He purge at each temperature (Figure 5). The reaction was
run at a WHSV of 0.8 h−1 using partial pressures 70 mbar of ethane
and O2 with He balance to atmospheric pressure. Steady state
operation was established using a feed containing 16O2 for 30 min. The
influent was switched in a step function to a feed containing an
identical concentration of 18O2 instead of 16O2, replacing additionally a
small fraction of He by the inert tracer Kr. The isotope transient at
steady-state was monitored for 40 min. A blank experiment at 625 °C
with SiC was used to exclude contributions of gas-phase reactions. The
effluent composition was quantified by MS analysis assigning the
following components to the respective mass to charge ratios: 16O2
(m/z: 32), 16O18O (m/z: 34), 18O2 (m/z: 36), H216O (m/z: 18),
H218O (m/z: 20), C16O2 (m/z: 44), C16O18O (m/z: 46), C18O2 (m/z:
48), Kr (m/z: 84).
(4) Gartner, C. A.; van Veen, A. C.; Lercher, J. A. ChemCatChem
2013, 5, 3196.
̈
(5) Kumar, C.; Gaab, S.; Muller, T.; Lercher, J. Top. Catal. 2008, 50,
̈
156.
(6) Tope, B.; Zhu, Y.; Lercher, J. A. Catal. Today 2007, 123, 113.
(7) Landau, M. V.; Gutman, A.; Herskowitz, M.; Shuker, R.; Bitton,
Y.; Mogilyansky, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 176, 127.
(8) Chin, Y.-H.; Buda, C.; Neurock, M.; Iglesia, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 15958.
(9) Cherginets, V. L.; Demirskaya, O. V.; Rebrova, T. P. J. Chem.
Thermodyn. 2004, 36, 115.
(10) Campbell, S.; Hollins, P.; McCash, E.; Roberts, M. W. J. Electron
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1986, 39, 145.
(11) Grzybowska-Swierkosz, B. Top. Catal. 2000, 11−12, 23.
(12) Argyle, M. D.; Chen, K.; Bell, A. T.; Iglesia, E. J. Phys. Chem. B
2002, 106, 5421.
(13) Chen, K.; Iglesia, E.; Bell, A. T. J. Catal. 2000, 192, 197.
(14) Sterrer, M.; Fischbach, E.; Risse, T.; Freund, H.-J. Phys. Rev. Lett.
2005, 94, 186101.
Isotope Scrambling Experiments. Temperature programmed
isotopic exchange experiments with oxygen isotopes were performed
with several catalysts. Three hundred mg catalyst was diluted with 700
(15) Carrasco, J.; Lopez, N.; Illas, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 225502.
(16) Chen, K.; Iglesia, E.; Bell, A. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 105, 646.
J
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja505411s | J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX