J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4241-4242
4241
Scheme 1. Retro-synthetic Analysis of the PSGL-1
N-terminal Sulfated Glycopeptide
Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of a PSGL-1 N-Terminal
Glycopeptide Containing Tyrosine Sulfate and
r-O-Linked Sialyl Lewis X
Kathryn M. Koeller, Mark E. B. Smith,
Rong-Fong Huang, and Chi-Huey Wong*
Department of Chemistry
The Scripps Research Institute and
Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology
10550 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, California 92037
ReceiVed February 9, 2000
Tyrosine sulfation and O-linked glycosylation are post-
translational modifications of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1
(PSGL-1) that are required for high-affinity binding interactions
with P-selectin.1 Interestingly, N-terminal fragments of PSGL-1
containing a core 2 O-linked glycan and tyrosine sulfate bind to
P-selectin with affinity similar to that of the full-length homo-
dimeric PSGL-1 protein.2 This suggests that simple sulfated
glycopeptide structures may be suitable for disruption of PSGL-
1/P-selectin binding events during excessive leukocyte infiltration
in the inflammatory response.3 The PSGL-1 core 2 O-glycan
attached to Thr16 displays sialyl Lewis X (sLex), the minimum
selectin binding determinant, on the â-1,6-branch of an R-linked
GalNAc.4 Of greater interest is the role of the tyrosine sulfate.
The isolated sLex tetrasaccharide binds to P-selectin only weakly
(Kd ≈ 3-4 mM), yet the N-terminal fragment of PSGL-1
containing sLex and tyrosine sulfate adheres with nanomolar
affinity.2
The chemoenzymatic synthesis of sulfated glycopeptides has
not been previously reported on a preparative scale. To develop
methodology toward the synthesis of sulfated glycopeptides, as
well as to investigate PSGL-1 biosynthesis and P-selectin interac-
tions, a portion of the PSGL-1 N-terminus was selected as a
synthetic target. Traditional chemical synthesis of sulfated gly-
copeptides has been prohibitive, due to lability of sulfate esters
to the acid catalysts used in chemical glycosylation reactions.
However, the utility of enzymes as catalysts provides another
synthetic avenue. Enzymatic glycosylations with glycosyltrans-
ferases proceed at essentially neutral conditions and are therefore
compatible with the presence of a sulfate ester. By combining
chemical and enzymatic methodology, the synthesis of a PSGL-1
glycopeptide containing tyrosine sulfate and an R-linked sLex
O-glycan was accomplished. The synthetic sequence outlined in
Scheme 1 should be applicable to the chemoenzymatic synthesis
of sulfated glycopeptides in general.
readily available glycosyltransferases â-1,4-galactosyltransferase
(â-1,4-GalT), R-2,3-sialyltransferase (R-2,3-SiaT), and R-1,3-
fucosyltransferase-V (R-1,3-FucT V).
Initially, the chemical portion of the synthesis required a
glycosylated threonine residue for incorporation into solid-phase
peptide synthesis (SPPS). The disaccharide-linked threonine
structure 15 represents the (â-1,6)-branch of the core 2 O-glycan
on which sLex is constructed. Utilizing glycoconjugate 1 in SPPS
allowed the subsequent enzymatic synthesis to proceed with the
Glycosyl-threonine 1 was incorporated into an Fmoc-based
SPPS strategy on Rink amide functionalized resin (Scheme 2).
The iterative synthesis provided glycosylated octapeptide 2
attached to the solid support. Cleavage from the resin was then
performed with TFA/H2O, conditions that also resulted in
deprotection of the t-Bu esters and ether, yielding 3. With
protected glycoconjugate 3 in hand, access to sulfated and
unsulfated versions of the glycopeptide was possible. In the first
case, tyrosine sulfation was achieved through reaction of 3 with
SO3-pyr complex. Subsequently, basic hydrolysis of the acetate
protecting groups gave sulfated 4a. Simple deprotection of 3 under
identical conditions afforded unsulfated 4b.
As previously reported, sulfation on tyrosine affected the ability
of â-1,4-GalT to catalyze the addition of galactose to glycopeptide
4a.5 Under conditions successfully utilized for reaction with
unsulfated 4b (Scheme 3), reaction of â-1,4-GalT with sulfated
4a proceeded slowly. As a further hindrance, proteolytic products
(1) (a) Wilkins, P. P.; Moore, K. L.; McEver, R. P.; Cummings, R. D. J.
Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 22677. (b) DeLuca, M.; Dunlop, L. C.; Andrews, R.
K.; Flannery, J. V., Jr.; Ettling, R.; Cumming, D. A.; Veldman, G. M.; Berndt,
M. C. J. Biol Chem. 1995, 270, 26734. (c) Sako, D.; Comess, K. M.; Barone,
K. M.; Camphausen, R. T.; Cumming, D. A.; Shaw, G. D. Cell 1995, 83,
323. (d) Pouyani, T.; Seed, B. Cell 1995, 83, 333.
(2) Leppanen, A.; Mehta, P.; Ouyang, Y.-B.; Ju, T.; Helin, J.; Moore, K.
L.; van Die, I.; Canfield, W. M.; McEver, R. P.; Cummings, R. D. J. Biol.
Chem. 1999, 274, 24838.
(3) (a) Kansas, G. S. Blood 1996, 88, 3259. (b) Rosen, S. D.; Bertozzi, C.
R. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6, 261.
(4) Wilkins, P. P.; McEver, R. P.; Cummings, R. D. J. Biol. Chem. 1996,
271, 18732.
(5) Koeller, K. M.; Smith, M. E. B.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 742.
10.1021/ja0004938 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/15/2000