ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Letter
PBS at pH 7.2, solutions of 23 and 25 remained at >98% purity
for 1 month at 23 °C and 48 h (limit of testing) at 37 °C in cell
culture media as determined by monitoring by NMR. On the
other hand, carbamate 24 underwent hydrolysis in aqueous
media, converting to a purple phenolate of 23, suggesting its
potential to provide a means to improve the pharmacological
properties of 24 through pro-drug optimization and activation
strategies.
solubility and comparable activity. Analogues with improved
solubility, while retaining the cytotoxicity and similar biological
profiles, were synthesized. Finally, a new route was presented
that provides a solution to the regioselectivity issue. Overall,
these studies suggest that it is feasible to design melanoma-
specific seriniquinone derivatives with druglike properties.
While carbamate 24 suggests the possibility of pro-drug design,
referring to it as a pro-drug would be premature without in
depth in vivo studies. Efforts are now underway to complete
pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization and translate
a lead molecule with viable in vivo activity against melanoma.
Next, we explored the effects of 1, 23, and 24 on DCD
expression to validate that 23 and 24 target the same pathway
as 1.11 As shown in Figure 6, we observed a comparable
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental methods, spectroscopic data, and copies of
1
select H and 13C NMR spectra (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
Figure 6. Relative DCD mRNA expression in HCT-116, Malme-3M,
and SK-MEL-28 cells treated with 1, 23, and 24. Concentrations were
given in HCT-116 by 1 μM (+) and 10 μM (++), and in Malme-3M
or SK-MEL-28 by 30 nM (+) and 100 nM (++). Doxorubicin (D; 0.5
μM) and DMSO (0.5%) were used as positive and negative controls,
respectively. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to quantitative
PCR analysis by a one-step RT-PCR system to detect the mRNA
expression of DCD and RPLPO (large ribosomal protein).
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
increase in DCD expression in cells treated with 1 and phenol
23. Across all three cell lines, phenol 23 and carbamate 24
demonstrated comparable or improved induction of DCD
expression when compared to 1. This increase in DCD
expression (Figure 6) combined with activity data (Table 1)
indicates that 23 and 24 share similar modes of action as 1.11
Finally, to evaluate for “off-target” redox activity, we resorted
to the CellROX assay25,26 using HCT-116 cells. We did not
detect oxidative stress elicited by these materials, as indicated
by the lack of green fluorescent mitochondria due to the
generation of reactive oxygen species (Figure 7, Figure S6).
This, along with the lack of DNA binding (Figure 5), confirms
that 9a/9b and 24 do not act like quinones24 but, rather,
represent a unique DCD-targeting pharmacophore.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by the NIH, National Cancer
Institute under Grant CA 044848 to W.F., the Taubman
Foundation to W.F., and FAPESP Grant (processes 2015/
17117-6, 2016/10854-5, and 2018/07661-6) to L.V.C.-L. We
thank Drs. Yongxuan Su (UC San Diego) and Anthony Mrse
(UC San Diego) for assistance with mass spectral analyses and
NMR spectral data, respectively.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Luke, J. J.; Flaherty, K. T.; Ribas, A.; Long, G. V. Targeted agents
and immunotherapies: optimizing outcomes in melanoma. Nat. Rev.
Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 463−482.
In summary, we identified the SAR within the seriniquinone
core and further validated it as a unique pharmacophore. These
studies provided single-isomeric analogues of 1 with improved
(2) Leiter, U.; Eigentler, T.; Garbe, C. Epidemiology of skin cancer.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 810, 120−140.
(3) Lee, J. J.; Murphy, G. F.; Lian, C. G. Melanoma epigenetics:
novel mechanisms, markers, and medicines. Lab. Invest. 2014, 94,
822−838.
(4) Besaratinia, A.; Tommasi, S. Epigenetics of human melanoma:
promises and challenges. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 6, 356−367.
(5) Griffin, M.; Scotto, D.; Josephs, D. H.; Mele, S.; Crescioli, S.;
Bax, H. J.; Pellizzari, G.; Wynne, M. D.; Nakamura, M.; Hoffmann, R.
M.; Ilieva, K. M.; Cheung, A.; Spicer, J. F.; Papa, S.; Lacy, K. E.;
Karagiannis, S. N. BRAF inhibitors: resistance and the promise of
combination treatments for melanoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 78174−
78192.
(6) Arozarena, I.; Wellbrock, C. Overcoming resistance to BRAF
inhibitors. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017, 5, 387.
(7) Karoulia, Z.; Gavathiotis, E.; Poulikakos, P. I. New perspectives
for targeting RAF kinase in human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17,
676−691.
Figure 7. Confocal microscopic images of HCT-116 cells depicting
the effects of 9a/9b and 24 on oxidative stress from CellROX Green
(green) and nuclear counterstaining from NucBlue (blue).
̀
(8) Mattia, G.; Puglisi, R.; Ascione, B.; Malorni, W.; Care, A.;
Matarrese, P. Cell death-based treatments of melanoma:conventional
D
ACS Med. Chem. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX