A R T I C L E S
Tobisu et al.
directed toward developing new Lewis acid catalyzed reactions
using isocyanides as a C1 component, we found that isocyanides
can indeed be inserted into a C-O bond of cyclic acetals in
the presence of a catalytic amount of GaCl3 (eq 4).18
(3,3-dimethyl-1,4-dioxan-2-ylidene)-2,6-dimethylphenylamine
(3a) in 47% yield, along with the double insertion pro-
duct 4a in 5% yield (eq 5, Ar ) 2,6-Me2C6H3). We next
examined the importance of the structure of the isocyanide on
this reaction. Increasing the steric demand of the isocyanide
had little effect on the efficiency of the reaction (eq 5, Ar )
2,6-i-Pr2C6H3). On the other hand, the introduction of electron-
withdrawing atoms, such as chlorine and bromine, on the
benzene ring of the aryl isocyanide led to a marked improve-
ment in both yield and selectivity for the monoinsertion prod-
uct 3c and 3d (eq 5, Ar ) 2,6-Cl2C6H3 and 2,6-Br2C6H3).
The use of tert-butyl isocyanide did not afford the insertion
product.
Although such an insertion reaction has been reported by Ito
and Saegusa prior to our work, the reaction, as described in
their work, requires the use of a stoichiometric amount of TiCl4,
and the scope has not been investigated extensively (two
examples).19 In this paper, we disclose the full details of our
work, including the discovery of a new Brønsted acid catalyst,
the extension to an unprecedented insertion into acyclic acetals,
and the control over the three different reaction pathways by
the nature of N-substituents of isocyanides.
By employing isocyanide 2d, we next explored the scope of
the catalytic insertion reaction (Table 1). The reaction proceeded
effectively with 1,3-dioxolanes derived from a range of aliphatic
ketones (entries 2-4). The yields were lowered, when acetals
derived from aromatic (entry 5) and R,â-unsaturated (entry 6)
ketones were employed; however, in the latter case, the use of
2 equiv of isocyanide increased the yield. 1,3-Dioxolanes
derived from aldehydes are significantly less reactive compared
to those derived from ketones (entries 7-9). 1,3-Dioxane
furnished diminished yields of the insertion product, presumably
due to the requirement of the demanding seven-membered ring
formation (entry 10).
Results and Discussion
Insertion into Cyclic Acetals. Our continuing interests in
the unique catalytic behavior of GaCl318,20-26 led us to discover
that a combination of GaCl3 and an isocyanide is a useful system
for cycloaddition reactions with R,â-unsaturated carbonyl
compounds.26 In the course of further examination of the GaCl3/
isocyanide system with other oxygenated compounds, we found
that isocyanides can be inserted into the C-O bond in cyclic
acetals (eq 5).
Catalyst Screening for the Insertion into Acyclic Acetals.
Although we established the first catalytic protocol for
the insertion of an isocyanide into a C-O bond of an acetal, as
mentioned above, several limitations associated with the
GaCl3-catalyzed reaction restricted the potential utility of the
reaction. First, the applicable substrates are strictly limited
to cyclic acetals. Moreover, within the cyclic acetals, only
those derived from aliphatic ketones afforded the insertion
product in good yields. Second, polar functional groups, such
as nitro and cyano groups, are not compatible due to catalyst
deactivation by complex formation. To overcome these draw-
backs, we decided to reexamine the reaction conditions for the
insertion of an isocyanide into an acyclic acetal. Despite the
apparent similarity, cyclic and acyclic acetals pose very different
synthetic challenges when applied to such reactions. The
difficulty associated with acyclic acetals is not surprising
considering the proposed stepwise insertion mechanism il-
lustrated in Scheme 1. For cyclic acetals, the once cleaved
alkoxy group (ROM) remains in the substrate. As a result, the
recombination (B f C) proceeds via a facile intramolecular
process.18 In contrast, in the case of acyclic acetals, the
recombination of the ROM competes with other undesired
intermolecular processes, such as the nucleophilic attack of
the second molecule of an isocyanide or contaminated water.
Indeed, acyclic acetals are not applicable to insertion reactions
of isocyanides reported for cyclic acetals, resulting in the
formation of a substitution product rather than an insertion
product.18,27 Thus, insertion into acyclic acetals represents a
formidable challenge in view of the lack of precedent for such
a process.
Thus, the reaction of 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane (0.4 mmol, 1)
with 2,6-xylylisocyanide (0.44 mmol, 2a) in the presence of
GaCl3 (0.04 mmol) in toluene (1.5 mL) at 80 °C for 12 h gave
(14) Nguyen, P. T.; Palmer, W. S.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64,
1843.
(15) Murakami, M.; Suginome, M.; Matsuura, T.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 8899.
(16) Kuniyasu, H.; Sugoh, K.; Su, M. S.; Kurosawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 4669.
(17) Suginome, M.; Fukuda, T.; Nakamura, H.; Ito, Y. Organometallics 2000,
19, 719.
(18) Yoshioka, S.; Oshita, M.; Tobisu, M.; Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3697.
(19) Ito, Y.; Imai, H.; Segoe, K.; Saegusa, T. Chem. Lett. 1984, 937.
(20) Reviews on the use of gallium salts in organic synthesis: (a) Yamaguchi,
M.; Tsukagoshi, T.; Arisawa, M. Chemtracts 2000, 13, 431. (b) Kellog, R.
M. Chemtracts 2003, 16, 79.
(21) For recent examples of gallium(III)-catalyzed reactions by other groups,
see: (a) Surya, P. G. K.; Yan, P.; To¨ro¨k, B.; Bucsi, I.; Tanaka, M.; Olah,
G. A. Catal. Lett. 2003, 85, 1. (b) Yuan, F.; Zhu, C.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Pan,
Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 682, 102. (c) Bez, G.; Zhao, C.-G. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 4991. (d) Usugi, S.; Yorimitsu, H.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima,
K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 601. (e) Amemiya, R.; Fujii, A.; Yamaguchi, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4333. (f) Amemiya, R.; Nishimura, Y.;
Yamaguchi, M. Synthesis 2004, 1307. (g) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.;
Padmavani, B.; Gupta, M. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7577. (h) Sun,
P.; Hu, Z.; Huang, Z. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 4293. (i) Winkler, J. D.;
Asselin, S. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3975.
(22) Chatani, N.; Inoue, H.; Kotsuma, T.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 10294.
(23) Inoue, H.; Chatani, N.; Murai, S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1414.
(24) Oshita, M.; Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4323.
(25) Oshita, M.; Okazaki, T.; Ohe, K.; Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 331.
(26) Chatani, N.; Oshita, M.; Tobisu, M.; Ishii, Y.; Murai, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 7812. Oshita, M.; Tobisu, M.; Yamashita, K.; Chatani, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 761.
(27) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Watanabe, K.; Shiono, M. Chem. Lett. 1974, 1457. (b)
Pellissier, H.; Meou, A.; Gil, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2979. (c)
Pellissier, H.; Gil, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6773.
9
11432 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 37, 2007